It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by camaro68ss
Originally posted by leemachino
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by leemachino
I am ok with paying 2% more in hopes that the benefits I have paid into for the past 20 years might still be around when I may need them.
You really think it will be around for you when you are ready for SS?
That is alot of money to pay for just "hope".
Its not that much money. I do believe it will be around when it comes time for me to collect. Unless the gov gives it to the bankers.
If congress would lift the cap so everyone pays the same % instead of the first 100k+ being taxed there wouldnt even be a need for the tax break to expire.
Dont blame Obama, call your congress man or woman. They let it expire.
Im 26 and been paying into SS for 8 years. I will not see SS check when im 65 years old. Its not going to happen. The people that pay into vs those who collect starts to invert by 2018. So by 2018 there will be more people collecting SS then paying in it. He’s a solution. I opt out, the government can keep the 8 years I’ve paid into it and I wave any future collections when I’m 65.
I feel I can invest my money better than any government agency.
Your problem is your “hoping” the government doesn’t give your money to bankers. I say stop giving the government your retirement money in the first place.
Even worse, and this is from the CBO, Medicares CASH drys up by 2016! thats 3 years from now! Still trust the government with your money? We are all paying into it and wont see a dime. Classic Ponzi scheme and no one is talking about it!edit on 21-2-2013 by camaro68ss because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Crakeur
reply to post by Sparky63
in what capacity? the distributions from pension plans are already taxed and, for those making over $200k, they are also tagging a doubling up of the medicare on that money.
perhaps some links would be of use here.
But many in Washington see our investment accounts not as the expressions of well-planned, disciplined decisions but as untapped reservoirs of wealth they can drain to fix the problems that they caused.....President Obama's National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, for instance, proposed lowering the cap on the amount workers could place in their 401(k)s without incurring taxes.
And nearly three years ago, Newt Gingrich and Peter Ferrara wrote on these pages about the Treasury and Labor departments "asking for public comment on 'the conversion of 401(k) savings and Individual Retirement Accounts into annuities or other steady payment streams.'"
"In plain English," said Gingrich and Ferrara, "the idea is for the government to take your retirement savings in return for a promise to pay you some monthly benefit in your retirement years." ....And when they are served up in front of hungry politicians, they can be quickly devoured. All that will be left for the account holders will be a few crumbs.
Originally posted by tovenar
So, am I the only person on ATS who has a job????
"Get used to it." Everyone who wants to say this in a post to me, needs to send me $30 a week from now on.
Originally posted by Gwampo
Originally posted by tovenar
So, am I the only person on ATS who has a job????
"Get used to it." Everyone who wants to say this in a post to me, needs to send me $30 a week from now on.
amen brother, sometimes it seems that way huh!
I'd be willing to bet that a lot, not all, but a lot of people here are receiving some kind of government aid instead of making an honest, hard-earned living. ( judging by the responses, of course)
Originally posted by leemachino
I am ok with paying 2% more in hopes that the benefits I have paid into for the past 20 years might still be around when I may need them.