It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In a truly free society, and in the America that I am from, there is no "bottom half" of our population. All men are created equal. None are more equal than others. We are all of equal worth, and there is no social class system.
Originally posted by Creep Thumper
Originally posted by onequestion
reply to post by Creep Thumper
There is a clear social divide in this country and if your on the better half of it you can afford a lawyer.
If you behave yourself you don't need a lawyer.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by Creep Thumper
I have as well, and am doing well myself. I am lucky that the things I enjoy doing are not made illegal, I guess. That way my lifestyle hasn't found itself on the wrong side of the law.
But its a damn shame that in a nation that touts itself as the "land of the free", we have to fear acting like free people.
Originally posted by Creep Thumper
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by Creep Thumper
I have as well, and am doing well myself. I am lucky that the things I enjoy doing are not made illegal, I guess. That way my lifestyle hasn't found itself on the wrong side of the law.
But its a damn shame that in a nation that touts itself as the "land of the free", we have to fear acting like free people.
Do you? I don't. What is it that you fear to do?
Originally posted by Hefficide
reply to post by onequestion
I can agree with and empathize with what you are saying, with three caveats:
1) An across the board loss of rights for all felons doesn't make sense to me. Not all felonies are created equal. I once made the decision to have an employee charged for stealing from the job ( a compact disc ) - not knowing ( I'd just moved to Texas ) that the state of Texas considers all workplace theft to be embezzlement, thus a felony. In attempting to make a statement to my staff I, sadly, possibly ruined a young mans life. All over eight ninety-nine.
The loss of rights for any felony should reflect only the rights that the persons felony categorically fell into. IE commit armed robbery? Sorry... no more guns for you. Embezzle? In that case I can see a loss of the right to be taken solely at ones word.
2) For most felonies there should be some sort of time limit ( if there isn't already ) after which a felon could petition for reinstatement of his rights. If someone makes a stupid mistake in their late teens / early twenties? I see no reason why they shouldn't get some review or consideration come their thirties or forties. Assuming, that is, they keep their noses clean in the interim.
3) If there was a gun involved in your felony, sorry to say it, but I feel that you probably should not ever have the right to own a gun afterward. This isn't personal. I just feel that such stern restrictions might help to keep younger folks from repeating the mistakes of prior generations. I grew up with a lot of older role models, many of whom were severe drug addicts. While I did pick up a few of their bad habits, drugs ( in any form ) are not on the list. Just seeing the trouble, sickness, pain, and death in several cases - that drugs caused and that I witnessed? I was put off of the idea of trying them before I ever had the urge. Kids seeing older felons languishing for their rights might well have the same sort of negatively reinforcing effect.
~Heff
Ummmmm..........NO...I can't for the life of me recall...ever...seeing an honest to goodness saint....You know who I mean, the guy that never does anything wrong...ever. Never driven over the speed limit, never rolled through a stop sign, never took a leak outdoors or played the music extra loud in his car................Like I said, they just havn't been caught...But hey...If your THAT GUY then I hear the Vatican is taking applications...
Originally posted by Creep Thumper
Maybe it's just that the other half have behaved themselves.
Originally posted by Creep Thumper
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
Whatever.
Court proceedings are a matter of public record. However, the court has the power to seal court records. Some records are automatically deemed confidential such as doctor and patient correspondence, sessions with a licensed mental health professional, sexual assault victims and juvenile records. If information disclosed during a trial is harmful to the plaintiff or defendant, file a motion to seal the court record.
An individual arrested or convicted of a crime such as petty theft may want a fresh start without the consequences which accompany a criminal record. Instead of lying or not informing employers or landlords about your old criminal record, you can expunge it. Expunging an old criminal record refers to the process of either deleting or sealing an arrest and/ or conviction record. Expunging your criminal record has many advantages. For instance, when a judge or magistrate grants an expungement, you won't need to disclose any information about the arrest or conviction to others such as potential employers, landlords or police officials.