It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
To doubt them all would be stupid as would be to trust them all so we have to use our own choices on this and his was to trust it while you and me would be sceptical based on zero provability but it does not mean its untrue.
Ok, you must be right because you said it. There is no way this could be real because it is a story from a friend of a friend, and not a direct witness testimony because the testimony could be fake.
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by Philippines
Ok, you must be right because you said it. There is no way this could be real because it is a story from a friend of a friend, and not a direct witness testimony because the testimony could be fake.
Right. its called here-say and innuendo. Not acceptable in a court of law, by itself.. Its eyewitness testimony, plus evidence and corroboration combined together that allow a court (or jurors) to make up their mind.
We are the jurors. I respect your opinion too. Just don't ask me to swear by it.
Wow, tough crowd. I think this is the first time I have visited this forum. I didn't realize that if I had a casual UFO-sighting story to share I would have to present it here and defend it like in a court of law.
Originally posted by Druscilla
No matter how impressive someone's impression of an overdone racist stereotype of a buck-tooth'd, bottle thick glasses wearing, slant eyed, bad EngRish "oooo-fo" yelling, over excitable claimed Japanese student, don't make it true.
Further, it's entirely possible to be passively under the "influence" when one is not actively under the influence.
One such example of this is called Flashbacks.
Originally posted by Druscilla
The word "hippy" and UFO together in the title don't give this story much credibility, no matter how fun or entertaining the story might be.
If this had occurred here where I live I might have heard the other observer shouting something sounding like, "¡Obney! ¡Obney!
Originally posted by Druscilla
reply to post by manmental
Please, then, edit your story to drop the whole "Sam does a better impression", as well as dropping the racial-ethno sterotype of yelling "ooo-fo", instead of simply making the statement that another student (nationality and ethnic heritage unspecified), very exited, started jumping up and down yelling and pointing about the "ufo".
When you start talking about doing impressions, and going out of your way to fill in or perpetuate racially/ethic stereotypes, including accents, you're being racially and culturally insensitive regardless of whether you think you are or are not.
If you don't understand this, then, I feel very sad for you.
edit:
... on the ricter scale of cultural sensitivity and manners, doing accents and impressions as you've described on top of going out of one's way to mention the cultural origin of a character, is a few steps above talking loudly and slowly in rudeness and insensitivity to someone not of your own cultural heritage.
I mean, what's next?
Are you going to show us how black people act and sound when they see a UFO?
edit on 16-2-2013 by Druscilla because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by Erongaricuaro
If this had occurred here where I live I might have heard the other observer shouting something sounding like, "¡Obney! ¡Obney!
Thats part of the story I beg to differ with. I have been in a group of people all of us observing something and all I remember hearing is, "What is that?"
That is the expected reply. At the time of observation one is speechless, mesmerized, seemingly fixated and very quiet. At the moment of incredulity, then some speak... not to claim they know, only exclaim there dumbfounded-ment or surprise and wonderment. It is that compelling. Believe me, I know.
Only after the sighting ended did we all look at each other in jaw drop amazement and no one wanted to be the first to claim anything and maybe look the fool. It was more along the lines of explaining what it could have been and only after every avenue was exhausted and some arguing. Then it was, what couldn't it have been?
We want to believe that something out of this world is really our imagination or some misunderstanding. Back and forth. Back and forth. Then the corroborative process begins. What did you see? What do you think it was? And most stay silent or state that they don't know. Not one of us voiced the opinion we all secretly shared, knowing the response would be ridicule... "What, are you crazy?"
Thats real world.
Right and everybody is the exact same.
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by 3n19m470
Right and everybody is the exact same.
No... unlike the OP, I am a first hand witness.
Thats one difference.
And that is why you don't find my experience in a thread. Because even though it really happened, it is still just here-say. Thats another difference. I know that. And don't really care what others think. I balance my debunking with my own viewpoint so people understand where I am coming from.
I compare other experiences to my own because I am still wanting to know what it was I saw too. Thats why I come to ATS. Once you have heard me enough you will know that I don't call fake on everything that I respond too. There are a lot of good cases out there. A lot have been brought to ATS and I am on some of them trying to figure out whats really going on. Are you still there?
Originally posted by Druscilla
No matter how impressive someone's impression of an overdone racist stereotype of a buck-tooth'd, bottle thick glasses wearing, slant eyed, bad EngRish "oooo-fo" yelling, over excitable claimed Japanese student, don't make it true.
Further, it's entirely possible to be passively under the "influence" when one is not actively under the influence.
One such example of this is called Flashbacks.
The word "hippy" and UFO together in the title don't give this story much credibility, no matter how fun or entertaining the story might be.
edit on 16-2-2013 by Druscilla because: (no reason given)