It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zarniwoop
There is not nearly enough context to determine whether the use of force was justified.
1. I'm going to guess the guy wasn't pulled over for a broken turn signal.
2. He should have let the cops cuff him when on the ground, but it does look like he was resisting that. For all they know he is reaching for a weapon.
Originally posted by Carreau
reply to post by cripmeister
Read the police report? written by whom? the police? a report is only as truthful as the person who writes it.
I would rather SEE what happened as opposed to someone writing what happened.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
"Stop resisting!" Police lingo for "Now I can kick the s&%t out of you because there is reason for witnesses believe that you are resisting."
They'll walk away scott free.edit on 14-2-2013 by captaintyinknots because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by guymontag
Originally posted by Zarniwoop
There is not nearly enough context to determine whether the use of force was justified.
1. I'm going to guess the guy wasn't pulled over for a broken turn signal.
2. He should have let the cops cuff him when on the ground, but it does look like he was resisting that. For all they know he is reaching for a weapon.
There is NEVER a time when this is justified. EVER.
Police are not executioners or "punishers".
End of discussion.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by homeslice
Yes, it was a high speed chase...
www.nbc-2.com...
In my opinion it does not justify the beating he took as he clearly surrendered.
ETA:
I edited my OP to acknowledge that there was a high speed chase that lead up to this altercation.edit on 2/14/2013 by Corruption Exposed because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Tancred
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
Your average person will resist being beaten, therefore, resisting arrest will always be on the list of charges. And I think any reasonable person's natural reaction would be to fight off such an attack. Whether it is the Police or otherwise. Common sense people. I hope he sues the # out of those cops and takes their paycheck and their jobs.
Originally posted by guymontag
Originally posted by Zarniwoop
There is not nearly enough context to determine whether the use of force was justified.
1. I'm going to guess the guy wasn't pulled over for a broken turn signal.
2. He should have let the cops cuff him when on the ground, but it does look like he was resisting that. For all they know he is reaching for a weapon.
There is NEVER a time when this is justified. EVER.
Police are not executioners or "punishers".
End of discussion.
Originally posted by rival
I've seen this many times...
Protecting yourself from violent attack becomes "resisting arrest."
If you get punched in the face and stomach your first instinct is NOT to lie still and
place your hands behind your back...in fact that would be nearly impossible.
LEO's wanting to exact some "instant justice" know this.
This tape shows them putting it into action.
When the smoke clears the tape will show the perp resisting....and the police will be exonerated
edit on 14-2-2013 by rival because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by alienjuggalo
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
Absolute bs. Might as well just keep running