It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wandering Scribe
reply to post by dodol
I'm a bit confused by the way you stated your position, but I think I understand enough of it. Let me know if I have this wrong, but, you're suggesting that...
Being conscious, and being aware, are two different things. Consciousness, or existing within a body (what you refer to as an avatar) is a secondary, or tertiary state-of-being. Awareness is our primary state, and if we are/become aware, then we somehow transcend our physical body, detaching from consciousness, which, seemingly, arises from the spectrum of emotions?
You're talking about a type of moksha, satori, or nirvana here, aren't you?
My question then would be: how did you end up within your avatar at all?
If you were, or are, a part of the "aware," how did you even end up muddled into an individualistic body? For a perfected being to even consider a body composed of emotion, desire, or craving, means that such elements are not actually voided by ascending up the ladder of awareness, but that they are just as existent there, as here. Otherwise, the temptation of tangibility would never have arisen.
Originally posted by Angle
I have a question for the participators of this thread.
All is desire. If not, why did you do all you've done and did?, right..
Putting flowers on the table was a desire. To put your socks on has been a desire. ..?
Some desires one shouldn't do.
Good desires, bad desires.. still desires. Right people!!
?
Originally posted by Wandering Scribe
reply to post by dodol
Do you think, then, that were you to achieve nirvana, or some similar state, that all emotion and desire would disappear?
In escaping from the wheel of samsara, do you leave behind all love, compassion, joy, peace, calm, discomfort, sorrow, anger, and hate? Or do you maintain those emotions which people perceive as positive? Because, as you said, if people come back, reincarnate, to help others, aren't they still caught in the cycle of thinking their desires and motivations are themselves?
Is there a difference between escaping from all desire; and desiring to help others escape from desire? I see the latter as still being caught in the chain of dependent origination.
I'm not a Hindu, or a Buddhist though. Maybe I'm missing something?
~ Wandering Scribe