It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RizeorDie
Like I said kiddo, Iran will not harm anyone leaving Islam as long as they keep it to themselves
but if you start inviting others to join you thats when you'll get executed.
Iranian pastor Yousef Nadarkhani had proved his "apostasy" by "organizing evangelistic meetings and inviting others to Christianity, establishing a house church, baptizing people, expressing his faith to others and, denying Islamic values.
Iran Court: 'Pastor To Be Executed By Hanging'
Originally posted by ollncasino
The Public Order Act 1986 section 5 outlaws threatening, abusive and insulting words or behaviour.
When John Terry, the England football team captain, was alleged to have said something racist to another footballer, the police maintained they had a legal duty to investigate the case because someone had telephoned them and complained.
John Terry to face criminal charges over alleged racist abuse
Yet apparently, calling for the torture of homosexuals or the death of those who insult Muhammad appears to not be a hate crime?
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by RizeorDie
The Abbasids held the Quran in one hand and the sword in the other hand, then they begun imprisoning and poisoning the grandchildren of the prophet Mohammed
A sword in one hand the Koran in the other?
That sounds like Muhammad to me. He did fight 8 major battles conquering the Arabian peninsula.
HistoryNet
• At Kheibar in 628 C.E., the Muslim army was 2,000 combatants.
• When Muhammad mounted his assault on Mecca (630 C.E.) he did so with 10,000 men.
• And at the Battle of Hunayn a few months later the army numbered 12,000.
Source: Islamic Imperialism: A History by Karsh, E. (2007)
Originally posted by RizeorDie
finish it off and tell us why each and every battle started, was it offensive or defensive? what were the objectives?
and most importantly, is it similar to the Islamic conquests which followed by the so called Caliphs?
regards
Originally posted by stumason
Was it the Public Order Act he was charged under? I believe it was actually under section 28 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.. Never the less, the point you are making is the Police were obliged to investigate as someone made a complaint..
Originally posted by stumason
Now, this brings me onto my point, which is have YOU made a complaint about these preachers on their Radio/TV shows (or anyone else for that matter).. If a complaint is made, they have to investigate it. It's no good bleating about only White folk being charged with these offences when no-one has actually made a criminal complaint againt thse Asian folk.
Don't get me wrong, I find their behaviour totally at odds with our society, but they play by the rules and kick up a stink if we give them grief (by making those complaints), why not do it back instead of complaining on an internet forum?
Why are the police turning a blind eye to such incidents? Previously, in the UK, under the Public Order Act 1986 section 5 • A Christian was charged for calling homosexuality a sin. • Another Christian couple were charged for calling Muhammad a warlord and stating a burqa was oppressive. • Another man was charged for calling scientology a cult.
Originally posted by MysterX
I don't see this as a Muslim / Christian issue. In reality it's not a religious issue at all.
It's a criminal issue.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
3. The prophet Muhammad had never put anyone to death for criticising him during his lifetime,
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
3. The prophet Muhammad had never put anyone to death for criticising him during his lifetime,
Aṣmāʼ bint Marwān (Arabic: عصماء بنت مروان "'Asmā' the daughter of Marwān") comes to mind ...
Muhammads Dead Poets Society
Yet apparently, calling for the torture of homosexuals or the death of those who insult Muhammad appears to not be a hate crime?
• A Christian was charged for calling homosexuality a sin.
• Another Christian couple were charged for calling Muhammad a warlord and stating a burqa was oppressive.
• Another man was charged for calling scientology a cult.
Like I said kiddo, Iran will not harm anyone leaving Islam as long as they keep it to themselves but if you start inviting others to join you thats when you'll get executed.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Robbing caravens was a way of life back then, the way present day bankers rob depositors. It was no crime.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Very much was told of his conquest upon Medina with thousands of troops, but the truth was that in the end, Medina opened its gates to the prophet, and no blood was side by both sides.