It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ColCurious
reply to post by chasingbrahman
No.
Not every state with a social state principle has to follow this trajectory.
The social state priciniple per se is a wonderful thing, but only if implemented correctly and in a state that can afford it.edit on 6-2-2013 by ColCurious because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by tothetenthpower
My standard responses tend to go ignored, but I'll repeat;
Austerity measure, NOW!
The American "concept" cannot maintain it's current level of spending if it wants to survive. Taxes are not the answer. Cut spending. Cut entitlements. Cut benefits.
People are going to have to fend for themselves and not rely on government to take care of them. If we don't do Sequestration now, if we don't make serious cuts now, then what we are seeing is the last decade of America.
In my humble opinion.
Originally posted by xedocodex
reply to post by jibeho
They are linked. Stagnant income and bottomless spending means that the govt. needs to tap the taxpayers even more at the same time nearly 50% pay zero federal income tax. Thereby reducing income further with no end in sight as the pinching and choking of the middle class continues. Gotta reign in spending chief .. We are completely out of balance....
Taxes isn't what is responsible for stagnating household income. It's a false argument to try to derail the topic and not admit where the real issue is.
Corporate profits are up, Productivity is up...why isn't income up as well?
To address this problem, you would have to admit that our capitalist system is being gamed by those at the top to create a huge income gap. You would have to admit that the GOP caters to corporations and fights for them to get more tax breaks and benefits. You would have to admit that you and other GOP supporters are voting directly against your own interests and the only person you have to blame for your own misfortunes is yourself.
But that is hard to do...admit to your faults...so instead, you blame the governmentedit on 6-2-2013 by xedocodex because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by chasingbrahman
Originally posted by ColCurious
reply to post by chasingbrahman
No.
Not every state with a social state principle has to follow this trajectory.
The social state priciniple per se is a wonderful thing, but only if implemented correctly and in a state that can afford it.edit on 6-2-2013 by ColCurious because: (no reason given)
Well color me interested!
In what country has the bottom-heavy welfare class been carried by its working, middle and upper classes for longer than four or five decades?