It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In an interview with OMNI magazine in 1980, he said that he believed these craft to come from a “technologically advanced civilization.” He went on to say, “From my association with aircraft and spacecraft, I think I have a pretty good idea of what everyone on this planet has and their performance capabilities, and I’m sure some of the UFOs at least are not from anywhere on Earth.”
Originally posted by Advantage
Help an ATSer out, wouldja?? If we can, take it from the basics for a newbie to the subject. As if it was someone you wanted to open the subject up to...
What UFOs?
Originally posted by skyblueworld
For me, the eyebrow began to rise when I first heard Gordon Cooper say this...
In an interview with OMNI magazine in 1980, he said that he believed these craft to come from a “technologically advanced civilization.” He went on to say, “From my association with aircraft and spacecraft, I think I have a pretty good idea of what everyone on this planet has and their performance capabilities, and I’m sure some of the UFOs at least are not from anywhere on Earth.”
Gordon Cooper UFO-related stories
2008 Note-of-Interest: Why Would Cooper Tell Such Tales?
Reply to Cohen critique (2003)
Cooper saves shuttle with relayed telepathic warning from space aliens
Cooper’s Gemini Stories Versus NASA History Archives
Cooper’s Imaginary Gemini-5 Meteor Attack
Cooper Garbles McDivitt’s UFO Story
Massive Effort To Locate Cooper UFO Report
1997 - Wall Street Journal on Cooper’s Business Disasters
1984 - The Hunt For Gordon Cooper's UFOs
Area 51 and Gordon Coopers "Confiscated Camera"
I agree with the charlatans trying to sell their books, and while Haines doesn't belong on the "hall of shame" with those guys, I nonetheless still find him somewhat biased and find problems with some of his statements analyses and conclusions as a result...same with Bruce Maccabee. They are OK as sources to consult, but not completely trustworthy sources of truth.
Originally posted by gortex
reply to post by Advantage
Most of the so called experts in this field are not to be trusted as they generally just spout rubbish to sell their latest book , there are some who retain credibility and in my view Dr. Richard F. Haines is one of those .
Great Interview with Dr Richard Haines
“Although I do not yet have enough reliable information concerning the relevant characteristics of the UFO phenomenon with which to form a scientific judgment of its “core” identity, I do believe that the phenomenon is objectively real; i.e., I believe that the many thousands of eyewitnesses around the world are experiencing UFO phenomenon in a manner very similar to the way any other human with normal sensory capabilities would perceive it if they happened to be present.”
Dr Richard Haines, NASA Research Scientist (Gemini, Apollo, Skylab)
As I'm sure you know, Dr Hynek came to believe that some UFOs were not of this world, but he found that pilots made poor witnesses to such events. It has been suggested that perhaps it is the safety issue that causes pilots to tend to interpret observations in a manner that promotes the safety of their aircraft and crew and passengers, even if those interpretations are erroneous. Pilots tend to be good at identifying known aircraft but poor at identifying unknown objects especially astronomical objects according to Dr Hynek.
Originally posted by karl 12
There's a link here to a recent presentation Dr Haines gave to the French Air and Space Academy on the subject of UAP and aviation safety - can I ask you if you think aviation safety is a relevant factor to the UFO subject?
In audio recordings of communications between air traffic control and pilots I've listened to, it is apparent that pilots have the difficulty described by Hynek. Other people in the recordings even identified the objects that the pilots were seeing, and the pilots still considered them unidentified, after dismissing the obviously correct identifications.
One of the world’s first genuine UFO investigators, Allen Hynek of Northwestern University, came to believe that some encounters really could have otherworldly causes. But he was much more skeptical about the reliability of pilot testimony. "Surprisingly, commercial and military pilots appear to make relatively poor witnesses," he wrote in "The Hynek UFO Report."
Hynek found that the best class of witnesses had a 50 percent misperception rate, but that pilots had a much higher rate: 88 percent for military pilots, 89 percent for commercial pilots, the worst of all categories listed. Pilots could be counted on for an accurate identification of familiar objects — such as aircraft and ground structures — but Hynek said "it should come as no surprise that the majority of pilot misidentifications were of astronomical objects."
I didn't have anybody in mind...I haven't found anybody who is completely unbiased. Everyone seems to be biased one way or the other.
Also you mentioned 'completely trustworthy sources of truth' in regard to the UFO subject, can I ask who you had in mind?
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I didn't have anybody in mind...I haven't found anybody who is completely unbiased. Everyone seems to be biased one way or the other.
Toxicsurf
Or listen to some podcasts, either on ATS or,
The Paracast
Dark Matters Radio
Binnall of America
Radio Misterioso
...to name a few....