It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OptimusSubprime
It kind of makes you wonder... perhaps we are just a creation sitting on a table in a lab somewhere.
Originally posted by Northwarden
Can they be shielded from outside scanning, and if so, could they harbour dangerous micro- or nanotech
Not really. The paper says "look similar to".
Originally posted by OptimusSubprime
This is pretty cool... the first multiverse created in a lab.
(emphasis added by me)
Thus, thermal fluctuations in a ferrofluid look similar to creation and disappearance of individual Minkowski spacetimes (universes) in the cosmological multiverse.
“The idea of time being the fourth dimension of space did not bring much progress in physics and is in contradiction with the formalism of special relativity,” he said. “We are now developing a formalism of 3D quantum space based on Planck's work. It seems that the Universe is 3D from the macro to the micro level to the Planck volume, which per formalism is 3D. In this 3D space there is no ‘length contraction,’ there is no ‘time dilation.’ What really exists is that the velocity of material change is ‘relative’ in the Einstein sense.”
Originally posted by daskakik
reply to post by Arbitrageur
Not only is it "looks similar" but what it looks similar to is "Minkowski spacetime" so it "looks similar to a model of the universe". One which may be incorrect.
"Spacetime has No Time Dimension"
“The idea of time being the fourth dimension of space did not bring much progress in physics and is in contradiction with the formalism of special relativity,” he said. “We are now developing a formalism of 3D quantum space based on Planck's work. It seems that the Universe is 3D from the macro to the micro level to the Planck volume, which per formalism is 3D. In this 3D space there is no ‘length contraction,’ there is no ‘time dilation.’ What really exists is that the velocity of material change is ‘relative’ in the Einstein sense.”
Originally posted by Northwarden
It's very cool science at work, I won't deny. I don't like the possible complications it could pose for us in the future, and have questions.
Are the newly created multiverses stable, and if so, could they be used to hide nanofactories once they come into production within the next decade, as predicted?
Can they be shielded from outside scanning, and if so, could they harbour dangerous micro- or nanotech with impunity?
Originally posted by CryHavoc
Originally posted by OptimusSubprime
It kind of makes you wonder... perhaps we are just a creation sitting on a table in a lab somewhere.
Careful now. You don't want to start a religion talking like that...
Originally posted by Dfairlite
reply to post by jiggerj
Magic bearded man, that's what people have painted. You are correct, except he isn't a scientist as he has full understanding (not much science to be done). Magic is the word atheists use to discredit theists beliefs, except we don't believe in magic. Imagine going back in time to the days of constantin, trying to explain to him a live television broadcast of the moon landing or receiving video from the mars rover. The intracacies of understanding they'd need to comprehend such a device would be nearly impossible to explain to them in a lifetime, and even if you succeeded explaining it, their mental capacity would probably not be able to comprehend what you're explaining and they probably wouldn't believe you. If they did believe you and tried to tell their friends, they'd probably describe it as... magic.
Whose to say this life here isn't just the test that religion has made it out to be? Whose to say that they're not up there in the lab watching us take this test? Whose to say the final judgement isn't exactly like being graded on an exam, if we don't pass we're booted out of the school?
I've never understood how an atheist can put so much faith in man to discredit creationism when man is striving to confirm creationism by creating it ourselves. It's amazing isn't it?edit on 2-2-2013 by Dfairlite because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Dfairlite
I've never understood how an atheist can put so much faith in man to discredit creationism when man is striving to confirm creationism by creating it ourselves. It's amazing isn't it?
Originally posted by Dfairlite
reply to post by jiggerj
Whose to say this life here isn't just the test that religion has made it out to be? Whose to say that they're not up there in the lab watching us take this test? Whose to say the final judgement isn't exactly like being graded on an exam, if we don't pass we're booted out of the school?
Originally posted by jiggerj
I've been saying for a while that this universe being created by a scientist is a lot more logical than being created by some mystical magical being.
Originally posted by rickymouse
:shk: yeah right, man created a multiverse