It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LightAssassin
reply to post by comfortablynumb
Good work Cairns.
I've petitioned Adelaide politicians and I keep getting the same rhetoric.
Hopefully that will filter down to us in Adelaide (the idea....not the water, lol)
LNP MP Jason Woodforth last year said there was broad backbench support for the fluoride to be outlawed completely, telling the ABC it was a proven neurotoxin.
That was despite warnings from the Australian Dental Association that would cause major dental health problems.
I don't get it?
Originally posted by NuclearPaul
Love this comment too:
That was despite warnings from the Australian Dental Association that would cause major dental health problems.
What's the matter dental industry? Scared you'll make too much money? Or are you pretending that you care about us?
I think if profit is their only motive, they would want more dental problems so they can get more customers and make more money.
Originally posted by Gedo:Rinne Tensei
Why would dentists want you to not have dental problems?
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I don't get it?
Originally posted by NuclearPaul
Love this comment too:
That was despite warnings from the Australian Dental Association that would cause major dental health problems.
What's the matter dental industry? Scared you'll make too much money? Or are you pretending that you care about us?
If dentists are going to get more work and make more money, why would they object to that?
What are their real priorities? What is the conspiracy? Who are they really trying to benefit. Someone, please explain.
I think if profit is their only motive, they would want more dental problems so they can get more customers and make more money.
Originally posted by Gedo:Rinne Tensei
Why would dentists want you to not have dental problems?
The only reason I can think of why they might feel otherwise is if they actually cared about the welfare of their patients.
Of course this is the same industry that used toxic materials in metal fillings, which is a debatable health and safety topic also.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by comfortablynumb
Originally posted by zarlaan
Those people would have nobody to blame but themselves if that's the case. Fluoride in toothpaste isn't even necessary. People just need to learn to stop consuming so much sugar, processed foods and just brush their teeth regularly.
There's that and there is also the fact that Fluoride in the water is being ingested whereas you're not meant to swallow toothpaste, I think it's OK in toothpaste but when we're told to drink 3L of water a day, we're ingesting Fluoride daily...perhaps in small doses, but over time who knows.
I can't get away from the first paragraph in the article where the council says it is "involuntary medication". This is a huge statement.
No it's not. They are not saying it has a negative effect, they are saying it has a positive one, but they can not involuntarily give it to people. Much like they can't help pain by putting aspirin in the water. It needs to be left up to the people how they care for themselves. Why do you think it's a huge statement?