It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lucid Lunacy
reply to post by david99118
if a particular group or organization doesn't conform with popular opinion,
If you want to call it that. I call it being modern. The world is evolving in the moral landscape. Keep up.
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
Imagine, being kicked out of an organisation because you cant help but be attracted to the same gender, We'll be laughing about this in 20 years
i would much rather be oppressed by the government than a lowbrow sheep like you.
and i guarantee that if some GLBT group was purposely excluding straights, you would completely support them.
filth like you need to be taken out back.
its called tyranny of the majority. if they were doing this of their own free will, i would not see a problem with it.
Originally posted by david99118
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
Imagine, being kicked out of an organisation because you cant help but be attracted to the same gender, We'll be laughing about this in 20 years
yep, laughing over the fact we stupidly allowed excessive diversity to ruin our country. anything beyond genetic diversity is always destructive. good god Americans are so bleeding stupid.
Originally posted by CyberneticProphet
More homosexual infiltration in youth organizations to push their deviant lifestyle choice on society and brainwash the young to lead them to Hell.
Hopefully the true Boy Scouts who stand for the Christian God and Country will split from this wickedness and form their own godly organization.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
reply to post by Domo1
I err on the side of our Natural right to freely associate and the ability to decide who that association is with. If the private group known as the Boy Scouts wants to exclude people, they should very well have every right to do so (but as mentioned before; how do you determine if someone is 'gay' -- for lack of a better word)? This is akin to politicians and the news sticking their noses into Augusta (in case you are not aware, they excluded women).
If I want to have a group that only lets in one-legged people, I very well shouldn't have to worry about being vilified in the media for my choice in membership limits.
Here is a solution: Don't like how the group operates? Start your own that does allow gay people/kids to join....unless of course your agenda is to have it your way; which this is what it is about.
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
I'm really surprised by your response. You wouldn't let your son join the scouts if they admitted gay kids? You said it yourself, your son is around gay kids already. He will grow up and have to deal with gay people. In what way do you think accepting gay participants would ruin the experience of scouts? Is it really just about sticking to your guns?
If they let gays have their way, you will be teaching young boys how to grow up to be sissy's with an identity crisis.
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
Im pretty sure there are many competing groups that can offer the same services as BSOA - And they're aware of this. Those competing groups will grow and grow, maybe even merge and become Real competition. Im not so sure BSOA would like to loose their stake, even worse, be remembered for "That group that couldn't get over the fact that some guys like guys"
Originally posted by FlyersFan
The Boy Scouts are a privately run organization. They can ban or not ban as they wish. They can run their (church oriented) groups as they wish. However, I'm glad to see that they are moving in the direction of lifting the ban.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
Im pretty sure there are many competing groups that can offer the same services as BSOA - And they're aware of this. Those competing groups will grow and grow, maybe even merge and become Real competition. Im not so sure BSOA would like to loose their stake, even worse, be remembered for "That group that couldn't get over the fact that some guys like guys"
There is a prominent one already that is inclusive; so why not just go to them? Camp Fire USA bills themselves as such a "scouting" type club. My point being, if there is a viable alternative, why force the BSoA to fit what you want? If BSoA is moving towards inclusiveness because they want to, I am all for it. If they are doing so because select individuals feel it is their lot in life to force others to accept their views on life, I am against it.