It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What kind of dumbass god would place intelligent lifeforms within certain galaxies and then set up laws of nature that ensured these galaxies were hurtling away from each other at speeds that could never be overcome, thus guaranteeing his favoured created lifeforms never got to meet each other? edit on 30-1-2013 by IvanAstikov because: typical typo
Originally posted by dannydav
already a thread about this
www.abovetopsecret.com...
My thread was started about 20 hours before that one
Originally posted by ~widowmaker~
reply to post by wmd_2008
nah , im pretty damn sure you arent going to get hubble quality pictures with a 25 dollar kids telescope lol
anyways, it was a crappy xmas gift lol
well i did get to see moon up close and it is cool to see some details a little bit more than with naked eye, but nowhere near as cool as owning the thing that can make those pics lol.
p.s going to school for art. i see colors that arent even there ^^
Originally posted by ~widowmaker~
reply to post by ethang10
whats really sad is we dont need money to achieve this but the will of man, sadly, that has been lost a long time ago.
Originally posted by jeep3r
Those images of clusters and nebulas are mind-blowing whenever I see them. Even though the colors are just representations of gases and materials that scientists interpret or measure to be in those areas, it is still a beautiful and spectacular sight. At the same time it makes us wonder why on earth there has been no 'contact' with anybody as of yet ...
Originally posted by wmd_2008
What makes you say they are representations of whats there, the GAS is there the colours depend on what was used to photograph them and what the detector/sensor was sensitive to ie visible , ir , uv light etc.
Originally posted by jeep3r
Originally posted by wmd_2008
What makes you say they are representations of whats there, the GAS is there the colours depend on what was used to photograph them and what the detector/sensor was sensitive to ie visible , ir , uv light etc.
Hmmm ... I got that wrong, didn't I? Sorry for that, but I was referring to an earlier post by cody599 on page 1 of this thread. He mentioned that he didn't want to ruin the magic, but that the images are 'not' exactly representing what's there. What it comes down to is probably, that the clusters would look different to the 'naked eye' ... obviously I'm not an expert in this field, but thanks again for the explanation!
Originally posted by wmd_2008
That's ok but looking through even very large telescopes you would get very little hint of the colours , many pictures from hubble are over many mins/hours and amateur astrophotographers will take many images and use staking software to bring out detail and colour.