It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by paratus
Where are they practicing for?
And where in current active theaters are there buildings taller than 15 stories that would warrant this need?
Just saying.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by paratus
Where are they practicing for?
And where in current active theaters are there buildings taller than 15 stories that would warrant this need?
Just saying.
There is only one damn place I can think of outside of Mainland China.
Iran.
They ARE using high power military radar/ thermal imaging / night vision / Infra Red targeting lasers on people on the ground......too bad those people didn't have RIGHTS....otherwise they wouldn't be getting blasted by the unseen directed energy/radar.
Originally posted by Sly1one
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
I don't know if they are trying to desensitize people to this or what...and if so why? Its a BIG step to start conducting these exercises over major cities...it takes some brass ones to make that decision and accept all the potential liability behind it...
won't be long before some kind of mishap or accident turns everyone's eye to the "necessity" of this...accidentally loading live rounds instead of blanks...or just a black hawk crash into one of those large buildings. People will start asking how necessary it is to do these training exercises over a mass population...
and since when was the military in need of training for metropolis areas? They plan on invading/defending/patrolling a major city anytime soon?
It looks odd, sounds odd, and feels....odd to me...
Originally posted by ipsedixit
If this kind of thing happened in Canada there would be hell to pay in Parliament and people's heads would roll. The idea that a military "drill" of this sort would be conducted over a major urban area is beyond belief.
Incidentally under US pressure customs officers at the Toronto Island airport involved in preclearance for US bound travellers might be outfitted with sidearms. This is unprecedented for Canada and is strictly related to the escalating security protocols enforced in the US. The Toronto police chief is recommending against it, which kind of shows that Canada still has feet planted in the pre-Orwellian world.
edit on 28-1-2013 by ipsedixit because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sean
After all that has been going on with shootings and gun bans, they do a exercise drill shooting blanks from a helicopter over the population. Last time I heard discharge of a firearm in city limits is a against the law. Time to call the Sheriffs department.
790.15 Discharging firearm in public.—
(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) or subsection (3), any person who knowingly discharges a firearm in any public place or on the right-of-way of any paved public road, highway, or street or whosoever knowingly discharges any firearm over the right-of-way of any paved public road, highway, or street or over any occupied premises is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. This section does not apply to a person lawfully defending life or property or performing official duties requiring the discharge of a firearm or to a person discharging a firearm on public roads or properties expressly approved for hunting by the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission or Division of Forestry.