It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by juleol
reply to post by Mamatus
The discussion is about the effect of co2 though and not the urban heat island effect which the pro warmists loves to ignore when us skeptics bring it up.
The so called consensus claims that this effect is too weak to even affect weather stations even though they are pretty much sitting right ontop black asphalt.
And again co2 is not pollution.
I would also like to see anyone explain why co2 is mostly lagging behind temperatures and not the other way. I would also like to know why we had ice ages starting even when co2 levels was in thousands of ppm range which is supposed to be way higher than what is supposed to cause a runaway greenhouse effect.
There is just no evidence for the current warming being mostly from co2.
And now we got yet another study that contradict previous claims: link
Originally posted by chenjesu
Originally posted by juleol
reply to post by Mamatus
The discussion is about the effect of co2 though and not the urban heat island effect which the pro warmists loves to ignore when us skeptics bring it up.
The so called consensus claims that this effect is too weak to even affect weather stations even though they are pretty much sitting right ontop black asphalt.
And again co2 is not pollution.
I would also like to see anyone explain why co2 is mostly lagging behind temperatures and not the other way. I would also like to know why we had ice ages starting even when co2 levels was in thousands of ppm range which is supposed to be way higher than what is supposed to cause a runaway greenhouse effect.
There is just no evidence for the current warming being mostly from co2.
And now we got yet another study that contradict previous claims: link
I don't usually post here, i come here to lurk and read news i can't find elsewhere. I'm on neither side of this argument as i believe its both the fault of humans and nature that climate change exists.
But i digress...
Your so called source is a BLOG hosted by some low ranking meteorologist. Hes not even a certified broadcast meteorologist. I guess we can use posts from ATS or hell even 4chan as sources now.
Willard Anthony Watts (Anthony Watts) is a blogger, weathercaster and non-scientist, paid AGW denier who runs the website wattsupwiththat.com. He does not have a university qualification and has no climate credentials other than being a radio weather announcer. His website is parodied and debunked at the website wottsupwiththat.com Watts is on the payroll of the Heartland Institute, which itself is funded by polluting industries.
Nice source LOL
edit on 27-1-2013 by chenjesu because: (no reason given)edit on 27-1-2013 by chenjesu because: (no reason given)edit on 27-1-2013 by chenjesu because: /quote type and adding edit line.edit on 27-1-2013 by chenjesu because: (no reason given)
And the same thing can be said about you right. So WTH do you know about anything? Nothin.
Originally posted by chenjesu
And the same thing can be said about you right. So WTH do you know about anything? Nothin.
You are discrediting my discreditation by saying LOL NO YOUR WRONG?
im just trying to get the facts straight here.
Originally posted by opethPA
Extreme weather is nothing new, it has most likely been going on since the birth of the planet and will continue that way until the end.
A few weeks ago I posted this thread about a 49 degree fluctuation in 2 minutes from 1943
www.abovetopsecret.com...edit on 27-1-2013 by opethPA because: (no reason given)
The Year Without a Summer (also known as the Poverty Year, The Summer that Never Was, Year There Was No Summer and Eighteen Hundred and Froze to Death[1]) was 1816, in which severe summer climate abnormalities caused average global temperatures to decrease by 0.4–0.7 °C (0.7–1.3 °F),[2] resulting in major food shortages across the Northern Hemisphere.[3][4] It is believed that the anomaly was caused by a combination of a historic low in solar activity with a volcanic winter event
In July and August, lake and river ice were observed as far south as Pennsylvania. Rapid, dramatic temperature swings were common, with temperatures sometimes reverting from normal or above-normal summer temperatures as high as 95 °F (35 °C) to near-freezing within hours.
Originally posted by Mamatus
Originally posted by chenjesu
And the same thing can be said about you right. So WTH do you know about anything? Nothin.
You are discrediting my discreditation by saying LOL NO YOUR WRONG?
im just trying to get the facts straight here.
You are wasting your time on this one.... Deniers will ignore evidence that is undeniable. When confronted with truth they often respond just like he did. They will quote sources that are flawed, all the while not realizing that it is not just the source that is flawed.
Originally posted by Juggernog
Yep, 75 down here in South Texas.. Sure its usually in the 50s or so in Jan but ive seen it like this before as well.
Hell, in 04 it snowed here, on christmas no less.. It hadnt snowed here in decades prior to that.
Originally posted by watchitburn
The climate has been changing since it started.
You can blame whoever you want.
But, don't fool yourself into thinking there was ever anything anyone could ever do to stop or "turn it around"
It's called Nature, and humans have no say in the matter.
Originally posted by winofiend
Originally posted by watchitburn
The climate has been changing since it started.
You can blame whoever you want.
But, don't fool yourself into thinking there was ever anything anyone could ever do to stop or "turn it around"
It's called Nature, and humans have no say in the matter.
Yes we do.
We have a say in how much muck we throw into it. God, it's as if you think it doesn't make a difference.
Well, the house may be getting hotter and there is nothing we can do about it, but there is no damn reason to sit inside it throwing burning paper at the floor and going "Woo hoo hoo nothing we can do..."
I guess if you decide that you're going to get cancer anyway, you may as well smoke 50 cigars a day.
sheesh.
The Carboniferous Period and the Ordovician Period were the only geological periods during the Paleozoic Era when global temperatures were as low as they are today. To the consternation of global warming proponents, the Late Ordovician Period was also an Ice Age while at the same time CO2 concentrations then were nearly 12 times higher than today-- 4400 ppm. According to greenhouse theory, Earth should have been exceedingly hot. Instead, global temperatures were no warmer than today. Clearly, other factors besides atmospheric carbon influence earth temperatures and global warming.