It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by NJoyZ
She couldn't have taken the mark. It's not instituted until the mid-way point of Daniel's 70th week by the antichrist.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
Originally posted by HoneyBe
It's up to you I suppose?? If it's in your mind or your intent, then sure.....why not? I don't really think drawing images on paper can be compared to a body tattoo and plus....you aren't "famous"....or......maybe you are?
Why does the difference matter? If I draw it on a paper or on my skin? Also, why does it matter if I am famous or not? I am not seeing this connection here. So she has a triangle on herself; my wife has a crab in a fantasitc spot representing her zodiac, maybe she is the anti-Christ or whatever.....I am just not seeing how this all works.
Originally posted by HoneyBe
reply to post by NJoyZ
Interesting observation! Maybe someone willing to tattoo a triangle or pyramid symbol on their right hand is also willing to take the "true" mark of the beast when it comes?
Originally posted by Quyll
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Can you please explain this more? I'm not understanding what you mean.
Also, this is an incredibly interesting topic that could go either way. That would be very bad if she carried the mark.
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by NJoyZ
Well, if we're letting go of logic for a moment and talking of biblical prophecies then I would have to go with the idea that the human body this god gave us to live in is a temple. When we willingly defile our bodies in any way, this would be the mark of the beast.
Tattoos and piercings means you have turned away from god and have accepted Satan.edit on 1/26/2013 by jiggerj because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Quyll
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Can you please explain this more? I'm not understanding what you mean.
Also, this is an incredibly interesting topic that could go either way. That would be very bad if she carried the mark.
The seven-year period of time that the antichrist is supposed to be on Earth is called Daniel's 70th week. From the 70 weeks prophecy given to Daniel by Gabriel in Daniel 9. Which Christ also alluded to in Matthew 24 as the key to the end of this age. The last 3 1/2 years of that 7-year period is called the "great tribulation" by Christ. Which begins when the antichrist sits in the temple and declares to be God, Jesus Christ, demands worship, institutes the "mark", and kills anyone who refuses.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
The third temple to be built one day in Jerusalem. The one the temple institute is planning to build at this moment
Originally posted by AngryCymraeg
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
The third temple to be built one day in Jerusalem. The one the temple institute is planning to build at this moment
Oh, yes, I've heard of those nutters. They want to build it on Temple Mount, which would be the monumentally stupid idea ever, as it would start a massive regional war.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
It's supposed to be built soon AFTER a 'massive regional war' that is won handily by Israel. Israel's enemies will be decimated in that war and won't have the resources to stop them.
Originally posted by particlezen
reply to post by jiggerj
By this logic, so would cutting or dyeing your hair, shaving, having the wrong kind of hat, wearing makeup, getting a suntan, or taking medication.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by AngryCymraeg
The prophecies say noting about one man in 10. Her enemies during the Gog/Magog war will be decimated. The person who revives those armies will be the antichrist, but it takes many years to restock the weapons of war to do so. Israel builds the temple in the advantageous time after the war victory.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
That's absurd. If that's the case then technically so are people who don't go outside with at minimum 25 SPF sunscreen on, since likewise they are damaging their skin cells by UV rays.
Originally posted by particlezen
reply to post by jiggerj
By this logic, so would cutting or dyeing your hair, shaving, having the wrong kind of hat, wearing makeup, getting a suntan, or taking medication.
14 “In days to come, when your children ask you, ‘What does this mean?’ say to them, ‘With a mighty hand the Lord brought us out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery. 15 When Pharaoh stubbornly refused to let us go, the Lord killed the firstborn of both people and animals in Egypt. This is why I sacrifice to the Lord the first male offspring of every womb and redeem each of my firstborn sons.’ 16 And it will be like
a sign on your hand and a symbol on your forehead
”