It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
SPF 15 filters out approximately 93 percent of all incoming UVB rays. SPF 30 keeps out 97 percent and SPF 50 keeps out 98 percent.
Well the sun hasn't changed in the last 20 years.
Originally posted by Shema
And you have to ask yourself why would sunlight be harmful to humans, or animals for that matter. What could be more naturally healthy than sunlight? I never did believe their bulls##t from day one and you couldn't pay me money to smear that chemical crap over my body. This is one subject that always makes me see red so excuse the heat.edit on 25-1-2013 by Shema because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by JiggyPotamus
I dunno, I think you may be wrong here. If the cells of the body are bombarded by too much radiation, they are going to mutate or break down, which basically equates to damage. Cancer is basically a conglomeration of mutated cells if I'm not mistaken, so I do not see why sunlight could not cause cancer. I do not really know one way or the other, but that seems like a logical assumption that I just made.
Originally posted by Anjola
Originally posted by JiggyPotamus
I dunno, I think you may be wrong here. If the cells of the body are bombarded by too much radiation, they are going to mutate or break down, which basically equates to damage. Cancer is basically a conglomeration of mutated cells if I'm not mistaken, so I do not see why sunlight could not cause cancer. I do not really know one way or the other, but that seems like a logical assumption that I just made.
Sun exposure is to your skin as strength training is to your muscle. When you strength train, your muscle fiber is initially broken down but then rebuilds itself in a stronger, healthier form. This is also the case when your skin is exposed to sunlight - it must first break down in order to rebuild itself and is stronger for this process. Sure, you can do anything too much and cause harm, but sunlight is generally very healthy.
Originally posted by davjan4
I find this interesting. Skinn cancer sunblock correlation?
graemethomasonline.com...edit on 26-1-2013 by davjan4 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by bacci0909
Hah.. I like the people insinuating that it's a disinfo conspiracy to sell sunscreen. If anything, it's a conspiracy to keep us from getting our due amount of Vitamin D, but even that's debatable. Whether Mike Adams & Co. are correct on this one (and I wouldn't doubt if they were, especially with this particular issue), I'd say a Vitamin D defficiency is way more of a contributing factor in getting cancer of any kind than sunlight is.
Originally posted by tgidkp
this is probably correct, and is fairly well accepted within the science community.
sunlight as cause is the short-answer. the long-answer is that sunlight breaks the unstable bonds within toxic organic chemicals at the surface of the skin, causing free radicals.....which then wreak havoc on the cellular structures, resulting in cancer.
a certain degree of toxic overload, combined with sustained sunlight, increses risk significantly.