It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
At its core, Bodyline amounted to a calculated attempt by the English cricketing establishment to attack the Australians - specifically the wunderkind Don Bradman - with brutal, intimidatory, even life-threatening tactics. Read more: www.smh.com.au...
What the Bodyline series showed was that while we refuse to put on airs and graces, Aussies are not a ruthless, ''whatever it takes'' people. Rather, we are a plain-speaking lot, who play hard but fair, and expect no less. Ours is not a gentleman's code; it is a democratic code.
Douglas Jardine had no interest in honouring any such code. By directing his bowlers consistently to target the body, and placing fielders to prevent strokes to defend themselves, not only were life and limb threatened, the spirit of the game was deeply contravened. Obviously what was at stake was a sporting trophy; this was not war.
But Bodyline left a mark on our national consciousness because it symbolised wider issues of the period that actually did in the long run involve our sovereignty.
To understand that we have to put ourselves back in that summer. Australians were in the middle of the Great Depression, with the mass unemployment, homelessness and betrayal of hope that it brought. Australians did not cause that Depression and to a great extent we were powerless to tackle it because we lacked full economic sovereignty. Read more: www.smh.com.au...
At home, our adherence to the gold standard and low foreign exchange reserves made it impossible to increase public spending to raise demand. Even worse, austerity was strongly recommended to us from on-high overseas - largely by English gentlemen whose gentlemanly rules had little interest in the welfare of ordinary Australians. Honouring deals between bankers was more important to them than equal sacrifice from all and fair play for working people.
The result? Catastrophic unemployment and hardship. Australians were mad as hell. So when Jardine bent the moral code to win at all costs, people joined the dots. It was only cricket, but it was typical. It symbolised the need for a new assertion of national sovereignty underpinned by the democratic rather than the gentlemanly values - to play hard, within the rules, to look after each other. Read more: www.smh.com.au...
I believe Bodyline caused many Australians to wake up to the urgent need of making Australia's interests our No.1 priority and to do so in a typically Australian egalitarian manner. Bodyline played a big role in embedding a sense of independence and a desire for true sovereignty in Australia's international outlook. It did not invent these ideas that had surfaced at various points in Australia's past - but it amplified them and took them in new directions. Wartime Labor prime ministers John Curtin and Ben Chifley were heavily influenced by the awakening of egalitarian national sentiment that followed the Depression, and it informed their determination to stand up for the country's defence interests.
Today Australia stands almost alone in having stayed out of recession during the most significant global downturn since that Great Depression. This in part speaks to an enduring determination for our country never again to be at the whim of anyone who claims an inherent right to make and break the rules at our expense. Read more: www.smh.com.au...
Originally posted by alldaylong
Australia needs nothing from England? (It's Great Britain actually). All they needed from "England" was the heroism and endeavour of the British People who built Australia in the first place. Or have you forgotten where you came from?
Originally posted by Kryties
reply to post by alldaylong
What? You lot floated us out here in chains and left us to our own devices.
On 29 April 1770, Botany Bay was the site of James Cook's first landing of HMS Endeavour on the continent of Australia, after his extensive navigation of New Zealand. Later the British planned Botany Bay as the site for a penal colony. Out of these plans came the first European habitation of Australia at Sydney Cove.
Originally posted by alldaylong
Australia needs nothing from England? (It's Great Britain actually). All they needed from "England" was the heroism and endeavour of the British People who built Australia in the first place. Or have you forgotten where you came from?
Originally posted by stuntmanbob
Originally posted by alldaylong
Australia needs nothing from England? (It's Great Britain actually). All they needed from "England" was the heroism and endeavour of the British People who built Australia in the first place. Or have you forgotten where you came from?
Yeah, changed my mind... Ha!
Free settlers from all over the world built Australia. And Australians have hated pommies ever since Eureka Stockade. Its nothing new. Wonder why...edit on 25-1-2013 by stuntmanbob because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by HelenConway
Originally posted by alldaylong
Australia needs nothing from England? (It's Great Britain actually). All they needed from "England" was the heroism and endeavour of the British People who built Australia in the first place. Or have you forgotten where you came from?
australia is very multicultural these days only about 30 plus percent will be of British origin within the next twenty years. Australia is having an identity crisis.
And stop calling us POMS it is very insulting.
Originally posted by stuntmanbob
Originally posted by HelenConway
Originally posted by alldaylong
Australia needs nothing from England? (It's Great Britain actually). All they needed from "England" was the heroism and endeavour of the British People who built Australia in the first place. Or have you forgotten where you came from?
australia is very multicultural these days only about 30 plus percent will be of British origin within the next twenty years. Australia is having an identity crisis.
And stop calling us POMS it is very insulting.
Redcoats?
I dont think anyone knows what pommy actually means. Im sure its not so bad.
Originally posted by stuntmanbob
reply to post by Flavian
But Im sure of all nations Australia hates the Poms the most.
Originally posted by stuntmanbob
Originally posted by alldaylong
Australia needs nothing from England? (It's Great Britain actually). All they needed from "England" was the heroism and endeavour of the British People who built Australia in the first place. Or have you forgotten where you came from?
Yeah, changed my mind... Ha!
Free settlers from all over the world built Australia. And Australians have hated pommies ever since Eureka Stockade. Its nothing new. Wonder why...edit on 25-1-2013 by stuntmanbob because: (no reason given)
I think it means 'pride of mother england'.
Originally posted by stuntmanbob
Originally posted by HelenConway
Originally posted by alldaylong
Australia needs nothing from England? (It's Great Britain actually). All they needed from "England" was the heroism and endeavour of the British People who built Australia in the first place. Or have you forgotten where you came from?
australia is very multicultural these days only about 30 plus percent will be of British origin within the next twenty years. Australia is having an identity crisis.
And stop calling us POMS it is very insulting.
Redcoats?
I dont think anyone knows what pommy actually means. Im sure its not so bad.