It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Rand Paul blames Hillary Clinton for Benghazi

page: 1
8

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 11:47 AM
link   
In addressing comments to Hillary.Rand Paul flat out blames Hillary Clinton for Benghazi.Her neglect of her diuties and attention to other matters led to the out come of the attack.







posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 11:56 AM
link   
What's disgusting is that the ONLY person in prison over this right now is an innocent man who broke no laws, the guy who made the anti-Islam video. There was no protest, nobody had seen the video and here we are are deeper in the ocean of lies. Who gave the talking points? Who thought of these lies when they clearly knew they were lies? Rand says he doesn't question her motives, I sure as hell do.



posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 12:05 PM
link   
Already posted: www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 12:06 PM
link   
reply to post by rockymcgilicutty
 


Hillary Clinton claims she is taking responsibility for what happened; because it was on her watch.

So now what? I have to wonder; does any of this really faze her?



posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 12:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 


I did a search but did not see it.Mods pull the thread please.



posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 12:08 PM
link   
There are more pressing questions to be answered here; for instance, I want to know who to blame for Rand Paul's ridiculous haircut? I hope he got his money back.



posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 12:09 PM
link   
reply to post by Merlin Lawndart
 





What's disgusting is that the ONLY person in prison over this right now is an innocent man who broke no laws


This really bothers me as well,

However, what if he was in on the whole thing, they needed a scapegoat.

And why hasn't anyone heard from him?



posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 12:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by caladonea
reply to post by rockymcgilicutty
 


Hillary Clinton claims she is taking responsibility for what happened; because it was on her watch.

So now what? I have to wonder; does any of this really faze her?


She claims responsibility , but her words and action tell a different story, I don't think she means a word of it.



posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 12:12 PM
link   
reply to post by rockymcgilicutty
 


Reading up on this.
The real culprits are radical muslims.
The CIA did the best they could.

Blaming Clinton for this is just dumb.

Everyone is arm chair quarter backing this. And it's a shame.



posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 12:14 PM
link   
Yesterday the Tea Party Taliban looked like a bunch of Schoolboys trying and failing to outsmart their Headmistress.

From the Fox News conspiracy idea that she was watching the Benghazi attack streaming live, to Rand Paul daydreaming about being President. They just came across as a bunch of petulant children.

Bless their Hearts.



posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 12:20 PM
link   
Well .. Hillary said she takes responsibility so she kinda blames herself for the deaths, right? Isn't he just going along with what she said???



posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 12:21 PM
link   
This has nothing to do with who is responsible ..these are politicians ...nobody really gives a rat's ass about 4 people dying ..they just want to take advantage of the situation ..
I think the Republicans are just out to kill Hillary's chances of being the next President .. and they may have succeeded ..a blemish like that .. only Billy can help to wipe that off ..
They (the Republicans) really have nobody capable of leading or winning ..all ball bags ..
Dems on the other hand ...have a solid Obama, and first woman hopeful Hillary .. and she's still massively popular ..



posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 12:29 PM
link   
reply to post by junglimogli
 





I think the Republicans are just out to kill Hillary's chances of being the next President


Funny, I was kinda thinking that the democrats heaping accolades of praise on her highness was a grand and free political commercial.

Really, knowing what we know about Hillary why would Americans want her as president?


edit on 123131p://bThursday2013 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 12:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by junglimogli
 





I think the Republicans are just out to kill Hillary's chances of being the next President


Funny, I was kinda thinking that the democrats heaping accolades of praise on her highness was a grand and free political commercial.

Really, knowing what we know about Hillary why would Americans want her as president?


edit on 123131p://bThursday2013 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)



Coz the evil you know is better than the evil you don't know ..



posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 01:04 PM
link   
Oh I don't know - Hillary is to blame as far as I'm concerned.
After all, if she hadn't spent a billion dollars on a new embassy in Iraq, and bought new dishes for embassies... maybe there would have been money available to provide security.
On the other hand, it's just a bit of a stretch to blame her boss....
or maybe the CIA director since the compound wasn't as much an embassy as a "safe house" for detaining unlawful combatants.

ganjoa



posted on Jan, 24 2013 @ 03:06 PM
link   
reply to post by rockymcgilicutty
 


Hillary also blamed herself.

Non-story.



new topics

top topics



 
8

log in

join