It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LeLeu
reply to post by iceman22
Doh!
Trumped by the "it's all bull#" theory.
Well played
Originally posted by iceman22
Well you have to admit, its valid alternative perspective isn’t it! Makes one ponder a little deeper anyway.
Originally posted by wildespace
I like it how people in this thread are geology experts who can say "those aren't natural formations", or archeology experts who can say "those are ruins".
/sarcasm
Still, those are very interesting rocks and sediment formations. Make no mistake that there's a whole bunch of geologists looking at the images from Curiosity and making their judgement.
Originally posted by RoScoLaz
interesting stuff. particularly this;
Originally posted by kudegras
I can hear all the skeptics nay-saying most of those pics as natural formations, but one cant be natural and that is the panel.
That has definitely been manufactured by someone and if indeed it is on Mars then either we have been there before or someone who needs to create an artificial barrier ie. wall or door or panel has .
I draw 2 conclusions, either they are not on Mars and are faking the pics for some reason or they are there and have missed this real evidence during one of their photoshop parties.
S & F