It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by antonia
reply to post by IkNOwSTuff
That's just a bad idea. Women have trouble having kids as it is. That would most certainly have to be a c-section. And this is assuming the body even takes it considering the difference in genetic material.
Ethically this wouldn't pass the muster. There are very few boards who would be ok with this kind of scheme. It wouldn't be a craze, the poor child would be treated a freak. Not ok, don't play with people's lives like that.edit on 20-1-2013 by antonia because: added a thought
Originally posted by IkNOwSTuff
Scientist seeks surrogate mother for Neanderthal baby
news.ninemsn.com.au
(visit the link for the full news article)
A Harvard scientist is reportedly looking for an "adventurous woman" to give birth to the first Neanderthal baby in 30,000 years.
Originally posted by blamethegreys
My wife could totally drop that sh*t.
Our first was 12lb 9oz, 22" long, 48hr labor.
She's a trooper like that.
How much money could I make off her uterus with this?
Originally posted by blamethegreys
My wife could totally drop that sh*t.
Our first was 12lb 9oz, 22" long, 48hr labor.
She's a trooper like that.
How much money could I make off her uterus with this?
Originally posted by Klassified
On the one hand, I can see the scientific value in having a living neanderthal to study and observe. On the other hand, how heartless and cruel to bring this creature into the modern world to be treated as a freak, and a lab rat. Any woman who goes for this must be out of her mind.