It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by VisitorQ
reply to post by jiggerj
Unless the Universe is the physical expression of God. Which is what this argument is about.
We can't figure out how life first began in the material world. To imagine how an empty universe gained consciousness (if at all possible) is way WAY beyond us.
As I said earlier in this thread:
By orderly I mean that the "frame" following the next makes sense.
To illustrate: The Universe is not updated so that when you see a bird flying suddenly it's ten meter behind where it was and suddenly a mile away or suddenly just a feather and then a bird again...
Originally posted by NeverForget
reply to post by VisitorQ
Even if we grant your 3 premises, it still does solve the problem of evil.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able, and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God.
Originally posted by blahxd67
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
Originally posted by NeverForget
reply to post by VisitorQ
Even if we grant your 3 premises, it still does solve the problem of evil.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able, and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God.
Inclusive of all = God. All that is.
You just want nice stuff but God provides all.
So wanting a peaceful world is just "nice stuff"? If God provides all, then he should provide us with a peaceful world and get rid of the evil people on the Earth. But he hasn't. For a long time.