Has anyone explained these objects near the Sun/In Space? Looking for answers!

Have any scientists/astrophysicists/theoretical physicists given explanations for these photos?
If anyone can lead me in the right direction i'd really appreciate it, these are stunning photos.







Thank you for your help figuring these out, the sun photo in particular really left me wanting to know more...

x Robby Starbuck
twitter @robbystarbuck

reply to post by robbystarbuck


What in the hell did I just look at in picture 2 and 3? I couldn't load pic 1.......Source maybe?

Near the sun? Oh my garsh......Why even open some of these threads I ask myself? I DON'T KNOW!!!

1) Coronal prominence cavity.

2) Internal telescope reflection.

3) Crud on the film.

Originally posted by Phage
1) Coronal prominence cavity.

2) Internal telescope reflection.

3) Crud on the film.

4) Maybe some type of entity that we know nothing about!

5) Perhaps some sort of spaceship

I'm sure Phage just accidentally over-looked those two possibilities

reply to post by Human_Alien

There were only three images posted.

Click here for more information.

reply to post by Phage




And in total between you and I we gave 5 possible answers. Seems fair.

You're not saying you know EXACTLY what they all are----are you?

reply to post by Human_Alien

Yes.
Yes I am.

Actually, the second one is more likely to be crud on the photograph plate rather than an internal telescope reflection.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Human_Alien

 

Yes.
Yes I am.

Actually, the second one is more likely to be crud on the photograph plate rather than an internal telescope reflection.

Hmmmm. "More likely" certainly doesn't contain the veracity and conviction of something that is known.

Originally posted by Human_Alien
You're not saying you know EXACTLY what they all are----are you?

Originally posted by Phage
Yes.
Yes I am.

Ok....so then you say this:

Actually, the second one is more likely to be crud on the photograph plate rather than an internal telescope reflection.

So which one is it EXACTLY, being as you "know"?

Don't get ahead of yourself there Phage or start digging holes.

Originally posted by robbystarbuck
Have any scientists/astrophysicists/theoretical physicists given explanations for these photos?
If anyone can lead me in the right direction i'd really appreciate it, these are stunning photos.







Thank you for your help figuring these out, the sun photo in particular really left me wanting to know more...

x Robby Starbuck
twitter @robbystarbuck

From a ufo believer viewpoint.

1) Large spacecraft entering/exiting the sun.
2) Not fully materialized spacecraft
3) No idea.

Originally posted by Phage
1) Coronal prominence cavity.

2) Internal telescope reflection.

3) Crud on the film.

I take it the earth's flat too!

Space portal to other dimensions is the only thing I think of, when it comes to strange inamallies near the Sun. Yup....I think that's your answer.

reply to post by nerbot

Well, here's the original image. I would say that it is definitely crud (or a scratch) on the plate.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f17dfe703711.png[/atsimg]

RA/DEC: 16 19 35, -88 43 10

The plate was exposed on October 11, 1977 at the UK Schmidt telescope in Australia. It was a 75 minute exposure.
stdatu.stsci.edu...

Originally posted by Just Chris
I take it the earth's flat too!

No.
It's an oblate spheroid.

Originally posted by Phage
1) Coronal prominence cavity.

2) Internal telescope reflection.

3) Crud on the film.

Thank you - now I can research Coronal Prominence. Reg. #2 I suspected the same but it same with a quote from a scientist about them being objects on a clear path but they're unsure what the objects are. Kind of vague/fishy IMO that it comes from a real scientist.

RS

Originally posted by Human_Alien

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Human_Alien

 

Yes.
Yes I am.

Actually, the second one is more likely to be crud on the photograph plate rather than an internal telescope reflection.

Hmmmm. "More likely" certainly doesn't contain the veracity and conviction of something that is known.

I do think it's possible it's something otherworldly. Just not a smoking gun.

Originally posted by Phage
1) Coronal prominence cavity.

2) Internal telescope reflection.

3) Crud on the film.

Reg. #3 there is solid evidence it's a natural phenomenon in space that NASA/ESA don't understand yet... That's where it came from.

reply to post by robbystarbuck

Kind of vague/fishy IMO that it comes from a real scientist.

It didn't come from a real scientist.
www.abovetopsecret.com...