It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SMOKINGGUN2012
reply to post by captaintyinknots
It is totally obvious you fail to understand the writer is not NOT saying the tragedy never happened or was a hoax. It is used to refer to the fact that the hoax is done following what happened by the media.
Originally posted by SMOKINGGUN2012
reply to post by captaintyinknots
I knew I should have kept the word hoax out of the title of the thread but oh well......it is the title of the article ......take it as you will.......but you seem to be the only one going ballistic about the word hoax......the rest of us seem to comprehend the English language and how it is applied here just fine.
Originally posted by Wanderer112358
I mean no disrespect in this asking this question, but why is this melodrama so important to you? This madness has already happened and beautiful innocent children have been lost. That cannot be changed. Living in this drama only keeps you off track and blind to what this huge "slight of hand" that is happening right now. What is happening right now is so much more amazing, stupendous and huge than most people can imagine. If you move beyond this madness and find some inner calmness, you would see that this reality is not what it appears and all of these evil and sick acts are to keep you afraid, lost and confused.
This is a big magic trick. Where did the Ace go? And where did the rabbit come from? Step back a little and look at the larger picture if you can...
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Here, how about this, we will start smaller-can you provide any evidence that the rifle was not used, as your source claims? They dont provide any, so can you?
Originally posted by SMOKINGGUN2012
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Here, how about this, we will start smaller-can you provide any evidence that the rifle was not used, as your source claims? They dont provide any, so can you?
No and so what. I don't agree with the writer on that point without proof nonetheless they have many other valid points. Can you prove the writer is wrong? No you can't.......
Originally posted by Rulkiewicz
Great article. Sums up everything nicely. However, I expected to see something regarding the goof-ball medical examiner and his odd behavior, as well as Gene Rosen's various contradicting stories.
Good find.