It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“Who the hell needs armor-piercing bullets except you guys in battle?” Panetta told the soldiers at the U.S. Army Garrison Vicenza in northern Italy. “For the life of me, I don’t know why the hell people have to have assault weapons.”
Originally posted by danneu89
Leon Panetta asks U.S. military troops why anybody but them needs assault weapons.
“Who the hell needs armor-piercing bullets except you guys in battle?” Panetta told the soldiers at the U.S. Army Garrison Vicenza in northern Italy. “For the life of me, I don’t know why the hell people have to have assault weapons.”
Link
This guy is a loon and doesn't even seem to know much firearms considering he's the Secretary of Defense. Good article too.
Any activity that may be reasonably viewed as directly or indirectly associating the Department of Defense or the Department of Homeland Security (in the case of the Coast Guard) or any component of these Departments with a partisan political activity or is otherwise contrary to the spirit and intention of this Directive shall be avoided.
Originally posted by jefwane
reply to post by Happy1
None, the US Military doesn't use the AR-15. They use M-16s and M-4's the AR-15 only looks like an M-4 or M-16. M-4's and M-16 are select fire weapons. In single shot mode they function the same as an AR-15. M-4's and M-16's have the additional fire mode of either a 3 round burst or full auto depending on model.
An earlier poster gave good evidence the Secretary of Defense is probably immune to any military provisions against political activity. It might not be illegal, but it is unbecoming.
edit on 17-1-2013 by jefwane because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
That's funny. If it was the other way around you guys would be saying how great he is and how right he is, but because he doesn't agree with you it is unbecoming.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
While the question is innocent enough, it borders on fringing upon the Hatch Act and Department of Defense Directive 1344.10. Any answer given to the Secretary could be seen as advocating political activity while representing a branch of the armed forces. Of course, the Hatch Act does exclude the Secretary of Defense in engaging in the politically charged rhetorical question he posed, but it does not protect the soldier that falls under Department of Defense Directive 1344.10 and decides to speak up and out against it.
Any activity that may be reasonably viewed as directly or indirectly associating the Department of Defense or the Department of Homeland Security (in the case of the Coast Guard) or any component of these Departments with a partisan political activity or is otherwise contrary to the spirit and intention of this Directive shall be avoided.
It isn't that hard to find a military court to nail a soldier who speaks out against the SecDef in regards to this under Article 92.
This guy is a loon
Dumbass...
for the SoD to even pose such a question should warrant a psyche evaluation ... early onset dementia maybe ?
How many AR 15's are protecting this idiot
Put the broad paint brush away.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
That's funny. If it was the other way around you guys would be saying how great he is and how right he is, but because he doesn't agree with you it is unbecoming.
Originally posted by Ireminisce
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
That's funny. If it was the other way around you guys would be saying how great he is and how right he is, but because he doesn't agree with you it is unbecoming.
Yes, you're right. If he were speaking in defense of our constitution instead of against it we probably would say how great he is.
Originally posted by Happy1
Maybe he just doesn't realize that military people can't voice a political opinion about their "leader"?
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Except neither of you decide what is constitutional. The Supreme Court does.