It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Cops can be twits at times. Same goes for judges
Cops can be twits at times. Same goes for judges
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by flyswatter
Cops can be twits at times. Same goes for judges. They are no different than any other human being in that respect. But I'm not going to pass judgement on someone just because they are a cop or a judge. Each case should be judged on its own merits. What I am looking for (case, name, etc) would allow me to see your proof of the argument working. If you're not able to provide it, why should anyone simply take your word for it?
If the cops and judges don't know the law, how would we know that this is all fake, if they just do what they want anyways? Yes, you very much missed it....The cops and judges do whatever they want; why would you think that they would easily let something like this fly? I have no reason to lie; why would I try to get people in trouble? All you can do is ask me to prove something, that isn't even going to be online?
I can't even find MY cases online; what makes you think every single court case in the world is uploaded to google?
Another analogy for ya; if I said that I dreamt last night about anything doesn't even matter, how could I prove that to you? Instead of asking for proof, how about just debunking it, hmm?
We don't argue in court. We agree with the prosecution. Most of the time it is all settled before it makes it to court. Doesn't even make it onto the docket. There is nothing to adjudicate when there is agreement between the parties. If, somehow, it does make it into court, since there is agreement between the parties, the "judge" is no longer in a judicial position. He is now in a ministerial position. He is a "Public Trustee" who MUST conduct himself according to Public Policy. And, no matter what they say, they are under the UCC. They must discharge the debt according to Public Policy. You can't pay debt with debt(FRN's).
But if a judge says "$500 fine" and bangs his gavel, you give him some argument about being a sovereign citizen and not liable for it, etc etc, and he cocks his head to the side, laughs at you, and walks out
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
Did you miss where he said he spoke to the IRS and they agreed?
Unless the defendant can establish that he is not a citizen of the United States, the IRS possesses authority to attempt to determine his federal tax liability." The case is U.S. v. Slater 545 Fed Supp. 179, (D. Delaware) (1982)
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.
No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
Do you have any proof he is lying? No? Well shut up, then mkay?
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
Mentioned 11 times in the first article of the Constitution...As Citizen....There is no doubt there is a difference, because the law is very precise, especially in matters of grammar and spelling...
This is why Obama doesn't have a Birth Certificate;
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
You can not be a 'citizen of the United States' and be President, or did you fail to notice that?[
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
I can't even find my own court cases; what the hell are you going on about? I mean; the cases must be real if they are on the internet, right?
remember, you do not even have to have a birth certificate to be the President.
They do not have to be on the internet - just show 1 case where the nonsense has worked - but you are unable to even do that. That tells you something about the nonsense.
Just saying hello, I am from New Zealand and interested in why people make up conspiracy theories and ignoring the facts. I also love the way American politics works.