Originally posted by LeBombDiggity
British aid worker/hostage Linda Norgrove was killed in Afghanistan during a botched rescue attempt by a grenade thrown by a US serviceman from the
United States Naval Special Warfare Development Group
While I am sure you think this observation makes you seem sly and witty. I don't get your point – I fail to see any parallel. The two missions are
not even remotely similar in their outcome.
In the situation you reference the hostage was at the location. In the French raid the hostage was elsewhere not even there which indicates that US
intelligence at least had the location of the hostage correct.
In the situation you reference
none of the operators were killed. All of the captors were killed the hostage rescued while still alive (she
died in route to a hospital) and the location secured and searched for intelligence information which lead to additional successful raids. While the
death of the hostage was tragic it was a known possible outcome. the French mission the hostage was not even at the location… Several of the
operators died, they killed 3 innocent bystanders. The raid was a complete failure even had the hostage been there they failed to secure the
location. Oh and they had
another operator taken hostage...
The two are not even remotely close and while the US can claim numerous successful hostage rescues with zero collateral damage, all hostages recovered
completely uninjured and returned and no operators killed or injured – the French I don’t think have ever pulled off such a mission in recent
memory.
In a hostage rescue the risk to the hostage is great. In effect it is the decision point for the execution of the mission. To conclude that the risk
of death or injury of the hostage by the team or the captors during its execution is actually less than taking no action at all. Often the
whereabouts of a hostage are known for long periods of time with the team on call and rehearsing – the mission is not launched until there is
information that indicates that the balance has tipped in favor of action over inaction. I did do this for a living for nearly 24 years.
I am not excusing the actions of the Sailors who conducted the rescue attempt – there is really no reason to ever throw a grenade when there are
hostages about; however, I can say that the hostage should not have run around the compound. She should (as should anyone during a rescue lay face
down with your hands behind your head. She left the room they knew her to be in and ran out into the gully. She panicked the SEALS screwed up and
then lied about it which is why they were disciplined.
Originally posted by LeBombDiggity
... I guess they were the best of the best.
Yes…
Originally posted by LeBombDiggity Mistakes happen despite the best training, the best equipment, the best intelligence ... and the best
men.
Too bad the French evidently have none of these… They failed to locate the right facility (intelligence fail), they killed several bystanders (poor
fire discipline), lost several operators (poor security) and got another one captured (just pathetic apathy)... Doesn’t sound like they were all
that high speed to me. The whole unit would have had to been lost before one of my men would have been captured as we do not leave the wounded behind
for the enemy to take.
Originally posted by LeBombDiggitySometimes you just need luck.
They didn’t seem to have any of that either – they did have hope; however, hope is not a plan.
edit on 13/1/2013 by Golf66 because: (no reason given)
edit on 13/1/2013 by Golf66 because: (no reason given)