It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
@ It is for those of [color=cyan] us who know they exist, and want to pin down exactly who they are.
OP can you list the ones [color=cyan] you know then we can pick which ones of course other then those ALREADY listed from above poster(s) that you felt were not enough..
Originally posted by Grimpachi
I would assert that instead of following the money you should follow the power and the position couldn’t be held by a politician because they are only temporary then you need to find the motives.
Originally posted by Grimpachi
When thinking about the model of someone who could be an elitist I think there would be a very high possibility that one could be a drug czar probably one that has many legal enterprises as well where he could play both sides of the fence. Just a thought.
First of all, I'd like to express my admiration for the irony of the fact that my one word post was actually much closer to the topic than your reply to me.
Originally posted by kiwasabi
Originally posted by BrokenCircles
Originally posted by kiwasabi
....exactly who comprises the elites who currently run the US, UK, etc.
Nonexistent.
"Stay on topic and do not try and derail", that was in my original post. This thread is not for debating whether or not they exist. It is for those of us who know they exist, and want to pin down exactly who they are. If you want to debate whether or not they exist, start your own thread. Do not try and derail mine. Thank you and have a great day.
Originally posted by kiwasabi
....exactly who comprises the elites who currently run the US, UK, etc.
Originally posted by BrokenCircles
Now to slightly reiterate....
Originally posted by kiwasabi
....exactly who comprises the elites who currently run the US, UK, etc.
Even if there truly was some sort of a powerful hidden group of elites whose main goal is to obtain World Domination, then why the hell would they be divided up into different groups that have been designated control over specific countries? Wouldn't that kinda defeat the purpose?
Originally posted by Unity_99
Some good posts already. Bankers, Bildenberg, Rothschild, David Rockefeller. The House of Windsor, some of the head mafia.
But the servants are in every area, every town. They laid the designs for most cities. Its invasive.
M Kultra is everywhere as well. Along with their UN Gang for drugs, and child slave trade, and satanic ritual networks.
It would be hard to name names. But you can analyze, your area, and hold all in city hall, in elite positions suspect, and look for some of the symbols. For example, rings, vehicles, liscence plates.
They're still a hefty minority when people wake up enough to start doing real investigations.
Originally posted by kiwasabi
reply to post by CIAGypsy
Real evidence is what I want to see as well. Apparently those involved in the 1930's planned coup d'état of the US Government had their names stricken from the record. That is how powerful these people are.
"The McCormack-Dickstein Committee "delet[ed] extensive excerpts relating to Wall Street financiers including Guaranty Trust director Grayson Murphy, J.P. Morgan, the Du Pont interests, Remington Arms, and others allegedly involved in the plot attempt. Even today, in 1975, a full transcript of the hearings cannot be traced."
en.wikisource.org...-Dickstein_Committee
Who do you think is really the power behind the banks, government, media, etc?
What would be the objective of this super organization? According to the previously cited New York Times,3 General Butler is reported to have testified that the affair was an attempted coup d'etat to overthrow President Roosevelt and replace him with a fascist dictator. This interpretation is repeated by Archer, Seldes, and other writers. However, this was not the accusation made by General Butler to the committee.
In other words, the Wall Street plot was not to dispose of President Roosevelt at all, but to kick him upstairs and install an Assistant President with absolute powers. Just why it was necessary to go to the trouble of installing an Assistant President is unclear because the Vice President was in office. In any event, it was planned to run the United States with a Secretary of General Affairs, and the gullible American public would accept this under the guise of necessary protection from a communist take-over.
At this point it is interesting to recall the role of many of these same financiers and financial firms in the Bolshevik Revolution—a role, incidentally, that could not have been known to General Butler5—and the use of similar Red scare tactics in the 1922 United Americans organization. Grayson M-P. Murphy was, in the early 1930s, a director of several companies controlled by the J.P. Morgan interests, including the Guaranty Trust Company, prominent in the Bolshevik Revolution, the New York Trust Company, and Bethlehem Steel, and was on the board of Inspiration Copper Company, National Aviation Corporation, Intercontinental Rubber Co., and U.S. & Foreign Securities. John W. Davis, the speech writer for General Butler, was a partner in Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardner & Reed of 15 Broad Street. Both Polk and Wardwell of this prestigious law firm, as well as Grayson Murphy, had roles in the Bolshevik Revolution. Further, Davis was also a co-director with Murphy in the Morgan-controlled Guaranty Trust Co. and a co director with Presidential hopeful Al Smith in the Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., as well as director of the Mutual Life Insurance Co., the U.S. Rubber Co., and American Telephone and Telegraph, the controlling unit of the Bell System.
Originally posted by CIAGypsy
Looks to me like it was all based upon political ideology more so than some "elite" trying to control the world.
Originally posted by kiwasabi
Originally posted by CIAGypsy
Looks to me like it was all based upon political ideology more so than some "elite" trying to control the world.
Well clearly it was financed by the elite. So I don't really see where the distinction lies here. They do believe it's in the world's best interest to allow them to take over, at least according to Carroll Quigley's Tragedy and Hope.
originally posted by: CIAGypsy
Urrr....it is my everlasting AGGRAVATION that individuals on this board continually blast the Rothschild and Rockefeller families based on nothing but rumour and innuendo.
Neither of these families control the world, are involved in drugs or human trafficking and they most CERTAINLY are not involved in Satanic ANYTHING.
check it out - Bloomberg Billionaires Index
NOT A SINGLE DAMN ROTHSCHILD OR ROCKEFELLER ON THE LIST.
If you believe I am wrong and that these good people are involved in all matter of these horrors, please....BY ALL MEANS....post REAL EVIDENCE. Not links to someone else who is spouting nonsense of these rumors. I want to see honest-to-God, would-stand-up-in-court, HARD EVIDENCE.