It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jhn7537
reply to post by minkmouse
The issue is you have 2 groups of people...
Group 1- Look at a picture and automatically believe it's explainable (like a bird, insect, etc).
Group 2- They want to believe so bad that its a ufo their mind tends to see things regardless of the image
It's hard to convince either group regardless, because they both seem to be stuck in their ways...
Originally posted by Rezlooper
reply to post by minkmouse
You have no valid explanation whatsoever. Usually it's CGI, but if that's not clear, well, then it's definitely a bug or a bird every time. Get's old. It can never be an "unidentified flying object" which by the way doesn't mean it's an alien ship, it simply means its unidentified.
My viewpoint and experience suggests we are looking at a bird
Originally posted by minkmouse
Originally posted by Rezlooper
reply to post by minkmouse
You have no valid explanation whatsoever. Usually it's CGI, but if that's not clear, well, then it's definitely a bug or a bird every time. Get's old. It can never be an "unidentified flying object" which by the way doesn't mean it's an alien ship, it simply means its unidentified.
Well as it stands it's a UFO because nobody has brought the hammer down declaring a slam dunk for either side of the argument. My viewpoint and experience suggests we are looking at a bird but as I said, the jury is still out. At the end of the day, based on the evidence presented, we will not determine one way or the other which version is correct but we will believe what we think we see
This hummingbird doesn't appear silver and metallic. So your point is?
Now imagine this, what if both birds and ufo's (if you believe in them) give off the same look with a camera shot??? How would you then be able to tell the difference from one to the other?
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by Bilk22
That's one giant bird LOL OK everything is a bird - until it's not. What's the term you all like to use when ascribing meaning to a blurred image? Hmmm?
I don't know why some people here keep saying if it's a bird, then it must be a giant one.
Tell me: How big is the metal bracket in the picture (the one I marked with an arrow)?:
I'd say that bracket is about 6 inches (15 cm) tall, judging by the wires, chains, and bolts on that pole -- plus the pole itself. So if the "UFO" in question is 5 or 10 meters behind that pole, then the object could easily be bird-sized -- maybe about 1 foot (30 cm) long or so.
edit on 1/8/2013 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by jhn7537
Now imagine this, what if both birds and ufo's (if you believe in them) give off the same look with a camera shot??? How would you then be able to tell the difference from one to the other?
If you saw what I saw one night... you... would... know... the difference. But lets say you have never seen one before (like you?). Then go take all the "bird crossing field of view" pictures you want and see.
The only mystery about this picture is what type of bird it is. Should wait for it to land next time. Bird watching is easier that way. There is no doubt about the kind of tower in the background now is there?
Fuzzy blob on photo: UFO! Do you know what this kind of page after page of "Investigation" has done to the rep of ATS lately? Why I believe it ranks right up there with YouTube.