Obama not so upset about dozens of children killed in drone strikes he personally ordered.

Obama not so upset about dozens of children killed in drone strikes he personally ordered.

www.infowars.com

Despite the fact that drone strikes personally approved by Barack Obama have killed dozens of children around the world, the White House has pulled another crass PR stunt by releasing a photograph of Obama looking upset at the moment he was told the news about the Sandy Hook school massacre.

“The President, who has described the day of the shootings as the ‘worst day of my presidency,’ is seen bowing his head and closing his eyes as John Brennan, his deputy national security adviser, informs...

(visit the link for the full news article)

Our Nobel Price Peace winner finds it perfectly fine to order execution or innocent civilians via drone strikes, but when it comes to disarming Americans he will do everything from shaking his pointing finger to sweeping fake tears to photoshopping “situation rooms”. “Americans must be disarmed” is the goal of that traitor.

www.infowars.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

I'll just leave this here:

Frank Marshall Davis

reply to post by MrHonest





I love this picture. If it was real, who the hell would have the audacity to take the picture during such a solemn conversation? It's obviously staged.

Nor should he be to an extent. I don't think the President is informed on what goes into every military operation other than signing off I want "Mr. X" killed. Im pretty sure they don't say Mr. President there are kids present with him. Those are the decisions of the commanding officer not the President.

I mean if you want to split moral hairs I suppose he is ultimately responsible being that without trying to kill "Mr X." Those children would live, but the President isn't the one on the battle field making the calls and pulling the triggers.

Originally posted by MrStyx
Nor should he be to an extent. I don't think the President is informed on what goes into every military operation other than signing off I want "Mr. X" killed. Im pretty sure they don't say Mr. President there are kids present with him. Those are the decisions of the commanding officer not the President.

I mean if you want to split moral hairs I suppose he is ultimately responsible being that without trying to kill "Mr X." Those children would live, but the President isn't the one on the battle field making the calls and pulling the triggers.

That is sort of splitting moral hairs.

After years of launching these drone strikes in Afghanistan and Pakistan everyone is aware that there is ongoing collateral damage to civilians including children. Obama (as well as Bush before him) has to know that.

reply to post by MrStyx

I have to agree with you on this. As much as I love to play 'pin the tail on the President' (and it is good sport...he just makes it so easy sometimes..lol) I can't for an instant believe he knows or is EVER told the details of individual military strikes over the course of an ongoing shooting war. I am sure someone "on-high" is approving these on a per mission basis when it's over Pakistan or other nations...but the President? The same President telling his staff to auto-pen MAJOR legislation is getting into the details of drone strikes? Indeed.. You're right.

According to numbers I pulled in another thread last night, there have been 283 drone strikes in Pakistan alone since Obama took office. Of those, 2,074 people have been killed by best estimated count. I'm willing to bet he wasn't even aware of all but the MOST critical or politically sensitive.

I blame Obama for drones in the general way he IS to blame. He sets the tone for tactics and methods which are acceptable for his Generals and commanders on down to use. They order the individual hits and authorize per-mission firing though. Slap Obama's hand hard enough to feel for a year or two...but it's the guys who ARE approving the strikes with full detail known that are culpable, IMO.

reply to post by MrStyx

Nor should he be to an extent. I don't think the President is informed on what goes into every military operation other than signing off I want "Mr. X" killed. Im pretty sure they don't say Mr. President there are kids present with him. Those are the decisions of the commanding officer not the President.

I mean if you want to split moral hairs I suppose he is ultimately responsible being that without trying to kill "Mr X." Those children would live, but the President isn't the one on the battle field making the calls and pulling the triggers

So your giving him a free pass, even though he is hypocritical enough to use the same type of incident to facilitate helping him to achieve one of his agendas??

Hmmmm, interesting.......

If you can find information from another website besides infowars then ill believe it, otherwise its just a hoax from that crackpot alex jones.

Which is worse, a lone, mentally ill psychopath with an assault rifle, or a narcissistic president with a fleet of high tech heavily armed drones?

reply to post by MrHonest


The man has no soul, nor did his predecessor, who started these criminal Drone attacks.

This is just Infowars making a claim that can't be substantiated. But since it's targeted at people who hate Obama, they will still believe it despite no evidence.

reply to post by neobludragon


Do you doubt that the picture of a solemn looking Obama is real, or do you doubt the heavily sourced stats on the drone attacks?

Originally posted by crawdad1914
reply to post by neobludragon

 

Do you doubt that the picture of a solemn looking Obama is real, or do you doubt the heavily sourced stats on the drone attacks?

Both of those are irrelevant to the fact that Infowars has been caught making up stories like this dozens of times.
Infowars works by taking stories that are true, and adding something that can never be proven or disproven. I fell for it for about a month, then I realized what he does. I'm not saying Obama is a good guy. Just don't believe anything infowars says. This case is a more obvious example of how they manipulate stories.

Originally posted by crawdad1914
reply to post by neobludragon

 

Do you doubt that the picture of a solemn looking Obama is real, or do you doubt the heavily sourced stats on the drone attacks?

well for one, photoshop can easily make that picture look real and I wouldn't put it past AJ. He is as the previous poster stated constantly making up fake stories.

reply to post by neobludragon

well for one, photoshop can easily make that picture look real and I wouldn't put it past AJ. He is as the previous poster stated constantly making up fake stories.

So do you rely totally on the MSM for your truths? Do you not think they have lied to us for years? Are the MSM not guilty of sensationalizing for the better story? The problem with people in this day and age is the fact that they totally rely on others for their daily dose of information, rather than digesting all of it and using their damned brains to figure out fact from fiction!

To say Alex Jones has never told a truth is a total lie and fabrication and leads me to believe that if the MSM said the same thing, it would be the gospel in your mind...................

Doesn't work that way! They all lie, and they all have an agenda! Pick your poison and use your brain to find the truth in the middle! I know for a fact, that Alex Jones has reported on things before any mention on any MSM station. Drudge Report has done a fantastic job holding the MSM feet to the fire on many things that have been reported on by Alex Jones and only after Drudge has brought it forward has the MSM reported on it!!

reply to post by seeker1963


Agreed about Alex Jones. He's been suckered a few times on bunk stories ..but then, I could mention a certain recent story about evacuation orders to Isfahan City, Iran for how even the biggest outlets in the world can be spoofed and report bad info. ....or another story last year about U.S. fighter jets striking an Iranian Oil Refinery which actually DID happen .... several years earlier than presented. Jones carried some of that and so did MSM outlets. so, I think that puts him in the 'no worse than anyone else' category at the worst.

I think A.J. does solid reporting on topics very few others will even touch. He's bombastic and so full of hyperbole in HOW he covers things sometimes, I think he'll pop like a balloon someday for all to see....but...that doesn't mean he fabricates.

Originally posted by neobludragon
If you can find information from another website besides infowars then ill believe it, otherwise its just a hoax from that crackpot alex jones.

That article contains 10 (!) links to other sources. Apparently not enough for you.

Originally posted by Ghost375
Both of those are irrelevant to the fact that Infowars has been caught making up stories like this dozens of times.

Oh…, I see again those that must be students of CIA, FBI, MI5 and other government schools as usual posting on ATS to practice psy-ops? Didn’t miss my post lol… Of course, poor kids need to pass their exams, earn scores etc. Doing your homework, kids ? Graduating soon huh? They are the future of our safety! . They watch for new topics and attack most ones to practice “debunking” and different “psy-ops” tactics. Getting easier and easier to spot these students here… Business as usual…

Anyways, I think we should make a new White House petition: “Obama to wipe same (fake) tears for kids he ordered to be killed with drone strikes as the ones he wiped for Newtown school shooting”. After all, foreign kids murdered by order of our president deserve tears just like Newtown kids, don’t they? Or maybe not, because they have nothing to do with gun control??? At least let’s make it equal for everyone: Fake Obama-tears for every kid murdered! Fair? I’ve just simplified the topic for some NOT so smart “thinkers” on ATS.

Ok, some of you don’t see how the Nobel Price winner will do everything to disarm Americans, even by dropping a fake tear when needed while at the same time cold-bloodedly executing people like roaches all around the planet... Nobody sees Hypocrisy here?

reply to post by MrHonest

Oh…, I see again those that must be students of CIA, FBI, MI5 and other government schools as usual posting on ATS to practice psy-ops? Didn’t miss my post lol… Of course, poor kids need to pass their exams, earn scores etc. Doing your homework, kids ? Graduating soon huh? They are the future of our safety! . They watch for new topics and attack most ones to practice “debunking” and different “psy-ops” tactics. Getting easier and easier to spot these students here… Business as usual…

I'm not sure if I'm included in that bunch or not? If so..I better call my attorney to get some action going for back pay out of whatever three letter agency I'm supposed to be shilling for. I'm sure getting screwed on this deal, doing it for free.

To put it another way tho.... NO United States President has ever, that I can locate, been convicted of a serious crime during or following their term in office. None. If anyone thinks Barack Obama will be the first in history, they're having a break with reality. It'll never happen. Reagan was probably the closest many of us saw with Nixon probably running a close 2nd. Reagan's would have been more serious. However, men around a president will fall to save him. Whatever it takes.... So chasing the President is how you insure NO ONE ever gets held to account.

If we aim a bit lower at the men who would have at least known operations and missions by name and date...something may actually happen some day. Probably not. There IS a chance though. There is 100% NO chance with the President is the one being sought for prosecution though....it just kills the whole concept right there and before it even arrived to be seen.