It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Submarines
Stupid question......
If Gamma Rays only travel at the speed of light, how could that be used for instantaneous communications?
Originally posted by andy06shake
reply to post by seriousskeptic
Stargate Universe perchance?
In quantum information theory, a no-communication theorem is a result which gives conditions under which instantaneous transfer of information between two observers is impossible. These results can be applied to understand the so-called paradoxes in quantum mechanics such as the EPR paradox or violations of local realism obtained in tests of Bell's theorem. In these experiments, the no-communication theorem shows that failure of local realism does not lead to what could be referred to as "spooky communication at a distance" (in analogy with Einstein's labeling of quantum entanglement as "spooky action at a distance").
Source
Originally posted by seriousskeptic
reply to post by andy06shake
I seem to recall, from among Tesla's notes, something about the generation of gravity waves by the sudden expansion and collapse of energy fields within a large capacitor. I am not certain how this would be done, but if possible it should only be a few short steps to finding a means of obtaining some set resonant frequencies.
These, I think, would be the key to unocking several doors which are now so closed to us, we are not yet aware of them.
Not a stupid question.
Originally posted by Submarines
Stupid question......
If Gamma Rays only travel at the speed of light, how could that be used for instantaneous communications?
The word impossible should be used with the utmost caution, but submarines didn't use the word, you did.
Originally posted by andy06shake
reply to post by Submarines
What makes you think the speed of light is an absolute universal constant? Dont Einstein-Rosen Bridges somehow allow the speed at which light flows to be influenced? What im getting at is that under certain conditions everything is more or less a probability rather than an impossibility.
Originally posted by john_bmth
In these experiments, the no-communication theorem shows that failure of local realism does not lead to what could be referred to as "spooky communication at a distance" (in analogy with Einstein's labeling of quantum entanglement as "spooky action at a distance").
If you're implying that quantum entanglement wasn't known 15 years ago, you should re-check that assumption. If that's not what you're implying, I don't understand your comment "this was at least 15 years ago."
Originally posted by Steffenfield
reply to post by Dispo
I don't believe that quantum entanglement was his proposal at the time. Remember, this was at least 15 years ago.
From what you have described, this may be a case where it's what it looked like. Quantum entanglement's spooky action at a distance has been demonstrated as faster than light. There are a few other exceptions to the speed of light rule but none of them seem to apply to what you describe.
All of these numbers and formulas were packed in together so tightly, it almost looked like the work of someone who went insane.
In other words, things other than matter, energy, or information may exceed the speed of light in the situations described following that quote, but no FTL communication has been demonstrated, 15 years ago, or since.
There are situations in which it may seem that matter, energy, or information travels at speeds greater than c, but they do not.
Originally posted by dorkfish87
Well you could always send information through light.
Encode information directly onto photons
physicsworld.com...
Originally posted by Dispo
I'm not entirely sure it's what you're thinking of, but quantum entanglement is the most promising concept for FTL communication at present.
Basically, in any two particles which have interacted physically and been separated in such a way that they're still connected, changing a property of one will have the opposite effect on the other.
So say I had an electron on earth which was paired with an electron on Zeeblebrox-40, and my electron had a clockwise spin and yours had an anti-clockwise spin, if I changed my spin, yours would change too!
It would be possible to transmit binary messages in this way using a large number of entangled pairs, instantaneously, over any distance.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by dorkfish87
Well you could always send information through light.
Encode information directly onto photons
physicsworld.com...