It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What Was MI6 Team Doing In Paris The Night Princess Diana Died?

page: 2
29
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 06:40 PM
link   
reply to post by misscurious
 


Criss Lopez you honour me with your coquettish emoticon.



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 06:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by DoorKnobEddie
 


please explain why :


three senior MI6 officers in Paris


would be required to excecute < pun > diana`s murder ?



Do you expect them to send the office boy?



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 06:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
Unlike your un-cited number of people killed on the road,

en.wikipedia.org...



Princess Diana had a professional driver, body guards and was in a top range Mercedes (they are built exceptionally well).


No matter how well a car is built when driven at speed by a drunk driver, and not wearing seatbelts people die.


She is the mother of the future king of Britain


Sure about that? Chuck is next in line...


and she received royal protection.


Care to show us what royal protection she received? Any way, "royal protection" does not stop you dying in car accidents.


No way would her driver drink even if he was Dodi's chauffeur.


yes he did actually! The story floating around the intelligence community is Dodi's dad was arranging to have them killed as Dodi was going to convert to christianity!



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 06:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
She was engaged to a Muslim and pregnant with his child.


She was not engaged, nor was she pregnant.... apart from that your post is accurate!



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 06:52 PM
link   
reply to post by DoorKnobEddie
 


please answer the question - why are 3 of the " top " MI6 officials needed in paris to oversee this alledged assasination ????????????

the only person who needs to be in paris is the alledged assasin



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 06:56 PM
link   
reply to post by hellobruce
 


I see you are a regular ol'conspiracy theorist.

Time to get down from your high horse.

BTW, I think there are more than 1.2 million vehicular fatalities every year because countries like India have enormous unreported levels of car accidents. Then there is the African continent where minibuses stuffed with passengers flip over all the time and there is no insurance infrastructure or police to monitor and report stats.



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 07:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by DoorKnobEddie
 


please answer the question - why are 3 of the " top " MI6 officials needed in paris to oversee this alledged assasination ????????????

the only person who needs to be in paris is the alledged assasin


So precisely what do you want to know? MI6 command structures, operational tactics, logistics details or are you trying to initiate an ad hominem attack?

I am not an assassin so I wouldn't know what it would take to flip over a car. You, however, are fairly confident that it would take one assassin.

How would this lone assassin operate and cover up the crime of Diana's assassination????????????



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 07:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
I am not an assassin so I wouldn't know what it would take to flip over a car.


Simply a drunk driver speeding.... it happens every day!



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 07:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by hellobruce

Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
I am not an assassin so I wouldn't know what it would take to flip over a car.


Simply a drunk driver speeding.... it happens every day!


Sorry I don't buy your claims. Princess Diana said that she was in danger, that dark forces were after her and predicted her demise.



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 07:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
Diana said that she was in danger, that dark forces were after her.


That was Dodi's father....



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 07:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by hellobruce

Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
Diana said that she was in danger, that dark forces were after her.


That was Dodi's father....


Your memory is a bit faulty;




Diana 'feared being bugged by dark forces'

An electronic surveillance expert found what may have been a listening bug in the apartments of Diana, Princess of Wales at Kensington Palace, the inquest into her death heard.

He said the Princess had talked of "dark forces" when she discussed her belief that she was being monitore


www.telegraph.co.uk...



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 07:26 PM
link   
reply to post by DoorKnobEddie
 


They werent dark forces.



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 07:42 PM
link   
MI6 were never after Diana, they were after Dodi, and she got caught in the cross fire.

The Al-Fayads were notorious arms dealers, Diana had been warned several times to stay away from this family.

MI6 wanted to send a message to the Al-Fayads by killing off one of the brood, and Diana was an unfortunate victim of an operation gone very, very badly wrong.



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 07:54 PM
link   
reply to post by DoorKnobEddie
 
Every room in that place is buged.



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 07:58 PM
link   
Apparently, not nearly enough.

I'll take the advocatus diaboli position here in defense of the British intelligence community.

How do you know they weren't there investigating late-breaking intel that she might be in danger, but weren't able to ascertain enough info in time to prevent it?

So there, nyeh.



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 07:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by babybunnies
MI6 were never after Diana, they were after Dodi, and she got caught in the cross fire.

The Al-Fayads were notorious arms dealers, Diana had been warned several times to stay away from this family.

MI6 wanted to send a message to the Al-Fayads by killing off one of the brood, and Diana was an unfortunate victim of an operation gone very, very badly wrong.



MI6 didnt do anything.



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 08:07 PM
link   
Strictly from this American's perspective; the fact (or not) that they were in Paris doesn't automatically imply their involvement. It's a big world, and Paris is a big place... if the rest is speculation based on this alleged connection... add it to a list of 'circumstantial' allegations. For now.



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 08:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
My laptop has crashed for the first time since I bought it and my phone is ringing without anyone on the other end. We are truly living in evil times if it is not a coincidence.


after you ..

posted this ?? or when exactly .. ??



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 08:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Vidpci

Originally posted by Avgudar
Why was she killed?


Because the British royal family consists of inbred maniacs that walk around Dracula's castle thinking they're a vampire and others that wish to return as a virus... not to even mention the queen's own sisters that were locked up in a tower because they were so insane from the decades of inbreeding.

I wonder, why was she killed? Who knows what's going on in the minds of these mentally disabled retards.


Sorry m8 but run that by me again !!

Don't get me wrong I am NO monarchists,what so ever but I think you've lost the plot here a bit.What virus would that be, haemophilia or Porphyria ??.Not actualuy sure which sisters those are that you're on about being locked up in a tower.The Tower of London,I'm assuming !!

Which of Dracula - is that the fiction character or a reference to Prince Vlad and which castle would that be ??

Did you mean vampire,in particular or just your common or garden parasite ??

Why was she killed ?? Well,you seem incredibly knowledgeable so far so I'm sure you'll be able to explain !!!

*********************************************************************************************************************************

Personally,I never liked the woman or Charlie for that matter but I remember the night of the crash incredibly well.Me and a mate were up on an all nighter when the breaking news come through that said she'd been in a crash,had some chest and other minor injuries because I remember saying to my mate,

'Oh well,she's lucky then to get away with no serious injuries,isn't so bad she could have died'.

I mean I didn't like the woman,she always came across as a media manipulator to me.Innocent and niave when she wanted sympathy,Princess of Peace when she wanted support etc,etc but I didn't wish her dead that's for sure yet within 2 hours the news broke she was dead !!!

It's funny but my gf is convinced she was murdered while I've always been nah I can't see it thinking that if it was ever proven they were behind it they're finished which wouldn't be worth the risk but you know I think after 8 years she's beginning to wear me down.lol

Admittedly the very idea of the mother of the future King of England marrying a muslim must have made a lot of that blue blood run cold,were they behind it ??

I must admit it's a possibility but even if people are put under suspicion,investigated or even charged it'll never go back to Royalty whether or not they were behind it.

Even if she was murdered do you think the word would have come from Charles or Phillip.Of course not it would be a case of 'being understood' as somebody taking it on their own innitiative to carry out what was 'wished' for.

Does anyone remember King Henry II and Thomas Becket.The famous words 'Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?' Overheard by a couple of his nobles who took it upon themselves to 'carry out the King's wishes' without any order or consultation with the King (or at least that's the colourful story we're taught in school.Did it really happen that way,,mmmmm well we'll never know for sure but....)

I think it is a fitting comparison for how Diana's murder may have come about,if she was murdered which as I said I'm skeptical about but will admit I may be wrong.

As for the Russians suddenly coming out with this now.Their media seems to have a lot to say about the west these days whether it's the US or the UK.From what I read in the article there was little new evidence.

Even if there was 3 senior MI6 officials in Paris at the time it's not much more than an interesting point rather than proof of complicity.Would the officials be in Paris at the time if they were planning to murder her,surely they'd leave the dirty work to the guys in the field and remain far away from getting their hands dirty.It doesn't make sense although another bit of Russian stirring does !!!

Personally speaking I've always found the involvement and ations of the white Fiat Uno during that night as the most curious aspect of it all



posted on Jan, 1 2013 @ 08:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by hellobruce

Originally posted by DoorKnobEddie
She was engaged to a Muslim and pregnant with his child.


She was not engaged, nor was she pregnant.... apart from that your post is accurate!


ok ..

but was she mummified ?? if so, how would we even know she was pregnant if she was...or wasn't for that matter .. i.e. the link in the OP ..



new topics

top topics



 
29
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join