It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by smithjustinb
Nothing is standing out (existing).
The appearance of nothing is seen by nothing.
"In the beginning, there was nothing. Then God said, "Let there be light". And there was still nothing but you could see it."
-- Groucho Marx
DUDE!!!
This is all I'm saying!
You're making an argument when there is none. It just so happens that this happens to be how the universe came about to... Making am argument when there isn't one.
Originally posted by theMediator
Well your nothingness is my everything.
Boring, useless and pointless theory imo...
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
reply to post by jiggerj
But, material things can't be placed into a state of nothingness because each move through the nothingness would require something to fill in the spaces that those material things previously occupied.
This is actually possible if we define mass objects as the absence of nothing.
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by smithjustinb
But, material things can't be placed into a state of nothingness because each move through the nothingness would require something to fill in the spaces that those material things previously occupied.
Material things?? The smallest 'building block' is made of 99.9999% empty space, scientists will tell you this.
Energy is moving.
It is not the objects we're concerned with. It's the supposed state of absolute nothing around it. If this entire state can be considered the absence of nothing, then it isn't 'nothing'.
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
reply to post by jiggerj
It is not the objects we're concerned with. It's the supposed state of absolute nothing around it. If this entire state can be considered the absence of nothing, then it isn't 'nothing'.
Well mabey thats they key to this puzzle. Nothing is an illusion. There is only something and that objects are an also an illusion. Therefore nothing and objects are illusions of perception or perhaps a better way to say it is they are manifestations of perception. This leads us back then to awareness and examining what it is. If we cant define because its our lowest level of reality and we cant go beneath it to examine it then basically we are in a difficult spot as this thread shows.