Sandy Hook Principal ALIVE, NOT DEAD! Gave statement on Shooting, now removed from site.

Originally posted by magickmaster
I have been saying all along, possibly these people DID NOT DIE.

Do you people know no bounds of indecency?

reply to post by magickmaster


Hey I don't post much, but please hear me out...after reading your post I just got curious about who owned the Newtown bee. I did a google search and found the wiki for Newtown CT which mentioned the owner of the paper is the Smith family since 1881!!! So I tried to find more info on this Smith family BUT COULDN'T, other than some info on the current owner Scudder Smith which in fact came from the Bee Newspaper itself. I am a amateur researcher so maybe someone else can find more info. Maybe nothing but I think It's strange to not find info on the family that has owned this paper since 1881. You would think it would be some kind of town legacy, in local history books or something. I can't get over the fact the the newspaper has been owned by the same family since 1881, how and why????

Not sure if someone else has posted this idea already, I skipped ahead a bit when it was going off topic.

If you put yourself in the local papers perspective and you get a phone call, who you would assume would identify themselves as the principle which may be a voice you thought you recognized, but doesn't make sense either, wouldn't you call the cops first?, but lets take that for granted, maybe it was a friend?

Anyways,
you listen, assuming the truth as anyone would in a small town I would think, and write up the story. Then someone 'of importance' comes in and tells you this person was dead and couldn't have called. It wouldn't take much arm twisting to be guilted into pulling the story leaving even the person who wrote it in doubt.

Whether the 'important person' was telling the truth or not. Already you'd be convinced you'd made a mistake for the principles families sake.

One thing i'm not sure of is the rushing at the attacker story. Who witnessed that? I don't recall and am leaning toward how i felt watching 'The Perfect Storm' where.... *Spoiler just in case* nobody could have known what happened since no one was there, kind of like the shooter hearing the sirens and deciding then to shoot himself.

Click here for more information.

I don't think this event was staged but I know the ptb are using this event to take your guns away....

This whole scinario makes me think of that mural in Denver airport, the one of the children disarming the nations.

I have to agree with magicmaster that the only thing holding back the NWO is Americans and their guns, the media has sensationalised the gun control story, and is brain washing people to lean towards a gun ban.
This will proberly not be the last event if it's kind as some people are just not right in the head and dangerous with a gun. But every event of this kind will be another stepping stone toward total gun control.

reply to post by magickmaster


Do you really believe they would hire actors from a website? Do you really believe they would not kill someone who knew of their 'plan'? C'mon. There are some serious issues with the official story, but these aren't them.

reply to post by Scope and a Beam


whose bounds?

Here's the Obituary for Dawn Lafferty Hochsprung

Obituary
Obituaries tab, it doesn't direct link to individual pages

Dawn Lafferty Hochsprung Dawn Lafferty Hochsprung, 47, of Woodbury, died December 14, as the result of the tragic events that unfolded at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown. Beloved daughter, mother, wife, grandmother, and friend, she was a dedicated teacher who inspired her students to reach their fullest potential by instilling in them the importance of life-long learning. A fierce leader and educational activist, Ms Hochsprung was admired by her colleagues, students, and parents, particularly for her caring and nurturing nature. She often referred to her students as her “children” and wanted school to be a positive place and a safe haven. A graduate of Naugatuck High School Class of 1983, Ms Hochsprung discovered the power of knowledge that led her to pursue a career in education. She received her bachelor’s degree in special education from Central Connecticut State University and her master’s degree in education from Southern Connecticut State University. She was currently enrolled at Russell Sage College in Troy, N.Y., pursuing her PhD. — a testament to her own personal mission to continue learning and lead by example. Above all, she was extremely devoted to her family. There was nothing in the world she would not do to ensure that her family was happy and safe. She often credited her mother, Cheryl “Gee Gee” Lafferty for instilling in her the importance of family, and never taking them for granted. Her husband George Hochsprung; her mother Cheryl Lafferty; two daughters, Cristina Lafferty Hassinger and Erica Lafferty; a brother Daniel Lafferty; three grandsons and a granddaughter; three step-daughters, Anne Priest, Amy Lawton, and Beth Ewaskiewicz; and several aunts, uncles, and cousins survive Ms Hochsprung. Her father, William Lafferty, died in 2004.

This sounds familiar, what was it, umm... oh yes:

The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with how Satan works. He will use all sorts of displays of power through signs and wonders that serve the lie, and all the ways that wickedness deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness.

2 Thessalonians 2:9-12

So if everyone who believes these obvious falsehoods of MSM "reporting" should be being deceived by it because it's part of the Plan, is it even right to try to make people stop believing the lies? They believe them because they've damned themselves. Their minds can't even be changed.

Perhaps it's time to find places to expend our energy where it will make a difference...?

reply to post by Sly1one

Originally posted by Sly1one
I will add one thing though...There seems to be a falsehood in the psyche of many that if you don't sensationalize this story and mourn the victims blindly...you are being disrespectful and insensitive. I do not agree with this mental cage of emotional thinking.

There is this presumption that one must not use logical/rational/critical thinking skills and instead must strictly use their emotional thoughts to deal with this situation in order to maintain "decency" and show "respect" for the "dead"....

Well said.

This can be applied to so many other events especially 9/11.

Its the establishment's way of silencing the masses, "youre disrespecting the dead".

Originally posted by DestroyDestroyDestroy
I draw the line at claiming the children didn't die. To make claims like those, when people on ATS have come and out said they personally know parents of the victims, is absolutely disgraceful. Please show some respect for the dead and their families...

edit on 22-12-2012 by DestroyDestroyDestroy because: (no reason given)

So it's a lack of respect for the dead and their families and only that, that would cause people to question the government's involvement/manipulation/destruction of evidence to the extent that they entertain the notion that the whole event might be manufactured? Only that?

You're sure it's not a good grasp of the lying, conniving, greedy, furtive and despotic nature of the U.S. Government?

I'm on the fence with this tragic event.
I could find it possible Adam Lanza was somehow programmed, hypnotized, influenced, drugged, forced, used or even hired to carry out this attack. Then he's killed.

Or it wasnt him at all because the attacker wore some black body armor.

I don't think actors are involved. Innocent children really died.
All the facts haven't yet been revealed. There's bad reporting going on, making the story suspect.

It does appear the incident is going to make it harder to arm yourselves, they don't want to arm what will become the resistance one day. They want an excuse to have armed bodyguards in schools. What's next? At supermarkets or all public transportation. Policing everywhere you go. More of them, less of you, with guns. School kids being made to get accustomed to being 'protected'.

reply to post by ZeussusZ


Anyone claiming stupid things such as "I had a feeling these people weren't really dead".

reply to post by Scope and a Beam


"Do you people know no bounds of indecency"
what bounds? Yours?

Originally posted by magickmaster

Do you or anyone have any pics of dead bodies?
If not, then maybe you could produce some?

I have seen none so far.

You want pictures of dead bodies?

So I guess this means that armchair conspiracists have a right to see pictures of dead bodies to satisfy their own speculations. Did I get that right? Maybe you should call the "alleged" grieving families demanding such photographs. I mean if you haven't, why not? Your search for the "truth" is all that matters after all. You want the pictures go ask for them if it means that much to you. I'm sure they'd love to hear from you.

The lack of humanity by some members of this thread is shocking. "Pictures of dead children or it didn't happen." What right do you have to such pictures? When you take bereavement time for the death of a family member should you be required to show grandma slumped over in her hospital bed, or drooling dad after he's had a fatal stroke? Because who could trust the newspaper obituaries after all - those are riddled with errors. "Sorry, they misspelled your mother's middle name and that photo is clearly not of her. I call conspiracy on your claim your mum died. Pictures or it didn't happen."

If your requirement of proof that people died is to be provided with the pictures, may I suggest some soul searching may be in order.

Has anyone tried the wayback machine, i haven't read this whole thread just first two pages.

It's at :

www.archive.org...

The link we want to check is :

newtownbee.com...

Archive.org telss me that the servers are overloaded right now, i'm in the UK.


QV.

Originally posted by shauny
Just to add to this.

I don't know what to make of this.
Anyone?

Sandy Hook School Shooting A FRAUD!? (PROOF) < Not my title!

This is one of the dad's of a dead child..
Smiling then sad...

Is it just me?

edit on 22/12/2012 by shauny because: (no reason given)

REALLY? NOTHING?
2nd

I checked a mirror of the archive :

web.archive.bibalex.org...*/newtownbee.com...

As you can see, there are no entries from 2008 onward.

Unusual.

Due to web-server parsing you will ahve to copy and paste the above link.

QV.

Why would a news paper that has been in business, with the same family, since 1881, make such a grievous error and print that they had spoken with the principal that day, and even had a story to back this up?

That's what I'd like to to know.

We're talking about a paper that has been in business for many decades.

So they made that story up? They said they actually SPOKE with the principal.

My sensors are going off on this one.

Originally posted by shauny

Originally posted by shauny
Just to add to this.

I don't know what to make of this.
Anyone?

Sandy Hook School Shooting A FRAUD!? (PROOF) < Not my title!

This is one of the dad's of a dead child..
Smiling then sad...

Is it just me?

edit on 22/12/2012 by shauny because: (no reason given)

REALLY? NOTHING?
2nd

Covered in another thread. This guy is clearly "acting", you can see him "getting into character". Very, very wrong..