It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NarrowGate
reply to post by DoYouEvenLift
The language barrier thing again.
It's like people are not using logic or something.
The reason so many accidental shootings happen is a lack of education on gun safety.
Past that, what does stray bullet count as? Is that accidental because it misses the intended target?
I know a couple of people that got shot in schools gun free zones.edit on 21-12-2012 by NarrowGate because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by oper8zhin
Folks this is a NO-BRAINER!!!!!!!!
Nobody is going to shoot up a place if they know that they will become ELIMINATED IMMEDIATELY!!!
Originally posted by NarrowGate
IDK why we are waiting to put armed guards in schools.
I've come to realize that my brain actually is hard-wired different than many peoples. I have been saying put armed guards in schools since before all this happened.
I literally can not understand people when they act like it is a bad idea. It's almost like there is a language barrier even when there is not.
Past that, I see no reason the armed guards should be in uniform; they should look like regular faculty members. No one should know which ones are armed. They should obviously have psych exams and the whole bit.
Give them plenty of trigger time and don't over work them. Of course, all of this would cost money. Yes... about that...
Originally posted by DrNotforhire
reply to post by DoYouEvenLift
We all are... you arent speaking real thoughts... just gibberish in the form of sentences
Originally posted by DoYouEvenLift
Originally posted by SpaDe_
Originally posted by DoYouEvenLift
Originally posted by SpaDe_
Originally posted by DoYouEvenLift
reply to post by oper8zhin
So you are totally okay with having a person in a school whose only function is to kill children?
Weird.
Where the hell do you get armed guard = intends to kill children?
You are aware that in over 95% of school shootings, the people doing the shootings are students from the school, right? An armed security person would be charged with killing one of these students, because if you don't shoot to kill, the person could continue shooting.
So rather than protect the rest of the students by your logic you should just let the killer keep killing? By the way I would like to see the statistics where you can prove 95% of school shootings are done by students.
Statistics are all here if you are so interested.
www.cdc.gov...
You are more likely to be accidentally shot than to be the victim of gun violence. We have virtually zero accidental shootings in United States schools, and have virtually zero guns allowed on school property.
If all indicators prove accurate, more children will die of accidental shootings in schools than from gun violence if armed guards become the norm.
Originally posted by yorkshirelad
"Armed guards at a primary school". If this was a headline for some third world country we would be feeling sorry for the necessity but the USA !!!!! Come on take a step back and look at how utterly sad that is.
The day you NEED armed guards at a primary school is the day to hang your heads in collective shame.
Is the drug of a pistol on your hip that addictive !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by DrNotforhire
My one wish
is that foreigners would stay out of US business... They don't like it when we are in others.... Stop being hypocritical
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by yorkshirelad
Find comfort in that the number of uneducated zealots who buy the NRA propaganda...is shrinking.
Less American homes have guns, than ever. And after recent events, the number should start sinking like a rock.
Originally posted by DrNotforhire
My one wish
is that foreigners would stay out of US business... They don't like it when we are in others.... Stop being hypocritical