It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by QQXXw
Originally posted by gnosticagnostic
reply to post by QQXXw
Are you serious... that's why you think it's a conspiracy is because there was a candlelight vigil? It must be a conspiracy then because I cried almost the whole day over it.. from when I thought it was just 10 little children until the final number.. how dare me have a heart. it must be a conspiracy... your right.. that makes perfect sense.
Real human behavior is far different than what you see on TV. What I saw in the aftermath of the Sandy shooting was actors and cameras and a lot of planned spiel.
Originally posted by bknapple32
Originally posted by QQXXw
Originally posted by bknapple32
Originally posted by QQXXw
Don't dismiss the GE link.
GE's financial services division does a lot of shady stuff.
Do you know who GE are anyway?/?
The whole affair is obviously not what it seems, the fact that those shootings result in a "candlelight" vigil hours after the event makes me think that the grieving parents are nothing but actors.
This shooting, the columbine shooting and the Holmes shooting all have the exact same patterns behind them.
Actors? Jesus. Well whoever did the casting was horrible because they arent 'acting' like the ct'ers think they should. ITs lose lose with you people . IF they cry, then theyre probably crying too much:ACTORS!! If they arent crying, they arent crying enough: ACTORS!!!
Get a grip man. You have just stated that all those shootings are faked. Care to say that to these parent's faces?
Yes I am 100% serious
The parents were grieving on TV are actors, if you think that those people are real people, with real, 100% expired children than you need to re-evaluate your perception of human behavior
Those were actors, much like the Holmes shooting. Their professionalism is not hard to spot.
Then you are not worthy of a human response. But because I dont feel like getting banned over an inhumane , disrespectful frightening member, I'll keep it as civil as I can.
Why not do this. Try and prove it. Hell, why not drive down there and ask his neighbors? What happens when videos surface of that poor little girl and her dad show up? So are the victims fake too?
Not everything is a twist in a movie.
Truly frightening man. Good news is you are just spouting it all from your computer. You have nowhere near the guts it takes to say it to this persons face. Or to even show your own.
Originally posted by gnosticagnostic
reply to post by QQXXw
i'm going to ask a sincere question... I'm stating it this way because I don't want you to think i'm being sarcastic or derogatory ... When was the last time you left your house?
Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by QQXXw
Keep telling yourself that if it helps you sleep better at night. Yep, you're super perceptive because you can accuse a grieving father, who just lost his daughter to an insane gunman, of faking the whole thing and being an actor.
Pathetic.
Originally posted by QQXXw
Originally posted by bknapple32
reply to post by QQXXw
Keep telling yourself that if it helps you sleep better at night. Yep, you're super perceptive because you can accuse a grieving father, who just lost his daughter to an insane gunman, of faking the whole thing and being an actor.
Pathetic.
Yes and you know all. You have the super secret knowledge. Or.... you just cant come to grips with the fact that your life is boring. So you make it as fantastical as possible. Imagining all these movie like conspiracies. Some of which may very well be true. But this is too far. Way too far.
Keep in mind that atrocities have been staged since man could talk and future staged atrocities are being planned as we speak, there is nothing new or surprising in any of this. The Sandy incident was nothing but a staged atrocity, just with a higher level of sophistication that could be afforded by powerful backers.
You are being emotionally manipulated by very calculating and evil people, so I will forgive your outrage.
Originally posted by paulvh
It is the number of "coincidences" that makes this event smell off.
OP, since you're debunking, please explain how a scrawny, nerdy, autistic "patsy" carried three firearms and over a hundred rounds and fired them all in rapid succession, reloading when needed and all of this indoors, where the sound would have been unbearable and disorienting if he wasn't wearing ear protection. By the description of Adam, I would think his arm would be like jello by round no 30. I don't know about assault rifles though as I've only ever fired hunting rifles. I've read that the police couldn't find any record of the Lanzas being at any local shooting range. So another story that seems to be a plant.
The sound of firing those rounds indoors is the big thing for me though. After a few dozen rounds it must be hell.
Originally posted by paulvh
reply to post by bknapple32
Is it common to shoot 100-200 rounds on a shooting range in very few minutes, and without ear protection?
Originally posted by paulvh
reply to post by bknapple32
Yes, it requires somewhat more than average physical strength to carry that much ammo, shoot so many rounds in such a short time, and all this while enduring huge trauma to your eardrums! Look, perhaps it is possible, just extremely unlikely and with all the other strange things like initial reports of other potential shooters on the scene which MSM since "forgot", don't you think at the very least a "second shooter conspiracy theory" should be entertained (by your standards of what should become a conspiracy and what shouldn't) ?
Edit: yes I think some of the most recent ones were "faked" too.edit on 19-12-2012 by paulvh because: replied to another question
Originally posted by bknapple32
Originally posted by paulvh
reply to post by bknapple32
Yes, it requires somewhat more than average physical strength to carry that much ammo, shoot so many rounds in such a short time, and all this while enduring huge trauma to your eardrums! Look, perhaps it is possible, just extremely unlikely and with all the other strange things like initial reports of other potential shooters on the scene which MSM since "forgot", don't you think at the very least a "second shooter conspiracy theory" should be entertained (by your standards of what should become a conspiracy and what shouldn't) ?
Edit: yes I think some of the most recent ones were "faked" too.edit on 19-12-2012 by paulvh because: replied to another question
Might have bee na second shooter. Dont know. So by faked, you mean no victims?