Facebook Now Suspending Accounts Which Question Mainstream Media Reporting/Account of Events

Originally posted by mattdel

Originally posted by seeker1963
reply to post by foodstamp

 

Ok, I'l bite.. Let's list inaccuracies and unconfirmed points and how they've been twisted into a "Conspiracy Agenda"

Your on a Conspiracy Website, but yet you seem to really have an issue with Conspiracy Theorys??? Not quite understanding that one.......

Probably loves conspiracies. Probably can't stand to think that the Government would kill 26 people to further an agenda that we aren't privy to know about. Most people can't handle that train of thought. Part of the reason 9/11 truthers got stifled in their efforts, no one wants to hear earth-shattering, world changing things like that. Gimme my iPhone and my Starbucks and GTFO my way, I got money to make to feed the banks.

The Libor connection alone is HUGE, but unsubstantiated and "taboo" around here, it would seem.

edit on 17-12-2012 by mattdel because: (no reason given)

Ohh please, you know how foolish you sound right now? You just admitted that the government did this!? Really? Show me evidence. Not "absence" of evidence. But evidence! Or stop embarasing yourself! Sheeesh... Lol..

Originally posted by mattdel

Coroner reported exactly 2 shots per body. In the heat of "battle", it takes a well trained, well prepared person to fire exactly 2 rounds into each separate person. That, or someone accustomed to execution-style weapon use.

We'll see sooner or later, I suspect. I have a feeling that the lid on this one is gonna pop off.

OMG! And there were 26 people killed. 26 divided by 2 is 13. An UNLUCKY number!!! OMG!

Then, OMG 13-2 =11 and 1+1 =2 and we're back to the number of bullets in each body!!

1+3=4 and 4+2=6 and it happened on the 14th , 1+4 =5 and only one shooter 5+1 = 6 again!!!

This is the 12th month of the 12th year and 1+2+1+2=6!!

It's 6 6 6, the ANTICHRIST!!!

Now we know why all this has happened!!!


see how crazy that sounds? Oh wait, maybe you don't and you think it's the answer.

Originally posted by RangerClark29
Here is the video with the statement of prosecution for false information on any social media sites.

Much love

RangerClark29

lmFao ... "I'LL HUFF AND I'LL PUFF, AND I'LL BLOW YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH AWAY!!!"



That guy is full of manure. You can't be prosecuted for "misinformation" LOL... if that were true, HE would be in jail along with a couple hundred million of his closest friends.

To see him actually saying this. Out loud. on LIVE TV is absolutely mind boggling


ps. this is what happens to an officers brain after ingesting copious amounts of doughnuts -> you turn into a dough-head

Originally posted by seeker1963
reply to post by foodstamp

 

Well, there unfortunatly is a fine line between actual conspiracy theory backed by evidence and just outright paranoid accusations based on someones belief system. I however, am interested in the first example.

Fair enough! But what do you consider evidence? Something that we hear the talking heads on TV telling us, whom by the way are all owned by 6 huge corporations?

Are critical thinking skills now officially outlawed and we must believe what the TPTB tell us is truth??

Not meaning to bash you, but truth is becoming an animal listed on the "extinction list" if you get my drift.....

I unlike you appreciate those on ATS that keep my mind working versus believing everything I am told.

edit on 17-12-2012 by seeker1963 because: (no reason given)

I really wanna reply to this.... Give me an hour....

Originally posted by L8RT8RZ
Good, that stuff doesn't belong on facebook. Facebook is not a conspiracy website.

Facebook is whatever you want to make of it. Who are you to decide what goes on someones FB page.

Originally posted by mattdel
[

Coroner reported exactly 2 shots per body.

Are you making stuff up to suit your conspiracy theory??

'The worst I've seen': Autopsies that moved veteran medical examiner to tears as report reveals each tiny body had been pumped with between THREE and ELEVEN bullets

-Dail Mail, UK

now the Daily Mail may not be the world's greatest newspaper - but that number - 3 to 11 shots per body - is repeated all over the world right now.

What is your source for exactly 2 shots??

Because the public is so upset about this, I imagine was simple scenario is that people saw this and complained to Facebook.

thats a pretty close one to call,
I can see the justification in not allowing something like to be up and present 'just yet'
Its a national tragedy and I think people need to be considerate in the immediate days.

But, if after a week you still cant post something like that, then yes time to ask questions.

Originally posted by foodstamp

Originally posted by mattdel

Originally posted by seeker1963
reply to post by foodstamp

 

Ok, I'l bite.. Let's list inaccuracies and unconfirmed points and how they've been twisted into a "Conspiracy Agenda"

Your on a Conspiracy Website, but yet you seem to really have an issue with Conspiracy Theorys??? Not quite understanding that one.......

Probably loves conspiracies. Probably can't stand to think that the Government would kill 26 people to further an agenda that we aren't privy to know about. Most people can't handle that train of thought. Part of the reason 9/11 truthers got stifled in their efforts, no one wants to hear earth-shattering, world changing things like that. Gimme my iPhone and my Starbucks and GTFO my way, I got money to make to feed the banks.

The Libor connection alone is HUGE, but unsubstantiated and "taboo" around here, it would seem.

edit on 17-12-2012 by mattdel because: (no reason given)

Ohh please, you know how foolish you sound right now? You just admitted that the government did this!? Really? Show me evidence. Not "absence" of evidence. But evidence! Or stop embarasing yourself! Sheeesh... Lol..

No, I don't sound foolish, because I'm not foolishly admitting anything. I said THINK, not DID. Again, CONTEXT CLUES. Simply pointing out an avenue of thought. You appear foolish for assuming that you know what I'm talking about.

Also, if ANYONE on this site had any "evidence" surrounding any claims they make, to this topic or any other highly sensitive topic, it wouldn't be a conspiracy, now would it? No, it would be fact. How can you walk into a thread that's just about 100% full of speculative comments and berate people because they can't substantiate the claims? That's what this freaking website is FOR. Seriously, go away. Go back to Reddit or something, you don't belong here. This website is a think-tank, not a Congressional Library.

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
did the poster have the rights to use that image?

Did the poster have correct information as it has been reported that Lanza's family took him to a shooting club?

Why can't people just wait until all the facts are in before commenting on an event...

Originally posted by foodstamp

Originally posted by HIWATT
reply to post by foodstamp

 

So what's your point? Are you saying he had his account suspended for posting "false information" on his Facebook?

This thread isn't about whether that info is correct or not... it's about censorship.

My point?? Bud! really? My point is they have EVERY RIGHT to take off anything they deem inappropriate. And not only that, but the "User" agreed to those terms!

Your right it's about censorship! FB is not America, FB is a privately owned corporation/website.

edit on 12/17/1212 by foodstamp because: (no reason given)

Ok then. Calm down. That's all I wanted to know, as it wasn't clear in your post.

However, could you provide evidence (since this seems to be so important to you) that this photo was taken down because it was "inappropriate" ?

Yes, a member agrees to a the Terms of Service when signing up for Facebook.

Here they are BTW: www.facebook.com...

Could you show me the specific term there that would justify the removal of his photo?

Or you could check here: www.facebook.com...

Again. Please cite the specific area which would justify the actions taken against the OP.

... I couldn't find any... unless someone actually filed a copyright on a meme they created in Microsoft Paint and SOMEHOW saw it on OP's Facebook wall... /sarcasm

Originally posted by Juggernog

Originally posted by L8RT8RZ
Good, that stuff doesn't belong on facebook. Facebook is not a conspiracy website.

Facebook is whatever you want to make of it. Who are you to decide what goes on someones FB page.

I'm not the one that suspended his account, facebook is and it's apparently because that stuff doesn't belong on facebook. Simple logic.

reply to post by boncho


You mean like 9/11?

That was over 10 years ago and we're still waiting for "facts to come in"

I went through Facebooks T&C's and saw nothing there that justified the removal of his image. (see my last post)

Some random person seeing that, and becoming offended is not something I saw in Facebooks own rules as being some kind of violation.

"just change the channel" as they say....

Originally posted by boncho

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
did the poster have the rights to use that image?

Did the poster have correct information as it has been reported that Lanza's family took him to a shooting club?

Why can't people just wait until all the facts are in before commenting on an event...

Thank God for another voice of reason. I was beginning to wonder if there were anymore around or not.

Originally posted by mattdel

No, I don't sound foolish, because I'm not foolishly admitting anything. I said THINK, not DID. Again, CONTEXT CLUES. Simply pointing out an avenue of thought. You appear foolish for assuming that you know what I'm talking about.

Also, if ANYONE on this site had any "evidence" surrounding any claims they make, to this topic or any other highly sensitive topic, it wouldn't be a conspiracy, now would it? No, it would be fact. How can you walk into a thread that's just about 100% full of speculative comments and berate people because they can't substantiate the claims? That's what this freaking website is FOR. Seriously, go away. Go back to Reddit or something, you don't belong here. This website is a think-tank, not a Congressional Library.

edit on 17-12-2012 by mattdel because: (no reason given)

Actually, yes, you do. She, however, sounds like she has some sense and is asking good questions that you refuse to answer.
Think tank??? Seriously? That would require thought, not blurting out things that make no sense.

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul

Originally posted by mattdel
[

Coroner reported exactly 2 shots per body.

Are you making stuff up to suit your conspiracy theory??

'The worst I've seen': Autopsies that moved veteran medical examiner to tears as report reveals each tiny body had been pumped with between THREE and ELEVEN bullets

-Dail Mail, UK

now the Daily Mail may not be the world's greatest newspaper - but that number - 3 to 11 shots per body - is repeated all over the world right now.

What is your source for exactly 2 shots??

Excellent find! Thank you for denying the ignorance that was being displayed.

Originally posted by L8RT8RZ

Originally posted by boncho

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
did the poster have the rights to use that image?

Did the poster have correct information as it has been reported that Lanza's family took him to a shooting club?

Why can't people just wait until all the facts are in before commenting on an event...

Thank God for another voice of reason. I was beginning to wonder if there were anymore around or not.

The problem with being reasonable, is that it can prevent you from being critical.

Many see these gun-related "events" as questionable, and I find that to be reasonable when you look at the pressure the American Government is under to dissolve the 2nd amendment.

Originally posted by L8RT8RZ

Originally posted by Juggernog

Originally posted by L8RT8RZ
Good, that stuff doesn't belong on facebook. Facebook is not a conspiracy website.

Facebook is whatever you want to make of it. Who are you to decide what goes on someones FB page.

I'm not the one that suspended his account, facebook is and it's apparently because that stuff doesn't belong on facebook. Simple logic.

"apparently" ?

Has no one bothered to even check on this? There are a number of people in here blindly "siding" with Facebook simply because they see the photo that was posted as tasteless or what have you...

Well I looked that their Terms and didn't see anything that would justify a removal... have a look for yourselves.

www.facebook.com...

www.facebook.com...

Originally posted by HIWATT

Originally posted by foodstamp

Originally posted by HIWATT
reply to post by foodstamp

 

So what's your point? Are you saying he had his account suspended for posting "false information" on his Facebook?

This thread isn't about whether that info is correct or not... it's about censorship.

My point?? Bud! really? My point is they have EVERY RIGHT to take off anything they deem inappropriate. And not only that, but the "User" agreed to those terms!

Your right it's about censorship! FB is not America, FB is a privately owned corporation/website.

edit on 12/17/1212 by foodstamp because: (no reason given)

Ok then. Calm down. That's all I wanted to know, as it wasn't clear in your post.

However, could you provide evidence (since this seems to be so important to you) that this photo was taken down because it was "inappropriate" ?

Yes, a member agrees to a the Terms of Service when signing up for Facebook.

Here they are BTW: www.facebook.com...

Could you show me the specific term there that would justify the removal of his photo?

Or you could check here: www.facebook.com...

Again. Please cite the specific area which would justify the actions taken against the OP.

... I couldn't find any... unless someone actually filed a copyright on a meme they created in Microsoft Paint and SOMEHOW saw it on OP's Facebook wall... /sarcasm

I appreciate where your trying to take this. But I'm not going there with you. FB resumes the right. (even if not in the agreement, which it is) That ANY material THEY deem to be inappropriate can be deleted from FB. Simple as that.. I won't argue under which "statute" that lies because frankley it's irrelevent. Because the assume final judgement and it's their right to edit or censor because it's their property... And that's all that matters. If you were the guy in question then certainly maybe you could argue that it technically isn't offensive and has some "weight" so to speak. But that's between him and FB. That fact remains, They have a right to censor it.

Originally posted by HIWATT

Originally posted by L8RT8RZ

Originally posted by Juggernog

Originally posted by L8RT8RZ
Good, that stuff doesn't belong on facebook. Facebook is not a conspiracy website.

Facebook is whatever you want to make of it. Who are you to decide what goes on someones FB page.

I'm not the one that suspended his account, facebook is and it's apparently because that stuff doesn't belong on facebook. Simple logic.

"apparently" ?

Has no one bothered to even check on this? There are a number of people in here blindly "siding" with Facebook simply because they see the photo that was posted as tasteless or what have you...

Well I looked that their Terms and didn't see anything that would justify a removal... have a look for yourselves.

www.facebook.com...

www.facebook.com...

Here ya go

"We can remove any content or information you post on Facebook if we believe that it violates this Statement or our policies"

"We reserve all rights not expressly granted to you."

There seems to be an actual FB policy guide somewhere too that would get more descriptive. This is just a "User Statement of rights".