My keyboard is broken on the inside somehow and does wierd things from time to time....
incldung fat finger mistakes...it gets a bit frustrating ...link posted now bud....
I wasnt aware such a quantity of NUKE traces were found or analyzed from the WTC
rubble.................................................................................................................below.
Barium and Strontium: Neither of these elements should ever appear in building debris in these quantities. The levels never fall below 400ppm for
Barium and they never drop below 700ppm for Strontium and reach over 3000ppm for both in the dust sample taken at Broadway and John Streets.
Thorium and Uranium: These elements only exist in radioactive form. Thorium is a radioactive element formed from Uranium by decay. It’s very rare
and should not be present in building rubble, ever. So once again we have verifiable evidence that a nuclear fission event has taken place.
Lithium: With the presence of lithium we have compelling evidence that this fission pathway of Uranium to Thorium and Helium, with subsequent decay of
the Helium into Lithium has taken place.
Lanthanum: Lanthanum is the next element in the disintegration pathway of the element Barium.
Yttrium: The next decay element after Strontium, which further confirms the presence of Barium.
Chromium: The presence of Chromium is one more “tell tale” signature of a nuclear detonation.
Tritium: A very rare element and should not be found at concentrations 55 times normal in the basement of WTC-6 no less than 11 days after 9/11, which
is another “tell tale” sign of nukes.
Here we have some very telling evidence that some type of Nuclear Device may have been used to fell the WTC 1 and 2 buildings....
edit on
17-12-2012 by stirling because: (no reason given)
At the link other plausible explanations are discussed and refuted by scientists who presented their reearch resuls.
Several hypothesies are discussed in detail, please do NOT post frivilously...read the material first.....
edit on 17-12-2012 by stirling
because: (no reason given)
edit on 17-12-2012 by stirling because: (no reason given)