Is the Moon a Mothership ?

Originally posted by karen61560
reply to post by Ben81

 

But the fact that a lot of the other planets in just our solarsystem alone have moons I think its just a moon. Are there seven mother ships watching Neptune ? Or Jupiter with over 63 confimed moons boy they are really watching Jupiter.

Well ..

This is Earth:
Radius: 6,371 km

This is Jupiter
Radius: 69,911 km



but seriously i wonder whats on Jupiter
maybe there is an alien colony there we dont know
im more interested with the Moon and Mars
i suspect some aliens base on both .. yes
we dont have much on Jupiter

Originally posted by karen61560
reply to post by FinalCountdown

 

The moon is most likely a piece of earth that was blown off during the early days of our planet. Our moon is a ship but all the other moons out there, they are just moons?

yeah thats what i though before
after an asteroid impact .. but now i dont know about that theory

reply to post by FreedomCommander


The current theory is that the moon is part of earth that was blown off by an astroid in the early days of our planets existance.

reply to post by Ben81


Well I think I will stick with the scientific theory and leave the Once upon a time theory alone if its ok with you.

Originally posted by karen61560
reply to post by FreedomCommander

 

The current theory is that the moon is part of earth that was blown off by an astroid in the early days of our planets existance.

Then how come the moon is much older than earth? Notice I am not 100% certain on it being tugged into orbiting earth, all I am saying is that there are anomalies that fit the spaceship moon theory.

At the very least it IS HOLLOW just like earth and has "alien life" residing within it and on the surface. Richard Hoagland and his team have proved there are ancient artifacts on the moons surface like glass structures, pyramids, and john lear claims there is a nuclear fussion reactor as well as a soul catcher that catches souls from earth.

Far fetched, but only to a public that has been kept in the dark for thousands of years. A soul catcher sounds funny though.

Originally posted by karen61560
reply to post by Ben81

 

Well I think I will stick with the scientific theory and leave the Once upon a time theory alone if its ok with you.

its okay with me
what ever make you sleep well at night
will remember not to give you a bed time story that start with "Once opon a time"
because the last bedtime story to you about the moon being a alien mother ship
didnt work so well

i think the scientific theory that you speak off
is more frightening and insane then anything else
a big impact with something that created the moon a long time ago
would literaly be the end of the world for real if it happen again
after such a big chunk from earth was removed .. im surprise earth still have life on it

reply to post by Ben81


Actually it seems some planets in our own solar system could have been destroyed by pyramids used as scalar weapons between ancient space-faring tribes at war with each other. At the very least there should have been a planet between mars and jupiter where the asteroid belt currently resides. It is called the exploded planet hypothesis!

But of course it has nothing to do with moons. Asteroids are not perfectly round and as big as our moon. Mainstream science is so far out of touch with reality I am literally amazed sometimes at how easily people swallow up the lies. It is disgusting!

reply to post by EarthCitizen07

Then how come the moon is much older than earth?

How come you think it is?

Same reason you think it and the Earth are hollow?

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by EarthCitizen07

 

Then how come the moon is much older than earth?

How come you think it is?

Same reason you think it and the Earth are hollow?

Found the hollow earth map



i have yet to find a hollow moon map .. still searching
or maybe this mother ship map from the op



we will never know until we actualy go there ..
so its hard to get an ultimate proof of that

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by EarthCitizen07

 

Then how come the moon is much older than earth?

How come you think it is?

Same reason you think it and the Earth are hollow?

OMSM) Page 92
"The oldest rocks found on planet Earth have been discovered in Greenland. They are dated 3.7 billion years."
"One rock from mans first trip to Luna was a baffling 4.3 billion years old. Another puzzler (Rock #13) checked in at an unbelievable 4.5 billion years. And an Apollo 11 soil sample turned out to be 4.6 billion years old. Another report based on the Potassium-Argon system of dating, now accepted by science as the most accurate dating system, claimed some of the rocks gave an unacceptable age of 7 billion years. "
"Two Apollo 12 rocks have been dated at 20 billion years."

www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

reply to post by karen61560


Not possible, else We would all be dead.

Imagine sending a high speed bb into a sphere that is at least 10X it's size. The BB will break the larger sphere, and it'll be no more.

reply to post by Ben81


The hollow earth theory makes sense because above north-central siberia there is a no fly zone about 50 miles in diameter that satellites and planes have been lost within. At the south pole the entrance seems covered by ice at lake vladistock in antartica.

And people wonder WHERE THE HELL ARE THE OPENINGS?

answer: over the least populated areas of course!

reply to post by EarthCitizen07

Oh, I see. You have a stupid source. 20 billion years. That's a good one.

www.sciencedaily.com...
www.psrd.hawaii.edu...

reply to post by Ben81


It was a big war. So far as the text goes, Satan/Lucifer was in charge of the deal of total control, and the one we call God, decided that isn't the plan.

May sound a little too religious, but it makes sense. Satan/Lucifer lost, was killed, but didn't stay dead, (Darn him). I need to do more research on what else happened, and what was Maldek like.

Plus the Moon has a denser atmosphere than ours, so any rock entering, will burn up right away. Astrologist can prove that.

reply to post by FreedomCommander

Plus the Moon has a denser atmosphere than ours, so any rock entering, will burn up right away. Astrologist can prove that

not sure about that

im curious to hear what Phage have to say about this lol

reply to post by Ben81

I don't think astrologists know much about the physical aspects of the Moon. They know a lot about the zodiac and telling the future though.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Ben81

 

I don't think astrologists know much about the physical aspects of the Moon. They know a lot about the zodiac and telling the future though.

lollllll you got that right
i knew a could count on you for a correct answer

but im sure he meant something like:
Geologist or Exogeologist
Planetologist or simply said Astronomer

about Astrologist .. i can say a lot with just a birthday
let me know if you wanna try

AstraBenQology

part of The Cube Thread

The secret of our personalities and who we are really comes from the stars
we are all born under certain constellation .. giving us a zodiac sign
a life path number and animal connection (our personal totem)
and its all science

has for seeing the futur .. thats impossible
the only thing you can know with the stars
is when each cycle ends and starts
like on the winter solstice 21 december 2012 it will be the end of the Age of Pisce
after 2000 yrs .. the shortest cycle of all
and the start of the age of Aquarius
it take 26000 yrs to make a complete 360
can you guess how many zodiac signs we have ?

reply to post by FreedomCommander

Plus the Moon has a denser atmosphere than ours, so any rock entering, will burn up right away. Astrologist can prove that.

Holy # ! Where do you come up with stuff like this? Do you even care if what you say or believe is true?

Seriously, provide some kind of source for the Moon's atmosphere being denser than ours. Not an astrologer. Not a tarot card reader. A credible source.

Originally posted by FreedomCommander

Plus the Moon has a denser atmosphere than ours, so any rock entering, will burn up right away. Astrologist can prove that.

edit on 18-12-2012 by FreedomCommander because: (no reason given)

Isn't it interesting that NASA had a very tough time landing spacecraft on the moon? How many times did they try and fail? It is said Werner Von Braun finally got it right, the same scientist brought to america by project paperclip after the nazis lost the war. He was in charge of designing V2 rockets that landed in england. Then he took over NASA when coming to the usa.

Basically they could not figure out the neutral point of gravity between earth and the moon. They thought the moons gravity was 1/6 earth when in reality it is approximately 63%(if I remember correctly). There must be an artificial gravity source on the moon or the moon is super dense and makes up the difference in terms of mass loss to earth.



"At a point 43,495 miles from the Moon, lunar gravity exerted a force equal
to the gravity of the Earth, then some 200,000 miles distant." - Wernher von Braun (Time Magazine, July 25, 1969).

I know it has been suggested before and i've also heard its hollow

reply to post by EarthCitizen07

Wernher von Braun (Time Magazine, July 25, 1969).

Nope. Another lie. Not Von Braun. His name doesn't even appear in the Time magazine article. It's also important to note the full context.

At a point 43,495 miles from the moon, lunar gravity exerted a force equal to the gravity of the earth, then some 200,000 miles distant. Beyond that crest, lunar gravity predominated, and Apollo was on the "downhill" leg of its journey.

www.time.com...
industrialnews.industrialartifactsreview.com...

As is often the case, a mass consumption news source, in oversimplifying a complex point, got the details half right. Apollo 11 was on the downhill leg but not just because of the moon's gravitational influence. It is not a simple two body calculation and it has virtually nothing to do with the "neutral point". There are actually four bodies involved; Earth, the Moon, the spacecraft, and the Sun. Add to the mix the motion of both the spacecraft and the moon and the calculation for the "top of the hill" becomes a very great deal more complex than a simplistic two (static) body calculation.

The Moon's gravity is 1/6th that of Earth. As has been repeatedly demonstrated by various satellites in orbit around it. As is demonstrated by its orbital period around Earth.