It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jeremiah65
reply to post by Aisling
I am asking that same question. Why go to the school in the first place? His mother didn't work there...she was not there. He hadn't attended the school in something like 14 years...a little long to hold a elementary school grudge don't you think? And it was a different principle...this principle was new.
None of this adds up.
Let us not forget, Daddy (first reported dead) worked for General Electric tax division. GE has made billions the last few years and has paid zero taxes. What if mommy knew something...some kind of fraudulent activity...and to extort more alimony from daddy (they were divorced) she threatened to go public with said info. Daddy panics...tells his superiors...they send team to mommy's house. Kill mommy...kill son. Take son's body to school, randomly kill, drop son and weapons found at mommy's house...bolt off into the woods. This would explain the "multiple shooter" reports. The "daddy was killed" reports were probably released early in case "daddy" chose not to go along with corporate orders.
Remember this...GE owns a lot of media and news networks...they are quite capable of having all of this scripted and ready to release before the act ever took place...they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC, etc...etc...etc.
ETA: The best way to hide a hit is to make it look random, a robbery, serial killer, mass shooting...etc. I have a gut feeling this was done for other reasons and painted in such a way that it happens to work toward another agenda. A company the size of GE has huge connections...
edit on 12/16/2012 by Jeremiah65 because: (no reason given)edit on 12/16/2012 by Jeremiah65 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Scope and a Beam
...
In the aftermath of such devastation there is of course going to be conflicting reports. I actually heard them say themselves on the news yesterday, that they were unsure if Nancy Lanza was associated with the school or not.
The absolute desperation for this to be a conspiracy is washing all over ATS and it is exactly things like this that make people not take conspiracy theorists seriously.
Sometimes, some messed up people do very terrible things. It doesn't always have to be MKUltra.
Originally posted by butcherguy
Yes, remember, initial reports had her dead at the school, in her classroom.
Then it changed, she was dead in her home.
Now she never worked there.
Where did that initial story come from? Kind of a BIG jumping to a conclusion by the media, eh? Someone fed them that story.
WHO?edit on 15-12-2012 by butcherguy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Unity_99
If she was a substitute teacher: There would be an established connection to the school, she WOULD BE on record, and at least some of the staff would know her.
So this entire thing is very fishy indeed.
Originally posted by WanDash
Originally posted by Scope and a Beam
...
In the aftermath of such devastation there is of course going to be conflicting reports. I actually heard them say themselves on the news yesterday, that they were unsure if Nancy Lanza was associated with the school or not.
The absolute desperation for this to be a conspiracy is washing all over ATS and it is exactly things like this that make people not take conspiracy theorists seriously.
Sometimes, some messed up people do very terrible things. It doesn't always have to be MKUltra.
I understand your sentiment...but, guess what...(?)...we have choices:
1. Always take what we are fed...even when there are inconsistencies - because we trust that no-one-or-group could/would have motives and/or agenda that would affect us adversely...and slip a dose of psycho-active substances in every spoonful...
2. Question inconsistencies, propose theories...test them...and allow others to assist in finding our potential flaws/biases...until...
a. The inconsistencies are ironed-out
b. The theories are proven right/wrong/possible
c. etc...
Yeah - I get frustrated with some of the postulations, as well... I get frustrated with giant leaps in logic... But - it's all a part of the process.
If you have not been fooled by "the official story" at least once in your life -- you are either so brilliant that even Einstein's genius would have to bow at your step-stool...or...you're not very perceptive.
(I believed in Santa Claus FAARRR too long!)
\
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by IamAbeliever
The Wall Street Journal first mentioned it:
blogs.wsj.com...
It could be that Nancy Lanza was a volunteer or a substitute teacher.
Originally posted by BABYBULL24
I dunno would this kid be capable of double tapping 20 - 6 year old kids with precision as the medical examiner explained. Seems like wet work by professionals to me - maybe Spetsnaz or Blackwater...to push a political end.
Peace
Originally posted by BABYBULL24
Would suspect the mother had some beliefs & guns - so they send 2 or 3 operatives to the house - kill the mother & suspected shooter - stuff the kid in a doufel bag. Jump in the family car - few miles from the school - park the car blocking the entrance to the school.
The 1st guy shoots out the front door makes a b-line for the K Class opens the back door for the guys carrying the alleged shooters body - they kill the kids dump the alleged shooters body. They slip out of the back of the school - they reported multiple shooters - all of them & they run through through the woods to get in the car headed for Moscow or France or wherever. Meanwhile the local cops are setting up their robotic devise & its all been over for a longtime.
& you have changed a country in less than 15 minutes.
Peace
Originally posted by NinjaKitteh
Originally posted by thunder57
So you think she took her own life? If she did this how well trained was she, and who trained her is now the the question?edit on 15-12-2012 by thunder57 because: (no reason given)edit on 15-12-2012 by thunder57 because: (no reason given)
I don't like where that sent my mind
I've seen a lot of "politics" in schools and their hiring. What are the chances that the mother was a teacher and that she had tried to get a position at the school and wasn't hired. She may have been very depressed or have some other issues and did commit suicide. Then the son may see it as the school having caused his mother to do this with his own mental issues and carried out the attack as revenge for what he felt they did to his mother?
Just a theory and nothing more, but that's what went through my mind.
Originally posted by WeRpeons
What's so outrageous about this, is the news media reporting it as credible. What ever happened to responsible journalism? Check your sources, and at least have (3) reliable sources before you report it. How difficult is it to call the local school district and check personnel or the payroll department?
The media is too quick to report things without checking their sources. It's totally irresponsible. I also think video taping the brother of the shooter handcuffed is also irresponsible journalism. They didn't even know if the brother was involved in this incident. So now this unfortunate guy who was related to the shooter has his face plastered all over the media. The media and the police made him look guilty. Why he was handcuffed if he was just going to be questioned is also questionable on the part of the police.
I see the brother of the shooter filing a law suit for defamation of character.
Originally posted by BABYBULL24
"A former school board official in Newtown called into question earlier reports that Nancy Lanza had been connected to Sandy Hook Elementary School, possibly as part of the teaching staff.“No one has heard of her,” said Lillian Bittman, who served on the local school board until 2011. “Teachers don’t know her.”
Nancy Lanzaedit on 15-12-2012 by BABYBULL24 because: (no reason given)