It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bearack
reply to post by Just Chris
I remember the original video as it was on the news but I don't recall seeing this type of detail and the exodus of the object. The original that I saw on the news never perplexed me as this Spanish video as I've not seen this mush detail.
Originally posted by smurfy
Originally posted by Bearack
reply to post by Just Chris
I remember the original video as it was on the news but I don't recall seeing this type of detail and the exodus of the object. The original that I saw on the news never perplexed me as this Spanish video as I've not seen this mush detail.
JPL/NASA have that footage somewhere. What you see is akin to looking down into a long tube at the end of it, then the whole tube is pulled back into the corona.
Originally posted by Bearack
Originally posted by smurfy
Originally posted by Bearack
reply to post by Just Chris
I remember the original video as it was on the news but I don't recall seeing this type of detail and the exodus of the object. The original that I saw on the news never perplexed me as this Spanish video as I've not seen this mush detail.
JPL/NASA have that footage somewhere. What you see is akin to looking down into a long tube at the end of it, then the whole tube is pulled back into the corona.
I can go with that theory and I appreciate any insight to this, however, how does this theory explain what seems to be a mass pulling away and impacting the vortexes as though a disruption of the atmosphere of the sun?
Granted, that might just be an anomaly of what you mention.
Originally posted by Just Chris
I'm sorry, but I don't see nothing new here.
That's not to say the original video isn't breath-taking, because it really is, but everything that could have possibly been discussed about this video already has been.edit on 14-12-2012 by Just Chris because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by IMSAM
oh its THAT video again
www.abovetopsecret.com...
"A NASA astrophysicist says the image is completely normal. "Filaments appear to be dark because they're cooler in relation to what's in the background. When you look at it from the edge of the sun, what you see is this spherical object and you're actually looking down the tunnel." NASA says it is rare for a prominence to form as such a distinct shape however. Generally, a prominence comes in the form of a violent outburst, rather than the sphere seen in the video above."
On the 8th of March of this year (2012) an image was captured by a NASA telescope (SDO- Solar Dynamics Observatory); a telescope that monitors the Sun. It was a gigantic object bigger than the Earth itself that approached the Sun and stood adjacent to it for about 80 hours. So, our "partners" of the 49 ET races explained the whole situation. That it was one of their spaceships that stood by the Sun in order to try to stabilize its activities by throwing chemicals on the Sun´s surface. And that this situation is going to be repeated on the 17th of December 2012 at 1:15PM Brasilia time for 4 hours and 15 minutes
Originally posted by sirric
Well here's a kicker, take from this what you will
On the 8th of March of this year (2012) an image was captured by a NASA telescope (SDO- Solar Dynamics Observatory); a telescope that monitors the Sun. It was a gigantic object bigger than the Earth itself that approached the Sun and stood adjacent to it for about 80 hours. So, our "partners" of the 49 ET races explained the whole situation. That it was one of their spaceships that stood by the Sun in order to try to stabilize its activities by throwing chemicals on the Sun´s surface. And that this situation is going to be repeated on the 17th of December 2012 at 1:15PM Brasilia time for 4 hours and 15 minutes
Can't wait to see if this happens, or not.
I'll admit if this does happen like this guy says it does, I'll stop all debunking of UFO's...edit on 16/12/12 by sirric because: (no reason given)