It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RickKilgannon
Originally posted by roguetechie
reply to post by Mully
If you really want to see incidents like this stopped you will fight as hard as you can for universal concealed carry reciprocity agreements as well as bills overturning the federal ban on carry in schools, especially for teachers.
Personally it is my belief that we entrust the school system with the lives and minds of our children and they should take that seriously by arming and training teachers to defend our children should the worst happen.
I agree with this. Why not set it up like ongoing training for teachers. Let the ones that want to take the classes take them & let them legally carry in schools. Go as far as putting a small gun safe in the classrooms that only the teachers have access too. It would not be that hard to do this.
Originally posted by delusion
Originally posted by triune
My first question this tragedy and all similar mass murders is, what part did prescription medication play in this person going beserk.
This will be a closely guarded peice of information. We cant have people knowing that 'medicine' can turn a person into a maniacal killer.
I honestly think that's as important a debate to have as the one on guns; and I wonder if any who bring it up in public will be shut down?
The danger is that if you are on the same drugs that he was, then people will suspect you of being a potential risk.
These drugs could probably be eliminated (slowly) from people's systems without that much loss to our society except to the companies' stock value; nutrition and exercise and life interests and hobbies would be much better substiitutes. If only these were 'pushed' as much as the drug 'solutions' are.
They only cover up the wound, they don't stop it from festering underneath the shiny bandaid.
edit on 16-12-2012 by delusion because: (no reason given)edit on 16-12-2012 by delusion because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by salainen
Do you know much about pharmacology? I don't really, but I do know some people need drugs, and nutrition/excercise etc. is not going to do anything.
After the haters from the infamous church posted their intentions to picket the funerals of the twenty children killed in the shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary School, Anonymous responded by re-posting the personal and professional information for members of the church on the Internet. Now the general public can contact the church members directly and tell them what they think about people who would desecrate the funerals of murdered children.
...
They claimed their website was protected by God. Big mistake. A few days later, while a Westboro spokeswoman was boasting about how the church foiled Anonymous on a radio talk show, an Anonymous spokesman called in and hacked the church’s website in real time on the air.
Originally posted by salainen
Originally posted by Tecumte
Beautiful, very succinct, I whole heartedly agree, like a scripted Hollywood production, not just this one shooting (which COULD, maybe??? have been 'radom' ---though I still have reservations) but a string with the same type MOs, and not just here in the states but as I pointed out several times Canada and Great Britian and Australia, etc. over and over and over, usuallly masked, in the shadows, lights out, smoke bombs, emotionally and mentally ill (alleged) shooters, I really smell a NWO rat, one that would stop at nothing to further humanity into that Brave New (gunless, microchipped, 24/7 surveilled, greatly population reduced, collective) World.
I find it far more believable that someone with severe mental illness and autism would kill children than a group of masterminds... NWO had nothing to do with this, it wouldn't make sense, whereas someone with severe mental illness, wouldn't make sense, and hence would do something like this.
Originally posted by starviego
Originally posted by nightstalker78
Don't be naive. Of course the gub'mint would let them die. Like they did teacher Dave Sanders at Columbine, whom they ignored for four hours until he finally bled to death.
Originally posted by PaperbackWriter
And how did they handle it today? From a printed fact sheet they gave to all reporters at the same
time. That could have been done for every bit of info all along, could it not?
Do you get the feeling they are making this stuff up as they go along?
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by starviego
Do you get the feeling they are making this stuff up as they go along?
I do.
I sure do.
A planned attack would never have so many inconsistencies, it's too suspicious; a well planned cover story would be ready to be fed out as soon as people realised something was happening.
Originally posted by Flighty
If his mother was an avid collector of guns and she often talked about her "gun collection" at the local beer tasting every Tuesday (as has been reported), then it might be possible that she bought a few " under the counter" so to speak that aren't coming up under her name as they weren't legal.
I'm leaning towards to this idea as it seems to make the most sense.