posted on Dec, 14 2012 @ 05:28 PM
reply to post by Char-Lee
Chadwickus just showed an articel by a local observer, I read that thread last year too, its an intresting topic.
But if we talk about a shadow of a singular point of light (the sun) on a sphere (earth) it would be logical to interperted it as such. Maybe we can
find proof the shape of earth is changing, idk but we are not only talking about sunlight through a window or behind some mountains. Look at the
bigger scheme, if sunlight didn't change, what happened in that parts the inuit claim differences. Melting icecaps souns logical but not only about
the lowering of the ice caps we could also argue that the less mass of the ice has less pressure on that parts of earth and so that parts will rise
again and other parts will lower.
I'm not saying it is happening or not. I just want to make clear it is logical to look at the scale. We are talking about.. If we have pretty huge
imo changes in locations with some big earthquakes why couldn't be something similair happening there..
As example if a volcano is building up pressure for 10 years the mountain containing the volcanic hotspot will grow, a local observation could claim
the sun is coming later over that mountain, while in fact the sun is pretty much normal it is the mountain that is changing.
Just trying to show as many angles of information needed to get to the truth.