It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The magnificent views across Damascus from the presidential palace on Mount Qassioun are unlikely to provide much comfort these days for Bashar al-Assad, Syria’s beleaguered head of state.
For several weeks, the skyline to the north, east, and south has been stained by black columns of smoke from artillery explosions and air strikes as Syrian government forces struggle to prevent the Free Syrian Army (FSA) rebels from inching ever closer to their goal of unseating Mr. Assad’s regime.
After 20 months of confrontation, Assad’s hold on power is looking increasingly frail, leaving him
The conflict in Syria has been raging for 629 days. Between Internet blockades and the serious threat to journalists' safety, public reporting on social networks has been a primary--and sometimes unreliable--source of information. That's left Syria watchers bouncing from news site to news site, piecing together information from different sources.
Originally posted by seeker1963
reply to post by Spike Spiegle
See the pattern? Don't buy into the peaceful US government wanting to promote peace in the Middle East!
Your title would be more accurate if it said, "As Al Qaeda moves in........."
Originally posted by seeker1963
reply to post by Spike Spiegle
I am just disgusted with the garbage that the MSM is telling us about Syria. Do I think Assad is a good guy? Nope! However my reply was more or less for those who are buying into the propoganda that the FSA are the good guys when the facts are available to show how the US is yet prepared to destroy the infrastructure of yet another country that has a leader not playing by there rules to put in another Al Qaeda run nation in power.
No apologies needed, I jumped the gun too, anyway I agree with your above quoted text.
I can't deny those facts.
Russia cannot win, so NATO will get nuked first on a preemtive strike if Russia has sense
No folly in mentioning nuclear weapons.
Originally posted by Spike Spiegle
reply to post by butcherguy
When talking about this conflict / region someone always has to mention the really big guns ( nukes )
Such folly to even whisper a mention of using Nuclear Weapons...
SS
Originally posted by Alternative4u
reply to post by seeker1963
Yes your right NATO is trying to appease Muslim states, but that is mostly because NATO are wanting Muslims to start to attack Russia, once Russia are busy with that NATO will start on Russia too, Russia cannot win, so NATO will get nuked first on a preemtive strike if Russia has sense.
President Assad has told Russian TV that any Western intervention would have catastrophic worldwide consequences, and said he would “live and die” in Syria.
“The United States is against me and the West is against me and many other Arab countries, including Turkey which is not Arab of course, are against me. If the Syrian people are against me, how can I be here?” he said.
“It is not about reconciling with the people and it is not about reconciliation between the Syrians and the Syrians; we do not have a civil war. It is about terrorism and the support coming from abroad to terrorists to destabilise Syria. This is our war.”