It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
Well I"m not the type to bet my life or consciousness. What would you have preferred in my bet that this won't happen?
Good works, curiosity, my pets, my family?
either way this ascension/evolution business is pure and utter BS.
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
Aren't you the proponent of Planet x/Nibiru whatever you are now calling it and saying "it's here"? Wouldn't such a "system" as you've called create huge changes in planetary orbits and massive upheavals on Earth?
Now are you saying that stuff won't happen and now ascension and evolution may take place instead?
Are you backtracking on all your threads and posts on "Planet X" to make way for this new unfounded speculation?
edit on 12/9/2012 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by zedVSzardoz
reply to post by JesterTerrestrial
I get what you are saying.
The quantum flux state of the isolinear induction phase in isomorphic isotopes, positively charged of coarse, makes the entire process of intro-active photonic bombardment less volatile allowing for negatively charged ions to permeate the main matrix and produce oscillating frequencies that incorporate the field data asproduced by an isometric sensor adapted for rotating bio-electric frequencies. In this state of linear quantum flux and isomorphic isotopes being emitted in conjunction with nominal output from a standard ion generating amplifier at a rate of 98.5 quantumrifts per second a subatomic parse fold can be generated. In this consideration we must revisit the linear phase isotopes and maximize the output so as to resonate the charges particles so they rotate their half life between 5 and 4 milliseconds from pod to field to induction phase.
The new algorithm then must be 23h+2.4x(yn)*287π÷[FTP4]^957q√×34Y
If not the sub molecular instability will translate into a new phase vortex when the mass of the new particles are expelled from the busard collectors. That would be fine if the matrix incorporated an inline field projection of 9 .7 Kelvin maintained throughout the prime mode reduction to Max force distribution. We know that is not possible with the earths current magnetic field harmonics, unless we drive singular kortex tower into 12 prime locations along alpha zeta grid. This is not an option since as you know the capacity Gama grid is set to overlap the omega grid in 36 hours and will remain "nodes on" for 5 cycles.
I was wondering how you circumvented the positronic relay inductors without amplifying the phase coil inductors to double capacity? Did you use a solid state polaron drive charge to stimulate the isotopes to decay or am I completely off?
The main factor in the frequency resonating modulations is that more inertia at initial reaction rotations causes a premature decay in the on/off nodes as opposed to the off/ on nodes. The half life of the thermotropic repelers makes for inert resonance with calamorphonic trions. In this case I suggest that you take a standard mortaphasic inductor and reverse the polarity to make the isolinear field coalescence reverberate back into the positronic relays.
Then its easy as pie!
Originally posted by karen61560
reply to post by prevenge
"bugs crawling through the flesh" .. This is something meth users talk about all the time. They tear their faces up trying to get them.
Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
Well I"m not the type to bet my life or consciousness. What would you have preferred in my bet that this won't happen?
Good works, curiosity, my pets, my family?
either way this ascension/evolution business is pure and utter BS.
You are inferring that people must risk something or "bet" something if they ascribe to this view.
That is what is known as a "false dichotomy".
As I said at the top of the 2nd page in this thread, people can have this philosophy with no downside, as long as no one is advocating suicide, the OP isn't and I'm not.
Anyway, I don't want to go off topic too much and I'd be happy to discuss these ideas with you on another thread if you so desire.
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
I wasn'y saying one must bet something.
I was merely showing how sure I am that no evolution or "ascension" will happen on that date.
Clear?
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
I have debated these things in other threads of yours.
Even when shown facts that dispute what you are saying you either blow them off, ignore them, or post yet more "bad science".
I hesitate to even call it bad science since it bears no resemblance to facts or science.
reply to post by LightAssassin
Originally posted by LightAssassin
reply to post by JesterTerrestrial
Please include your link as clearly this work has been COPIED from various new age sites. Please provide the link otherwise it will be classed as plagiarism and the mods will have to be alerted and all the copy and pasting would have been all for naught.
So when you resort to mainstream science such as NASA to back up your arguments, many on here are not going to take you seriously.
just wanted to show why many here do not trust mainstream thinking or science and why threads like this are so popular,