Photo of Nibiru? What do you think?

reply to post by Phage


Now Phage I absolutly know that I have seen a full moon during the day and the moon and the sun have shared the sky many times that I alone have noticed. Mostly though the full moon is in the sky alone.

Originally posted by rockymcgilicutty

Originally posted by sparky31
its a lens flare,why do people keep thinking its anything else?seriously if something was there then not every amateur astronomer in the world is going to be silenced and would report something like this......the fact that no ones shouting about it tells you what you need to know.

Your statement makes complete and total sense.What are you doing on this thread?People don't want to hear anything here that makes sense.

lol so i,ve found out since i joined.....i came here for things that can,t be explained.

reply to post by Oneggod


Very convenient that you dont know the original source for this. How about the name of the NASA official? No dont have that either? Oh well, guess we just go on your saying so to make is so.

I'm not saying Nibiru exists but there is something it needs to be considered.
Ordinary phone cameras have the ability to catch infrared light emissions which is outside of human visible spectrum.
Food for thought, just sayin'

reply to post by sparky31


I know, these amatures want their name on anything in the sky. They would be shouting from the rooftops and looking for credit for finding it too. Wouldnt you love to have a comet named after you?

Originally posted by zilebeliveunknown
I'm not saying Nibiru exists but there is something it needs to be considered.
Ordinary phone cameras have the ability to catch infrared light emissions which is outside of human visible spectrum.
Food for thought, just sayin'

How far from the visible spectrum? Are you claiming they're capable of Thermography?

Originally posted by DragonFire1024

Originally posted by karen61560
reply to post by Druscilla

 

Interesting that Jupiter took a large hit from an asteroid today !

Planets, the moon, earth and everything else is hit by meteors almost constantly. Even small ones no one really notices.

Yeah yeah what your point? I said it was interesting in lew of what the other poster said about Jupiter and Nibiru. I didnt make a claim that is was an anomoly of any kind. Oh and not a meteor but a very large asteroid. Jupiter takes hits for us all the time with its large gravitational field. Some feel that life on earth would not have gotten a start without jupiter cleaning up the mess up there.

Originally posted by DragonFire1024

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by DragonFire1024

 

The source didn't say it was Nibiru. He said it was the moon. Or wait...the moon is a logical theory here, so cross the source off right?

Not only did the source say it was the Moon but a "Fading full Moon". Do you NOT see the problem with that?
Check phase and size.

See my post above this one...what he says doesn't matter in this case. The photographic evidence speaks for itself.

edit on 8-12-2012 by DragonFire1024 because: (no reason given)

The second photo you posted definitely looks a lens flare, the first... it almost looks like the bright spot is the moon, then there's a reflection of the moon that's not overexposed, but I don't know if that's possible. Why does the photo look like it's taken at night?
Maybe this picture is possible if taken near the poles.
(EDIT... The photo description even says it... Russell's moon reflection.)

But the point I think you are missing is that a full moon can NEVER be near the setting or rising sun.
A new moon can be in the same side of the sky when the sun rises, as evidenced by the last solar eclipse.
A solar eclipse always takes place with a new or newish moon, during the day. A lunar eclipse always with a full or fullish moon, and at night. The full moon always rises in the east, AS THE SUN IS SETTING.
It's not possible for it to be the moon, uness it was new.

I have to agree that the proposed 'lens flare' does not seem to mirror the sun, but maybe more examples are needed to show how this is possible.

reply to post by neformore


I do think Nibiru is rubbish however it is possible for something to be seen in the sky in one place and not in another. We do not have full view of every eclispe do we? No because sometimes we are facing the wrong way. In the winter what I see in the sky is completely different than what they see in the winter sky in Australia. Position does matter.

Originally posted by Jusvistn
but you have to admit that every photo ever taken by anybody that has seen an object behind or beside the sun gets discredited as a lens flare and/or a nutcase.

That's because there is no object beside the sun. If there were then tens of thousands of amateurs around the globe with proper cameras and filters would have massively documented it long ago.

Originally posted by karen61560

Interesting that Jupiter took a large hit from an asteroid today !

Can you link to this please? I looked and found two articles, one from yesterday
www.dailymail.co.uk... ad-night.html

and one from september,
www.themarysue.com...

Which shows the picture and tells the same story used in the one from a day ago.

So it looks like they were recycling old news, or they got the wrong footage and story?

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation

Originally posted by zilebeliveunknown
I'm not saying Nibiru exists but there is something it needs to be considered.
Ordinary phone cameras have the ability to catch infrared light emissions which is outside of human visible spectrum.
Food for thought, just sayin'

How far from the visible spectrum? Are you claiming they're capable of Thermography?

Well of course they aren't capable of thermography. I wouldn't go in technical characteristics as I'm not much familiar with the matter, but here try simple experiment it's completly safe. While your phone camera is on, point your remote control IR light towards it and press any button...

Originally posted by karen61560
reply to post by Phage

 

Now Phage I absolutly know that I have seen a full moon during the day and the moon and the sun have shared the sky many times that I alone have noticed. Mostly though the full moon is in the sky alone.

When the moon is full, it is on the opposite side of the earth than the sun. So the full moon will rise when the sun sets and the full moon will set when the sun rises.

Ill have a cold beer ready for the Nibir(ites) when they get here

Originally posted by zilebeliveunknown

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation

Originally posted by zilebeliveunknown
I'm not saying Nibiru exists but there is something it needs to be considered.
Ordinary phone cameras have the ability to catch infrared light emissions which is outside of human visible spectrum.
Food for thought, just sayin'

How far from the visible spectrum? Are you claiming they're capable of Thermography?

Well of course they aren't capable of thermography. I wouldn't go in technical characteristics as I'm not much familiar with the matter, but here try simple experiment it's completly safe. While your phone camera is on, point your remote control IR light towards it and press any button...

I just tried this simple experiment. Took three different remotes into a completely dark room and pressed some buttons. Visible red light from mine. In order to verify I would need a remote that emits no visible light. Many digital cameras have IR blocking filters also.

I've heard this argument before but can't find enough info about it. I'm trying to find out how far into the IR spectrum their sensitivity extends but also why something would reflect IR but not visible light. That part doesn't make sense to me.

reply to post by Artlicious

FYI, your GPS location is still embedded in your photos EXIF information...

Originally posted by gavron
reply to post by Artlicious

 

FYI, your GPS location is still embedded in your photos EXIF information...

Interesting I didn't even know that info was there. But that's fine.


So I've Googled the term "green orb, sun, lens flare" and looked at images. There are other pics that look to have a similar "flare".. however in none of them do you see something overlapping the flare, as you do in mine.


As I said before, I'm sure it's not the Moon, I guess it's most likely not Nibiru or a Planet X, but I'm still not 100% convinced it's a flare. I will try to recapture a similar image tomorrow morning if it's sunny and see if I can duplicate this. Hopefully there will be more contrails in the sky overlapping the Sun.




Also the contrail that overlaps my green orb goes beyond the orb, from left to right. How can this be if no more than a mirror image?

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by Artlicious

 

What do you think the green orb is in that pic I posted?

edit on 8-12-2012 by DenyObfuscation because: Add "in"

I think it looks similar to others I've found online, however I don't see anything overlapping it as I do in mine. Plus I see a lot more flare and glare, not seen in mine.

I don't know, I'm defiantly no expert, just an amateur who thought he found something interesting. That's why I brought it here.. for the experts to analyze and dissect..

reply to post by Artlicious


Thanks for the reply, it reminded me to post this other pic I took.

As you can see, the green and white orbs are clearly reflections or the tree is transparent.

I think it looks similar to others I've found online, however I don't see anything overlapping it as I do in mine. Plus I see a lot more flare and glare, not seen in mine.

IIRC I used a couple of sunglass lenses as a filter of sorts causing multiple reflections. Point is, cameras can do funny things with light. It's not identical to yours but there is a pic in the thread that shows that overlap as well.

reply to post by Artlicious


Nice catch OP.

I don't know if it's Nibiru or Planet X, but it is definitely not a lens flare, and those that say it is obviously do not know much about photography. I'm open to other explanations that don't involve the word "lens" and/or "flare".

It is clearly obvious the clouds across the Sun in your pic do not match up with the one layer of clould over your orb, the size and angle are off.

It is just like this YouTube video I posted a while back, when the Sun goes behind a cloud and the orb remained completely unobscured and it was still called a lens flare.

Then the Sun came out from behind the clouds - AND THE ORB WENT BEHIND THE CLOUDS AT THE SAME TIME. Lens flares do not go behind clouds, especially when the main light source is completely unobscured.

Think about it - if Planet X/Nibiru exists and the governements of the world would not be able to help the citizenry - would it be covered up? Of course.

Start at 14 seconds in:



Good luck to all and peace.