It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(Reuters) - Britain and Germany may have missed out on a combined $1 billion in sales tax since online marketplace eBay picked a tiny Luxembourg office as its base for EU sales, a shift that lawmakers say should now be investigated.
EBay's nomination of Luxembourg unit eBay Europe Sarl - with a staff of nine - as its provider of services to EU clients allows it to charge customers in Europe a low rate of sales tax, often known as Value Added Tax, helping it to compete against rivals.
However, the unit doesn't actually receive the money from sales. Instead, eBay said it continues to channel revenues through a Berne-based unit, allowing the company also to benefit from what Swiss tax lawyers say is the most competitive corporate income tax regime in Europe.
EU rules allow companies to establish subsidiaries in Luxembourg and levy VAT at Luxembourg's low VAT rate on sales to customers across the bloc.
However, the rules also allow individual EU taxmen to challenge any claim to Luxembourg residence, and the right to charge Luxembourg VAT, in their domestic courts, if the taxman feels a Luxembourg-based subsidiary does not have sufficient staff or assets to support its claim to be the true supplier of goods or services.
Tax experts say eBay's arrangement, which appears to give eBay the best of both income and sales tax worlds, could be open to challenge, and lawmakers in the UK and Germany want their taxmen to investigate.
Are you denying the fact that the wealthy have not been pulling their fiscal weight and, furthermore, lobbying for special treatment on the backs of the middle and poor classes? Deregulation, tax cuts, bailouts free trade agreements. All these amounted to trillions in handouts for the "job creators", as conservative pundits like to call them. Where are the jobs? The largest recession since the great depression and the wealthy are wealthier than ever.
Both parties catered heavely towards the mega rich while feeding the middle and poor classes to the wolves. Dems and republicans. Both are scum in that aspect. Im talking about the reality of the situation here, not party politics. What needs to be done needs to be done, dont you agree?
edit on 5-12-2012 by Snoopy1978 because: Ipad
Originally posted by neo96
Gonna make the evil rich pay come hell or highwater!
That is not going to fix a damn thing.
Boehner caves he is worthless.
Originally posted by BrianG
The first thing to remember is that the richer you are the easier it is to not pay your fair share.
There is the genius of his plan, his Canadian company can be charged more for every part from his Hong Kong company and in the end make little or no real profit and not pay much tax. Here he would have paid close to 40% income taxe on his earnings in Canada.
Originally posted by Snoopy1978
reply to post by seeker1963
Are you denying the fact that the wealthy have not been pulling their fiscal weight and, furthermore, lobbying for special treatment on the backs of the middle and poor classes? Deregulation, tax cuts, bailouts free trade agreements. All these amounted to trillions in handouts for the "job creators", as conservative pundits like to call them. Where are the jobs? The largest recession since the great depression and the wealthy are wealthier than ever.
Both parties catered heavely towards the mega rich while feeding the middle and poor classes to the wolves. Dems and republicans. Both are scum in that aspect. Im talking about the reality of the situation here, not party politics. What needs to be done needs to be done, dont you agree?edit on 5-12-2012 by Snoopy1978 because: Ipad
So Boehner is NOT controlled by corporations and the "mega-rich?" Doesn't that attack the position of a very loud segment of ATSers that claim that control exists, at least over the Republicans, if not everybody? "Inches closer?" What? This is what he's been saying from the beginning, he's not "inching" anywhere. From your source:
There you have it, folks. Against his corporate handlers' wishes, Boehner inches closer to reality. Taxes MUST go up for the top 2%ers. Let the robe-tearing and gnashing of teeth begin, conservative ats'ers!
He says it could be done without raising tax rates. Why should conservatives be upset that his position hasn't changed?
"We have got to cut spending and I believe it is appropriate to put revenues on the table," Boehner told reporters on Wednesday. "Now, the revenues that we are putting on the table are going to come from guess who? The rich."
He continued, "There are ways to limit deductions, close loopholes and have the same people pay more of their money to the federal government without raising tax rates, which we believe will harm our economy."
Is this the "fair share" argument again? The question is, what is their fiscal weight? Until there's a reasonable answer, I can only see that as an opinion, so, yes, I am denying the "fact."
Are you denying the fact that the wealthy have not been pulling their fiscal weight
Low-income workers stand to lose the most if lawmakers fail to reach a consensus on the Bush-era tax cuts, according to a new report from the Tax Foundation. The report states that on Jan. 1 the doubling of the child tax credit, increased standard deductions and income credits and the creation of the 10 percent tax bracket — all of which primarily aimed at non-wealthy taxpayers — will vanish if gridlock persists in Washington.
While wealthier taxpayers pay more in taxes and stand to lose more money if the tax cuts expire, the impact on low-income taxpayers will be far greater because they live on slimmer margins.
Democratic leaders have repeatedly vowed that tax cuts benefiting these taxpayers will be extended beyond their Dec. 31 expiration date. But a similar promise was made last year on the estate tax, and ten months have passed without Democratic leaders following through on that promise.