It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spleenika
reply to post by Just Chris
I thought Rodents had legs. You know, that touch the ground.
Originally posted by endocosmos
There is actually two rodents there, a larger one with his back to the photo, and the other with his/her right
side to the camera. People have made a religion of NASA, and will defend the moon project and their other delusional manipulations to the death.It is a matter of credulity.
There is no doubt in my mind they are filming somewhere on earth, probably in the Nevada or Arizona desert on a highly secure military base.
It is obvious to me that the color rendition of the landscape is completely artificial.
Over 30 years of technology since Viking 1, and billions of dollars, and they cannot produce video from Mars?
Think about it.
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by gortex
That particlular creature is not a rock and to even try to insist it is, is to try and make people believe crap when their own eyes KNOW 100% otherwise.
This isn't a guess. IT'S 100% PROOF OF A RODENT ON A NASA PHOTO THAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE TAKEN ON MARS.
That is a RAT. We had them in our kitchen and were putting them in cages and releasing them at the creek till we tinfoiled up the holes and taped them and got the 2 cats.
Eyes work just fine.
I was wondering what the Gorillas on Mars were doing for food. Maybe they're eating these rocks shaped like rats/guinea pigs?
Originally posted by ZetaExplorer15
Boy that rock... uhh I mean rodent....really knows how to survive on a barren wasteland.