It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by buster2010
Muslim's have to pay taxes so why shouldn't non Muslims? People like to claim that America is a Christian nation so are Christians extorting taxes from non Christians?
Originally posted by Mclaneinc
I'd like to see them try and enforce it here in the UK, mind you after a rather radical known group had their mega mosque request turned down I suspect they would try anything.
Again, this only applies to Islamic states and as far as I know from earlier today we are still not an Islamic state (officially).
Its about time people were treated as individuals and not religious / political groups.
One rule for us all please, that's the way it works best....
Originally posted by butcherguy
Some countries only apply the jizya if you are JEWISH.
Originally posted by Expat888
funny... am buddhist and have lived in islamic countries in the past NEVER got taxed for not being muslim.
Maybe someday they will come for the Buddhists.
]
Were you okay with this?te
Buddhas of Bamiyan
Originally posted by maes2
1)You say "Jazia is approximately an obsolete law in Islam."
Well you may not be aware that there are many muslims who are demanding that Jizya be practised .
Now before you claim that I am lying,i present to you ->
I never say that you are lying. I know how those black sheeps are.
2)You say " and that was not just because of not accepting Islam. "
Yes you are right.It is because of the protection that the state has to provide too.
It is for 'allowing them to practice their religion too'.
yes I know that you wrote the truth but :
1-in that time Mohammad was a leader of a popular and legitimate government. Taliban and those radical terrorist groups are neither a government nor legitimate.
2-in that time there were no concept of nationality. so the minority christians and jews did not participate in wars neither for and nor against polytheists in the neighbourhood. because of such exemptions they would pay Jazia as a tax. and Muslims would pay Zakat as a tax.
3-Mohammad was not cruel against minorities. because monotheistic religions are all from one source and Koran declares it many times. the only conflict between Mohammad and other religions I can remember now is when the minority jews broke the agreement and cooperated with foreign Polytheists and that conflict ended without any bloodshed and the minority jews gave in without any war. and I can not remember any conflict between Mohammad and chiristians ! there were no conflict between them. not at all !!
(a)Taliban are not black sheep's .They are human just like us.They fight for Islam.
The dictionary defination of human is :-
I did not mean they were sheeps, black sheep was an idiom. it means they are the cause of humiliation of real Islam.
"A fundamentalist Muslim group that controlled much of Afghanistan from 1995 until U.S. military intervention in 2001"
Afghans had been fighting with those radicals even before any USA's intervention. moreover Taliban has still enough power to oppress people.
3)You say "those radicals are laying."
I fail to understand why you wrote that statement.Do you want to make fun of me.Are are against me because I wrote against Jizya?
oh excuse me I meant lying.
5)You say "and the existence of those murderers is itself contrary to all monotheistic religions."
But you must not forget that the Taliban fight for Allah itself.And they follow the Quran too.
I am not making this up.For proof,refer here :-
oh yes and Taliban is following Koran the same that Bush followed Bible !!!!!!!
I know how they pray for God and then behead innocent people ! and how they suicide bombing here and there for the sake of God !!!! they have killed many of our people too ! the same that what they are doing in Syria and Iraq.
you mean Koran has said them to terror innocents. I do not think so. for real muslims Koran is regarded as God's speech to Mohammad and all of it's verses should be understood with considering the purpose and situations they revealed for. what those blinded radicals are not capable to do.
edit on 6-12-2012 by maes2 because: (no reason given)edit on 6-12-2012 by maes2 because: (no reason given)
1-in that time Mohammad was a leader of a popular and legitimate government. Taliban and those radical terrorist groups are neither a government nor legitimate.
Taliban and those radical terrorist groups are neither a government nor legitimate.
in that time there were no concept of nationality. so the minority christians and jews did not participate in wars neither for and nor against polytheists in the neighbourhood. because of such exemptions they would pay Jazia as a tax. and Muslims would pay Zakat as a tax.
Mohammad was not cruel against minorities.
because monotheistic religions are all from one source and Koran declares it many times.
the only conflict between Mohammad and other religions I can remember now is when the minority jews broke the agreement and cooperated with foreign Polytheists and that conflict ended without any bloodshed and the minority jews gave in without any war. and I can not remember any conflict between Mohammad and chiristians ! there were no conflict between them. not at all !!
I did not mean they were sheeps, black sheep was an idiom. it means they are the cause of humiliation of real Islam.
Afghans had been fighting with those radicals even before any USA's intervention. moreover Taliban has still enough power to oppress people.
oh excuse me I meant lying.
oh yes and Taliban is following Koran the same that Bush followed Bible !!!!!!!
I know how they pray for God and then behead innocent people ! and how they suicide bombing here and there for the sake of God !!!! they have killed many of our people too ! the same that what they are doing in Syria and Iraq.
you mean Koran has said them to terror innocents. I do not think so. for real muslims Koran is regarded as God's speech to Mohammad and all of it's verses should be understood with considering the purpose and situations they revealed for. what those blinded radicals are not capable to do.
in the past when there were wars between Polytheist and Islamic government under the rule of Mohammad those minorities (christians,jews,and atheists) did not engage in wars, so Jijya was some sort of tax that the minorities would pay because of their exemptions for participating in wars or governmental issues. also there were and there are other taxes for muslims which is called Zakat
that is not the speech of Mohammad it is regarded as speech of God to Mohammad.
some rules are secondary rules in Islam and they are free to be altered according to the situation of societies. for example Jijya was a rule according to the situation of that time but nowadays nationality is an identity. so people should participate in wars and governmental issues regardless of their Ideologies and even minorities. so there is no need for taxes like Jijya. but still Muslims should pay taxes like Zakat !
or Islam had some rules for slavery which was a usual event in that time. among many nations.
what people do not pay attention is that Koran has instructed people for freeing slaves many times.
the only true Islamic government was the Government of Mohammad but after his death gradually governments changed to inheritable monarchies (contrary to Islam). moreover Taliban,AlQaeda,Saudies,..... are just some black sheeps and even their existence is contrary to Islam !!!
Harun al-Rashid was someone like Saudies and Taliban. he was a cruel Monarchy. he did not know how to write Islam. Muslims have suffered from such dirty monarchies a lot.
as I said before those dirty monarchies (even Ottoman) were enemies of humanity they did not know how to write Islam !
in the Islamic Government under the rule of Muhammad even conversion could not be a solution because if they had converted to Islam they should have payed another tax called ZAKAT and they should have participated in wars against polytheists.
I myself prefer to remain atheist and pay Jazya in such conditions
so world has changed and the secondary laws of Islam (those that are related to governing like taxes, trading and ...) can change as well.
Originally posted by maung
Some people here tend to think or judge that islam is so bad, a plague that should be treated.
So islam is bad, barbaric, need to be destroy along with the one who practice it. And not good for humanity. So what these people gonna do now.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Any religion that demands people either convert to their beliefs or 'pay a tax' (or even die) IS A PLAGUE on the world. That is anti-freedom and it's dragging the world down.
Not 'destroy muslims' but try to educate the poor souls who are stuck in Islam ... educate them about what real freedom is ... educate them that they HAVE NO RIGHT to push their beliefs on those of us who don't buy it .. educate them that they HAVE NO RIGHT to dictate what a woman can or can't wear ... educate them that the world doesn't want to be dragged back 1500 years and that is what their Sharia law system would cause to happen ... educate them so they'll leave the rest of the planet alone ...
edit on 12/7/2012 by FlyersFan because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by maung
A strange way to educate "poor souls" indeed if with attacking and mocking without know enough about islam.
.Do you know what soul is? .
Originally posted by svmpua
I am a strong follower of Buddhism and Hinduism spirituality too.
Maybe you do not know how Muslims are destroying Buddhist and Hindu temples in Bangladesh and forcing them to either convert or leave.
All the goverment in the world demand the citizen to pay tax and it is a fact not a theory, while i dont know any society or country now demand to convert to islam or pay jizya or capital punishment. Should we destroy all the gov then.
From what i know, most society in the world still dictate what a woman and even a man can or cant wear. Try to wear a tinny panties around europe or US and see where it will get accepted. Those place supposed to be have more freedom.
Try to wear a tinny panties around europe or US and see where it will get accepted. Those place supposed to be have more freedom.
People will argue about in what extend it is acceptable, but this is always round and round in everytime where the limit is. Primitive tribe wear almost nothing and the modern civilization that "make" them wear more. Infact lots of fashion from many country that is part of them culture are not acceptable in "formal events" internationally, and even corporate events.Dress suit is a formal wear these days and it is not everyone culture.
In other way, not many people know what sharia law is. Most educated muslim know there will be no sharia law with full support from all muslim just because of sectarian inside islam and only a society with only 1 sect will be able to use sharia law. There will be lots of differences, and that is why hardly we can find a country with sharia law implemented even the number of muslim is around 1,6 billion. We try to make other understand the truth, but it is always the non muslim who know the most.
Originally posted by svmpua
reply to post by maung
What do you want to tell.Can you state it clearly?edit on 7-12-2012 by svmpua because: (no reason given)