It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by krossfyter
taken from Sura (chapter) 9:5 of the Koran. I?m reading this directly out of the book and this is from the Koran
'When the sacred months are passed, kill those who join other gods wherever you find them, and seize them, beleaguer them and lie in wait for them with every kind of ambush. But if they convert and observe prayer and pay the obligatory alms, then let them go their way.'
Originally posted by krossfyter
i know you made a parallel with the bible. does the bible tell us christians to kill those who dont believe like we do? where?
Originally posted by krossfyter
am i off or am i on to something?
Originally posted by another_one
Originally posted by krossfyter
am i off or am i on to something?
You're way off. Islam is Harmony, Love, Tolerance, and Peace.
Originally posted by another_one
Krossfyter, how many times can I say it lol
The "other side" is NOT Muslim because it violates basic Islam LAW. Murder of Innocents is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN, and ISLAMIC LAW cannot be modified and tampered with.
I bet you're still not satisfied.
Originally posted by krossfyter
you all say u are practicing the true islam.... the other side says the same...
Originally posted by Netchicken
Hmmm...
The problem is that the people attempting to answer your questions Krossfliter are feeling threatened, thats why you are feeling that they are against you.
There are some reasons for this...
Muslims don't debate the Koran like we debate the bible, they hold to a more literal interpretation of it that makes discussion a herasy. Whereas the Bible has been discussed, argued, disected and abused for the last 2000 years - and still come out tops.
Also what you and I consider 'islam' is not what they consider 'islam'. We hold different tags and emotional attachments to the word than muslims do despite using the same words. A similar thing happens when we discuss christianity, we have differnet meanings to the same words used by non christians - faith, obedience, sacrifice, etc.
A third threat you make to their belief is the two sides of Islam, the violent and the peaceful side. It is impossible to reconcile them so the best thing to is to avoid talking about it or to label the people as "non islamic". I supose christians might have a similar feeling about JW's or some other bible based cults that exist (true jesus church, mormans etc). We know that they are wrong and not christians, but try telling that to a non believer.
In the past I even used to post on an islamic messageboard (ummah.com(?))in an attempt to enter into dialogue and all I ever got was banned. The big difference as well was their aceptance of, and eagerness to, use abuse in their posts towards people who they considered infidels. When I had them on about it they couldn't see any problem in their words. Thats the difference the Holy Spirit makes.
So in the end its fruitless, the gulf is so big, and many islamic posters are too unequipped or unwilling to help bridge it.
Its one thing to memorise your koran, its another to actually understand it enough to be willing to debate it. In fact I have heard of muslims who were told not to debate it with christians as they would lose their faith.
[Edited on 5-5-2003 by Netchicken]
Originally posted by another_one
Originally posted by krossfyter
you all say u are practicing the true islam.... the other side says the same...
The "other side" is NOT Muslim because it violates basic Islam LAW. Murder of Innocents is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN, and ISLAMIC LAW cannot be modified and tampered with.
I know exactly what you're trying to stir up; you're saying that "nobody knows the true Islam", and I'm trying to explain it to you.
The other side is violating islamic LAWS. This is not tampering with any verses, or taking any verses literally, or changing anything else, it is a violation of islamic LAW.
Let me show you how your argument is illogical.
John Doe is arrested for DUI - Driving under the Influence.
The police claims that he is a criminal, but John Doe claims that he isn't.
Who do you believe, and why? JOHN DOE VIOLATED STATE LAW. YOU LOOK IT UP AND VERIFY!
In this case, terrorists violated ISLAMIC LAW. YOU LOOK IT UP AND VERIFY!
Peace and God Bless!
[Edited on 5-5-2003 by another_one]
Originally posted by krossfyter
Originally posted by another_one
Originally posted by krossfyter
you all say u are practicing the true islam.... the other side says the same...
The "other side" is NOT Muslim because it violates basic Islam LAW. Murder of Innocents is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN, and ISLAMIC LAW cannot be modified and tampered with.
I know exactly what you're trying to stir up; you're saying that "nobody knows the true Islam", and I'm trying to explain it to you.
The other side is violating islamic LAWS. This is not tampering with any verses, or taking any verses literally, or changing anything else, it is a violation of islamic LAW.
Let me show you how your argument is illogical.
John Doe is arrested for DUI - Driving under the Influence.
The police claims that he is a criminal, but John Doe claims that he isn't.
Who do you believe, and why? JOHN DOE VIOLATED STATE LAW. YOU LOOK IT UP AND VERIFY!
In this case, terrorists violated ISLAMIC LAW. YOU LOOK IT UP AND VERIFY!
Peace and God Bless!
[Edited on 5-5-2003 by another_one]
okay good analogy to explain yourself better. let me add to that... let me tell you why your analogy doesnt apply to what i am asking here.
national law on criminal conduct is pretty cut and dry in our nation... if you do something this and this will happen etc. and its in the books to prove it... there isnt two sides here debating the law of dwi. there isnt one side saying "no look this is really the dwi law and the other side is false"... anotherwords there is no question that driving under the influence is agianst the law... no one believes differently.
however in the world of religion or spirituality we have a different case and its not really that cut and dry. in the world of religion we have people believing different laws from the same religon etc. ... see my point? see why your analogy really is flawed in the end? i mean it works with your point of view but doesnt with mine also. in order for your analogy to fully work it has to work with answering my basic question but it fails because we are going from unquestionable... no two side law (national law) to religious... questionable two or more side laws or beliefs.
what you have to do here is rip these peoples (the other idea) beliefs that they understand true islam by understanding the arabic language fully which is what they claim to do. you have to kind of present a great counter argument to that. show me that thier understanding of the arabic language is off somehow other then saying it is.
peace
Originally posted by helen670
gota speak up here!!!
If 'Islam'' is such a loving religion, then why did so many Christians get ''Murdered ''' for not announcing the name '''Allah'' ???
This question came up with a friend of myn who is 'muslim'' She could not answer me..........Although she does not agree with the Murders, she gave no answer..........Neither could her parents.............And they full on beleive that Muhammed was a man of goodness.........
Answer me that........How can you say '''Islam'' is a loving one.......???
Christians chose God and the Sword of the Muslims.......
Rather then speaking against their True Saviour........Jesus Christ........
I would do the same today...........I would rather Die,be tortured ,murdered,slayed,call it whatever, ........then dinounce my faith in Jesus Christ........and follow a religion of Muhammed...........
Originally posted by another_one
Originally posted by krossfyter
Originally posted by another_one
Originally posted by krossfyter
you all say u are practicing the true islam.... the other side says the same...
The "other side" is NOT Muslim because it violates basic Islam LAW. Murder of Innocents is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN, and ISLAMIC LAW cannot be modified and tampered with.
I know exactly what you're trying to stir up; you're saying that "nobody knows the true Islam", and I'm trying to explain it to you.
The other side is violating islamic LAWS. This is not tampering with any verses, or taking any verses literally, or changing anything else, it is a violation of islamic LAW.
Let me show you how your argument is illogical.
John Doe is arrested for DUI - Driving under the Influence.
The police claims that he is a criminal, but John Doe claims that he isn't.
Who do you believe, and why? JOHN DOE VIOLATED STATE LAW. YOU LOOK IT UP AND VERIFY!
In this case, terrorists violated ISLAMIC LAW. YOU LOOK IT UP AND VERIFY!
Peace and God Bless!
[Edited on 5-5-2003 by another_one]
okay good analogy to explain yourself better. let me add to that... let me tell you why your analogy doesnt apply to what i am asking here.
national law on criminal conduct is pretty cut and dry in our nation... if you do something this and this will happen etc. and its in the books to prove it... there isnt two sides here debating the law of dwi. there isnt one side saying "no look this is really the dwi law and the other side is false"... anotherwords there is no question that driving under the influence is agianst the law... no one believes differently.
however in the world of religion or spirituality we have a different case and its not really that cut and dry. in the world of religion we have people believing different laws from the same religon etc. ... see my point? see why your analogy really is flawed in the end? i mean it works with your point of view but doesnt with mine also. in order for your analogy to fully work it has to work with answering my basic question but it fails because we are going from unquestionable... no two side law (national law) to religious... questionable two or more side laws or beliefs.
what you have to do here is rip these peoples (the other idea) beliefs that they understand true islam by understanding the arabic language fully which is what they claim to do. you have to kind of present a great counter argument to that. show me that thier understanding of the arabic language is off somehow other then saying it is.
peace
Sigh.. I tried and tried but it's not really working. I suggest you learn arabic then, read the Qur'an, study Islamic teachings and history, and tell me which side you believe. I'll say it again - there is nothing to believe. There is not much of a difference in the translations my friend, the basic laws are written clear as day, and they are NOT arguing about it. Have you ever interviewed an "islamic" terrorist?
No, then don't say what they claim.
I tried my best. =)
Peace.