It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If the rival candle company does not want you there, they will just kill you.
Originally posted by Trustfund
reply to post by hayek11
Capitalism is the anti-thesis of freedom. It is based off the exploitation of other classes.
DETROIT -- A group of current and former Chrysler LLC workers who have long sought to have employees buy the auto maker are appealing to the Obama administration's auto task force in a longshot bid to win support for the idea...
What these so called "anarcho"-capitalists fail to realise, is that the state is the result of capitalism. A state system will always form around capitalism. Capitalism can not exist without it.
Originally posted by hayek11
Originally posted by Trustfund
reply to post by hayek11
Capitalism is the anti-thesis of freedom. It is based off the exploitation of other classes.
1. Why should we divide society into classes? They are, at best, false constructs imposed artificially on a world made up of the only real entities: individuals.
Originally posted by hawkiye
What a load of bovine excrement! It is your commie marxist BS that cannot exist without the state to enforce its theft you commies call wealth redistribution.
Capitalism must have a free market to exist and we do not have that and have not had it for at least 60 years... The commies here that obsessively call their marxist thievery capitalism over and over are getting tiresome...
Originally posted by ANOK
Honestly I think you're just upset because you can't deny what I say, and it upsets your world view.
edit on 12/1/2012 by ANOK because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by hawkiye
What a load of bovine excrement! It is your commie marxist BS that cannot exist without the state to enforce its theft you commies call wealth redistribution.
Socialism is ultimately stateless. I am not a Marxist. And why so rude?
Capitalism must have a free market to exist and we do not have that and have not had it for at least 60 years... The commies here that obsessively call their marxist thievery capitalism over and over are getting tiresome...
But capitalism is not free-markets. Capitalism is the private ownership of the means of production. A term coined by the LEFT. Free-markets have existed for centuries, capitalism is only around 250 years old. Capitalism has never been and never will be free-markets. If you really think you are free, then you don't understand what freedom is.
If you think a minority monopolising the means to produce is a free-market system then you fail to understand it.
True freedom can only come to all when we all have access to the means to produce, so that no one take advantage of the majority by their private economic ownership.
Sorry you're tired of hearing it, I'm tired of ignorance! Deny ignorance, eh? Honestly I think you're just upset because you can't deny what I say, and it upsets your world view.
edit on 12/1/2012 by ANOK because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by hawkiye
while denigrating capitalism when everything you describe as capitalism is socialism/communism/marxism/fascism or what ever you brand it on any given day which are all just various related methods of theft. You are just a lazy thief...
edit on 1-12-2012 by hawkiye because: (no reason given)
Shared ownership helps diversify rather than concentrate wealth – which is what we desperately need to do to revitalise our economy. It roots the value it generates in communities, keeping assets and resources from being transferred from local communities and low-wage employees to multinational corporations and their owners.
Whether today's global overcapacity is seen as cause or effect of the economic crisis, one thing is certain: it isn't easy to make a profit in a world awash with overproduction. Capitalism is born in conditions of scarcity and is unable to function outside of them. So it seems logical that the crisis creates a tendency to restore these conditions artificially. But how does this affect the chances of the global economy to find a way out of its present predicament?
Originally posted by hayek11
reply to post by ANOK
We're being prevented from seeing eye to eye because we define capitalism differently. I define capitalism as free markets because that's one sense of the term. Apparently you leftists use the far less charitable definition of capitalism as some mean old rich guy telling you what to do all day at work. The leftist definition of capitalism as controlling the means of production and exploiting labor to use those means to bring value misses a broad swath of real live (as opposed to socialist fantasy) economic activity. I know a guy who owns a small shop in a town I used to live in. His shop is successful and has a lot of customers who love his business because it brings hard to acquire objects to a rural town. He is virtually always tending shop and I've only known him to have one employee— an old classmate of mine in college who was happy to gain experience and income in the expertise of the shop and shop owner.